Yep, hence why I opted to just share AU presentations. You can very clearly see based on sorting by year when the term became marketable.
I would like to think that the perception is trending towards data-rich, but ultimately to use a digital twin you have to have personnel and equipment able to open and manipulate 3D modelling software... meanwhile we're still trying to get contractors to train owners on how to use their thermostats.
I do think the idea is nice, and ultimately should be folded into BMS applications in some way that meets their constant need for custom GUIs. I still struggle to see why an owner would want the expenditure (especially if they already have a service contract with a BMS company that can provide similar levels of data visibility).