Revit MEP Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Revit MEP Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Revit MEP topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

JT Files?

20 REPLIES 20
SOLVED
Reply
Message 1 of 21
ben
Collaborator
2801 Views, 20 Replies

JT Files?

ben
Collaborator
Collaborator

We have a cooling tower that were hooking up to. I went to the manufacturer's website & downloaded the Revit family for the make & model of the cooling tower that is being supplied. (Side note: We're not supplying or setting the cooling tower, just hooking up piping to it, so don't ask me why I'm going through all of the work of trying to find the correct one, I guess it's because were prefabbing all of our piping and I want to make sure it's all correct so were not chopping out pipe apart on site to make it fit). Unfortunately, the Revit model I got from their website, none of the configurations from the dropdown list in the Type Selector, fit the connection size and dimensions that are shown in their shop drawings. I asked the manufacturer for a Revit model of the configuration they spec'd and they said their Revit models are just generic...yippee.

 

He sent me back a 2D CAD drawing, which does me no good, and a 3D JT file. I'd never heard of a JT file before, so I Googled it. I figured out that I can import it into CAD as 3D, but it doesn't have any connectors or anything; it just looks like a nice pretty 3D concept drawing and nothing more.

 

Has anyone ever had to use a JT file in Revit? Is it even possible? Any suggestions?



Revit lives in the land of perfect and doesn't understand what construction is.

0 Likes

JT Files?

We have a cooling tower that were hooking up to. I went to the manufacturer's website & downloaded the Revit family for the make & model of the cooling tower that is being supplied. (Side note: We're not supplying or setting the cooling tower, just hooking up piping to it, so don't ask me why I'm going through all of the work of trying to find the correct one, I guess it's because were prefabbing all of our piping and I want to make sure it's all correct so were not chopping out pipe apart on site to make it fit). Unfortunately, the Revit model I got from their website, none of the configurations from the dropdown list in the Type Selector, fit the connection size and dimensions that are shown in their shop drawings. I asked the manufacturer for a Revit model of the configuration they spec'd and they said their Revit models are just generic...yippee.

 

He sent me back a 2D CAD drawing, which does me no good, and a 3D JT file. I'd never heard of a JT file before, so I Googled it. I figured out that I can import it into CAD as 3D, but it doesn't have any connectors or anything; it just looks like a nice pretty 3D concept drawing and nothing more.

 

Has anyone ever had to use a JT file in Revit? Is it even possible? Any suggestions?



Revit lives in the land of perfect and doesn't understand what construction is.

20 REPLIES 20
Message 2 of 21
RobDraw
in reply to: ben

RobDraw
Mentor
Mentor
Accepted solution

Use the correct information provided to adjust their generic family so that the connectors are in the proper location or make your own simplified version of the tower.


Rob

Drafting is a breeze and Revit doesn't always work the way you think it should.

Use the correct information provided to adjust their generic family so that the connectors are in the proper location or make your own simplified version of the tower.


Rob

Drafting is a breeze and Revit doesn't always work the way you think it should.
Message 3 of 21
ben
Collaborator
in reply to: RobDraw

ben
Collaborator
Collaborator

@RobDraw wrote:

Use the correct information provided to adjust their generic family so that the connectors are in the proper location or make your own simplified version of the tower.


That's kinda what I figured, and what I was just starting to do. I took the one tower that had the correct outside size (HxWxD), went into the family editor, deleting connectors that wont be used and adjusting them to the correct size and location. Unfortunately, the shop drawings they provided are s*** and don't have much for dimensions on them either. Lot of emailing back & forth trying to fact-find the correct information. They seem to put a lot of work into a generic model; as much as they put into it you'd think they'd make a catalog for the all the ones of different specs.



Revit lives in the land of perfect and doesn't understand what construction is.

0 Likes


@RobDraw wrote:

Use the correct information provided to adjust their generic family so that the connectors are in the proper location or make your own simplified version of the tower.


That's kinda what I figured, and what I was just starting to do. I took the one tower that had the correct outside size (HxWxD), went into the family editor, deleting connectors that wont be used and adjusting them to the correct size and location. Unfortunately, the shop drawings they provided are s*** and don't have much for dimensions on them either. Lot of emailing back & forth trying to fact-find the correct information. They seem to put a lot of work into a generic model; as much as they put into it you'd think they'd make a catalog for the all the ones of different specs.



Revit lives in the land of perfect and doesn't understand what construction is.

Message 4 of 21
ben
Collaborator
in reply to: RobDraw

ben
Collaborator
Collaborator

Ok @RobDraw, I have a bit of a head scratcher for ya. I went through and modified the cooling tower family to make it fit the info they gave me in a pdf (connection sizes, locations, etc). I loaded it into the project and overwrite the parameters, and the connectors are showing up on both of them, but the extrusions are only showing up on one of them. Any ideas?

