Announcements

The Autodesk Community Forums has a new look. Read more about what's changed on the Community Announcements board.

3D Plumbing Revit Model to 2D Elevation Riser Diagram

peter_markarian
Explorer

3D Plumbing Revit Model to 2D Elevation Riser Diagram

peter_markarian
Explorer
Explorer

We have a very intricate model that shows the CW, HW, HWR piping and fixtures. It's already "smart" modeled in Revit. All the required users are assigned. My question is: can I use this model from Revit to develop quickly a 2D flow diagram (like an electrical one-line diagram)?

0 Likes
Reply
410 Views
4 Replies
Replies (4)

curtisridenour
Collaborator
Collaborator
i would suggest doing something like this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXLkABdqkrQ
0 Likes

peter_markarian
Explorer
Explorer

Thanks for the suggestion, but I need to create a 2D "flow diagram" (like in the image attached), not an isometric.

0 Likes

Washingtonn
Collaborator
Collaborator

"Quickly" will depend on the original Revit configuration and the complexity of the system(s).  IMHO, you would probably be spending more time copying and manipulating the 3D layout to look like a 2D diagram as you would just drawing the diagram in 2D  while referencing the Revit 3D.

0 Likes

robert2JCCH
Collaborator
Collaborator

https://www.autodesk.com/autodesk-university/class/Creating-Automated-Documentation-Dynamo-2018

 

This is worth a watch for how the presenter automates Fire Alarm Schematics, since the core concepts are there:

  • Identifying elements of interest from the model (Plumbing Fixtures)
  • Converting XYZ coordinates to a 2D XY system
  • Plugging in 2D symbols into a Drafting View based on the XY system, and having each symbol be based on the associated fixture type.
  • Pushing parameter data from the 3D modelled fixture to the 2D symbolic fixture for annotating.

 

Where is stops being 'quick' is going to be the actual connected plumbing lines - you'd have to custom create the dynamo code component that would attempt to draft the mains/stacks. That can get very complex very quickly, so you may just want to stop short of this step and be satisfied with automatic symbols onto a drafting view that come with additional annotative information (fixture units, flow rates).

 

The complexity of the piping step is also why many firms will opt to just use isometrics for the purpose of a flow diagram - it's all modelled stuff, it's all correct, it's all already there. You just need to be willing to engage more paperspace to the task.