Confusing regarding number of modes and modal mass in Robot

Confusing regarding number of modes and modal mass in Robot

Anonymous
Not applicable
776 Views
4 Replies
Message 1 of 5

Confusing regarding number of modes and modal mass in Robot

Anonymous
Not applicable

Hi,

I am currently testing out robot but have some years of experience with modal analysis in other softwares. I have to issues:

 

1) In my simpel beam model I want to include 10 modes in the results, but I dont know how to tell robot that I want this. It only gives me 1 or up to 4 modes. (maybe due to a too few numbers of nodes?)

 

2) The modal mass is equal to the total mass. This shouldn't be the case. The modal mass is ½ of the total mass for the 1. mode of a simple supported beam and even lower for a clamped-clamped as in my example.

 

I cannot attached the rtd file 

(error: "The attachment's 1beam.rtd content type (application/octet-stream) does not match its file extension and has been removed"

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (1)
777 Views
4 Replies
Replies (4)
Message 2 of 5

Simau
Mentor
Mentor

Hi @Anonymous 

You may tell Robot the number of desired mode here

mode1.jpg

mode2.jpg

If you want to upload your model, zip it before

Attached example file

M. Agayr
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

0 Likes
Message 3 of 5

Anonymous
Not applicable

Hi Simau,

 

Thanks. Im am writing 10, but the it says it can only find 1 (or 4).

 

The model zipped is attached.

 

 

0 Likes
Message 4 of 5

Simau
Mentor
Mentor
Accepted solution

You must create intermedite nodes. The more the number of nodes, the more modes.

Create nodes with: edit>divide then

MODAL1.jpg

M. Agayr
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

0 Likes
Message 5 of 5

Anonymous
Not applicable

That solves both issues - thanks !

0 Likes