I would like to point out that this is not just an international issue. I've never seen this work in the US either, and it remains a limitation on us imposed by Revit.
The point of a revision schedule is to track changes in a set of drawings for both internal and external audiences. Sometimes projects progress in a clear linear fashion and the revisions can be tracked in a linear fashion with perfect alignment between the internal tracking and the external tracking... I haven't been lucky enough to work on such a unicorn in over a decade.
In reality, our documentation is contained in multiple parallel and overlapping drawing sets. Revisions, together with sheets in general, need an system setting for "set of drawings" These can be client vs jurisdiction vs contractor. They may be design vs production. They may be by phase. We need to be able to specify that certain sets of revisions are grouped together and others are grouped together differently according to both the internal tracking and external tracking. For example, in every jurisdiction I have ever worked in, they only want to see permit related revisions, and return the drawings if you show revisions for other audiences. In some cases we have multiple overlapping jurisdiction which each only want to see their own revisions.
In revision schedules, this is vaguely tracked by the text field "issued to" which can contain the information, but can't be used for sorting, filtering, or leveraged for any other aspect of the project views or sheets.
Plug-in and Dynamo provide work arounds for some aspects of this, but at the end of the day there is no work around which doesn't involved Bluebeam or some version of deleting things, un-doing and deleting a different set of clouds for a different audience. We've all created parameters to work around each different aspect of the problem, but none of those can talk to the revision schedule and revision schedules are insulated from our creative work arounds so we're stuck.
Please fix this, it remains an issue.