 

SPX.png

 

SPX2.png

 

SPX3.png



Revit lives in the land of perfect and doesn't understand what construction is.

0 Likes

Ok @RobDraw, I have a bit of a head scratcher for ya. I went through and modified the cooling tower family to make it fit the info they gave me in a pdf (connection sizes, locations, etc). I loaded it into the project and overwrite the parameters, and the connectors are showing up on both of them, but the extrusions are only showing up on one of them. Any ideas?

 

SPX.png

 

SPX2.png

 

SPX3.png



Revit lives in the land of perfect and doesn't understand what construction is.

Message 5 of 21
RobDraw
in reply to: ben

RobDraw
Mentor
Mentor

Yeah, share the family and I can look at it over the weekend.


Rob

Drafting is a breeze and Revit doesn't always work the way you think it should.
0 Likes

Yeah, share the family and I can look at it over the weekend.


Rob

Drafting is a breeze and Revit doesn't always work the way you think it should.
Message 6 of 21
ben
Collaborator
in reply to: RobDraw

ben
Collaborator
Collaborator

Thanks @RobDraw

 

The one I tried modifying was the MD5016_D_SingleCell (seen in the Type Selector)



Revit lives in the land of perfect and doesn't understand what construction is.

0 Likes

Thanks @RobDraw

 

The one I tried modifying was the MD5016_D_SingleCell (seen in the Type Selector)



Revit lives in the land of perfect and doesn't understand what construction is.

Message 7 of 21
ben
Collaborator
in reply to: RobDraw

ben
Collaborator
Collaborator

@RobDraw Here's my chicken scratch, if it helps

 

IMG_3042.jpg



Revit lives in the land of perfect and doesn't understand what construction is.

0 Likes

@RobDraw Here's my chicken scratch, if it helps

 

IMG_3042.jpg



Revit lives in the land of perfect and doesn't understand what construction is.

Message 8 of 21
ben
Collaborator
in reply to: RobDraw

ben
Collaborator
Collaborator

@RobDraw all the manufacturer keeps sending me are dwg import symbols



Revit lives in the land of perfect and doesn't understand what construction is.

0 Likes

@RobDraw all the manufacturer keeps sending me are dwg import symbols



Revit lives in the land of perfect and doesn't understand what construction is.

Message 9 of 21
RobDraw
in reply to: ben

RobDraw
Mentor
Mentor

Sorry to hear that. Also sorry I left you hanging. I forgot that I didn't have a computer set up at home.

 

Do you still need help with the visibility issue?


Rob

Drafting is a breeze and Revit doesn't always work the way you think it should.
0 Likes

Sorry to hear that. Also sorry I left you hanging. I forgot that I didn't have a computer set up at home.

 

Do you still need help with the visibility issue?


Rob

Drafting is a breeze and Revit doesn't always work the way you think it should.
Message 10 of 21
ben
Collaborator
in reply to: RobDraw

ben
Collaborator
Collaborator

@RobDraw wrote:

Sorry to hear that. Also sorry I left you hanging. I forgot that I didn't have a computer set up at home.

 

Do you still need help with the visibility issue?


No worries. Attached is the latest one they sent me. Even though it's just a dwg import symbol I tried adding connectors, but that doesn't seem to work all that great. I try adding a connector on a connection up high, and it puts it either near a connection towards the bottom or in the bottom corner. Now I'm trying to add reference plains in hopes I can snap connectors on the intersection.



Revit lives in the land of perfect and doesn't understand what construction is.

0 Likes


@RobDraw wrote:

Sorry to hear that. Also sorry I left you hanging. I forgot that I didn't have a computer set up at home.

 

Do you still need help with the visibility issue?


No worries. Attached is the latest one they sent me. Even though it's just a dwg import symbol I tried adding connectors, but that doesn't seem to work all that great. I try adding a connector on a connection up high, and it puts it either near a connection towards the bottom or in the bottom corner. Now I'm trying to add reference plains in hopes I can snap connectors on the intersection.



Revit lives in the land of perfect and doesn't understand what construction is.

Message 11 of 21
RobDraw
in reply to: ben

RobDraw
Mentor
Mentor

I'm not going to be much help with working with imported objects beyond suggesting doing whatever is required for changing them to native Revit objects before trying to work with them.


Rob

Drafting is a breeze and Revit doesn't always work the way you think it should.
0 Likes

I'm not going to be much help with working with imported objects beyond suggesting doing whatever is required for changing them to native Revit objects before trying to work with them.


Rob

Drafting is a breeze and Revit doesn't always work the way you think it should.
Message 12 of 21
ben
Collaborator
in reply to: RobDraw

ben
Collaborator
Collaborator

@RobDraw so keep bugging the manufacturer for a native Revit family/object, and not just dwg imports?



