precast design

precast design

hafiz
Contributor Contributor
2,062 Views
17 Replies
Message 1 of 18

precast design

hafiz
Contributor
Contributor

good day eveyone.

 

I would like to ask one question, 

 

1) can RSAP 2015 or 2016 design rc element as precast instead of cast in situ? if can, how? 

 

thanks in advance.

Accepted solutions (1)
2,063 Views
17 Replies
Replies (17)
Message 2 of 18

Jummybear
Collaborator
Collaborator
As I know then it cant. Precast usually means of usage prestressed concrete and trusses in it. Robot cant deal with it.
0 Likes
Message 3 of 18

hafiz
Contributor
Contributor

Hi Jummybear,

 

is it availabale in Autodesk advance concrete?

 

I need to make a comparison with Tekla structure. I don't have enough experience with robot and zero knowledge with tekla. Any advice for the comparison?

 

Thanks in advance.

0 Likes
Message 4 of 18

Jummybear
Collaborator
Collaborator
What do you mean by design elements? You compare different things. Robot is used for calculations, whereas Autodesk advance concrete and Tekla are mostly for modelling/drawing software, they do not perform any strength calculations.
0 Likes
Message 5 of 18

hafiz
Contributor
Contributor

what I mean is can ROBOT design RC element such as beam, column or slab as pre-cast instead of cast in-situ. 

 

I run through ROBOT and found on code parameter for rc beam, there is a tick box for precast selection. 

 

you can see in the attached picture. these code parameter also same for column design.

 

But, when I try to calculate some continous beam, the rebar still act as a continous beam instead of precast beam.

 

The only difference is in precast mode, there is extra rebar for lifting.

 

Anyone can help?

 

Capture.JPG

0 Likes
Message 6 of 18

Artur.Kosakowski
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

What reinforcement distribution you get and what would you like to have instead?



Artur Kosakowski
0 Likes
Message 7 of 18

saclovitzky
Collaborator
Collaborator

I do not see a difference between designing, ie, a precast rc beam  and in-situ rc beam. The only difference I know is that, precast is done in an assembly line while in-situ is on-site but the principles in designing them are pretty the same. That's why I'm really interested if ever I tick "precast" in the dialog box, what is the difference will it make in the design process?

0 Likes
Message 8 of 18

Artur.Kosakowski
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

The design includes the situation when a beam is lifted (supports at the hooks positions and self-weight as acting load). 

 

If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.



Artur Kosakowski
Message 9 of 18

saclovitzky
Collaborator
Collaborator

Does it suggest the location of the lifter in the rc beam?Also, does it suggest location of the "lifter/hook" in slabs and rc walls as well?

0 Likes
Message 10 of 18

Artur.Kosakowski
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

No, it doesn't. 

 

If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.



Artur Kosakowski
0 Likes
Message 11 of 18

saclovitzky
Collaborator
Collaborator

"The design includes the situation when a beam is lifted (supports at the hooks positions and self-weight as acting load). "

 

 -So, basically what's exactly the benefit of "ticking" the precast beam. Can you further elaborate the statement above?

0 Likes
Message 12 of 18

Artur.Kosakowski
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

precast beam.PNG

 

If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.



Artur Kosakowski
0 Likes
Message 13 of 18

hafiz
Contributor
Contributor

still not solving my problem..Smiley Sad

0 Likes
Message 14 of 18

Artur.Kosakowski
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

I will try to help you with Robot but I'm not in the position to make comparisons to Tekla if that's your problem Smiley Happy



Artur Kosakowski
0 Likes
Message 15 of 18

hafiz
Contributor
Contributor

it's ok about the tekla.. 

 I've been using robot for 2 years, but I never design or familiar with 'precast' option...

The only diff I see is when I select the precast option, the rebar detail only added the hooked..

Is it that only the diff..??

0 Likes
Message 16 of 18

Artur.Kosakowski
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

As I explained in addition there is a check for the situation where the supports are at locations of hooks and bending is caused by self-weight. In such case you need (e.g. for a simply supported beam) top reinforcement for such created cantilevers at beam's ends. Also provisions for minimal reinforcement bars which are allowed (usually smaller than for standard beams). 

 

If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.



Artur Kosakowski
0 Likes
Message 17 of 18

hafiz
Contributor
Contributor

then how about the ability of robot to design various type of beam besides rectangular beam and T beam as per precast industry demand?

also how about the rc column with corbel?

and lastly the design of hollow core slab?

 

Thanks in advance.

0 Likes
Message 18 of 18

Artur.Kosakowski
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support
Accepted solution

Robot hasn't got a devoted module for precast elements and such elements are not supported. 

 

If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.



Artur Kosakowski
0 Likes