Revit lives in the land of perfect and doesn't understand what construction is.

0 Likes

@RobDraw so keep bugging the manufacturer for a native Revit family/object, and not just dwg imports?



Revit lives in the land of perfect and doesn't understand what construction is.

Message 13 of 21
RobDraw
in reply to: ben

RobDraw
Mentor
Mentor
Accepted solution

They have no obligation to provide that. Some will but I wouldn't bug them about it. I would try a quick fix and see if exploding the imports is successful in converting at least what you need. If exploding throws errors, I would make my own family to the manufacturer's specs.


Rob

Drafting is a breeze and Revit doesn't always work the way you think it should.

They have no obligation to provide that. Some will but I wouldn't bug them about it. I would try a quick fix and see if exploding the imports is successful in converting at least what you need. If exploding throws errors, I would make my own family to the manufacturer's specs.


Rob

Drafting is a breeze and Revit doesn't always work the way you think it should.
Message 14 of 21
ben
Collaborator
in reply to: RobDraw

ben
Collaborator
Collaborator

@RobDraw ok, I did the full explode and was able to put my connectors on the Generic Model parts. Now that it should be functional, is there a was to "unexploded" it so it all goes back together? Do I just create a group? Is it even a necessary step? 



Revit lives in the land of perfect and doesn't understand what construction is.

0 Likes

@RobDraw ok, I did the full explode and was able to put my connectors on the Generic Model parts. Now that it should be functional, is there a was to "unexploded" it so it all goes back together? Do I just create a group? Is it even a necessary step? 



Revit lives in the land of perfect and doesn't understand what construction is.

Message 15 of 21
RobDraw
in reply to: ben

RobDraw
Mentor
Mentor

The family is the grouping mechanism. Save as a new family and test it in a project. 


Rob

Drafting is a breeze and Revit doesn't always work the way you think it should.

The family is the grouping mechanism. Save as a new family and test it in a project. 


Rob

Drafting is a breeze and Revit doesn't always work the way you think it should.
Message 16 of 21
ben
Collaborator
in reply to: RobDraw

ben
Collaborator
Collaborator

@RobDraw It seems like it works. How's it look to you?

 

The one that's clicked on is the old one that's an actual Revit family, but generic with wrong connectors in wrong locations

 

Old.png

 

The one that's clicked on in this picture is the new one that's a dwg import, but with connection ports shown in the correct location, I added the connectors

 

New.png

 

How does it look to you?



Revit lives in the land of perfect and doesn't understand what construction is.

0 Likes

@RobDraw It seems like it works. How's it look to you?

 

The one that's clicked on is the old one that's an actual Revit family, but generic with wrong connectors in wrong locations

 

Old.png

 

The one that's clicked on in this picture is the new one that's a dwg import, but with connection ports shown in the correct location, I added the connectors

 

New.png

 

How does it look to you?



Revit lives in the land of perfect and doesn't understand what construction is.

Message 17 of 21
RobDraw
in reply to: ben

RobDraw
Mentor
Mentor

I thought you exploded the import objects to Revit objects but aside from that, it looks great. 


Rob

Drafting is a breeze and Revit doesn't always work the way you think it should.
0 Likes

I thought you exploded the import objects to Revit objects but aside from that, it looks great. 


Rob

Drafting is a breeze and Revit doesn't always work the way you think it should.
Message 18 of 21
ben
Collaborator
in reply to: RobDraw

ben
Collaborator
Collaborator

@RobDraw I guess I'm not sure how to explode import objects into Revit objects.

 

I just did this

 

Explode.png

 

 

And this is what it looked like after I exploded it, when I click on the different objects/generic models

 

Generic.png



Revit lives in the land of perfect and doesn't understand what construction is.

0 Likes

@RobDraw I guess I'm not sure how to explode import objects into Revit objects.

 

I just did this

 

Explode.png

 

 

And this is what it looked like after I exploded it, when I click on the different objects/generic models

 

Generic.png



Revit lives in the land of perfect and doesn't understand what construction is.

Message 19 of 21
RobDraw
in reply to: ben

RobDraw
Mentor
Mentor

Generic models are native Revit objects. You're good to go in my book!


Rob

Drafting is a breeze and Revit doesn't always work the way you think it should.

Generic models are native Revit objects. You're good to go in my book!


Rob

Drafting is a breeze and Revit doesn't always work the way you think it should.
Message 20 of 21
ben
Collaborator
in reply to: RobDraw

ben
Collaborator
Collaborator

@RobDraw Thanks for your help!



Revit lives in the land of perfect and doesn't understand what construction is.

0 Likes

@RobDraw Thanks for your help!



Revit lives in the land of perfect and doesn't understand what construction is.

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report