Revit Architecture Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Revit Architecture Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Revit Architecture topics.
abbrechen
Suchergebnisse werden angezeigt für 
Anzeigen  nur  | Stattdessen suchen nach 
Meintest du: 

traditional plan...

12 ANTWORTEN 12
GELÖST
Antworten
Nachricht 1 von 13
Yien_Chao
754 Aufrufe, 12 Antworten

traditional plan...

 

In many architectural offices in Quebec, Canada (I did not compare with elsewhere in the world) the choice of hatching is only sparingly and to get a better reading of the plan. I will not discuss standards here, but only a fairly simple wish: To be able to display partition walls with only 2 lines and when there are supports such as concrete or concrete block, to display separate hatches and lines.

An example here, but I had to model 2 separate walls. One for the support (concrete block) and the other for all the rest of the finish.
Is it possible to achieve this with just one element while staying at a low level of detail?

 

2021-09-07_21-57-37.jpg

Beschriftungen (2)
12 ANTWORTEN 12
Nachricht 2 von 13
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: Yien_Chao

What about Parts and then merge Layers together (after making them the same Material of course)?  

 

 

 

 

Part97-1.pngPart97-2.pngPart97-3.png

 

 

Nachricht 3 von 13
syman2000
als Antwort auf: Yien_Chao

Part would probably the approach. However if you don't want to merge multiple layers, other method you can use it add profile to the wall.

 

First add no hatch material to the course

 

wall.png

 

Define the thickness of the CMU wall. Add your sweep profile. There add material to your sweep. Once you achieve this, you should be able to see your profile overlapping with your wall.

 

profile.png

 

In the profile family, this is where you adjust the height and thickness.

profile 2.png

Check out my Revit youtube channel - https://www.youtube.com/user/scourdx
Nachricht 4 von 13
RDAOU
als Antwort auf: Yien_Chao

@Yien_Chao 

 

What you have done (2x wall Types joined) is the right and quickest to do it...any other way would be unnecessary tediousness. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOUTUBE | BIM | COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN | PARAMETRIC DESIGN | GENERATIVE DESIGN | VISUAL PROGRAMMING
If you find this reply helpful kindly hit the LIKE BUTTON and if applicable please ACCEPT AS SOLUTION


Nachricht 5 von 13
XXalessio.amodioXX
als Antwort auf: Yien_Chao

Usually I model separetely Structural/Architectural and Finish walls. I think is the best practice

Nachricht 6 von 13
Yien_Chao
als Antwort auf: barthbradley

That would work only if you dont have too many walls and the design is fixed.

Nachricht 7 von 13
Yien_Chao
als Antwort auf: syman2000

Will test this one

Nachricht 8 von 13
Yien_Chao
als Antwort auf: RDAOU

Yes indeed. But both are supposed to be one component. Easier for tagging and quantity check.

Nachricht 9 von 13
RDAOU
als Antwort auf: Yien_Chao

@Yien_Chao 

 

Not necessarily...technically speaking they can be 2 components.You can join geometry and/or you can assemble them together (Select both and create assembly). 

 

  • In terms of quantities and take offs, it is the same...both fall under the category walls.
  • In terms of tagging, it is even more convenient because you would be able to tag a whole lot more than material
  • In terms of practicality ... you would be able to issue framing layouts without any extra hassle 

The only extra effort which you might need to put is in the Inserts families...door frame would require a slight adjustment to neck both walls

 

 

 

YOUTUBE | BIM | COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN | PARAMETRIC DESIGN | GENERATIVE DESIGN | VISUAL PROGRAMMING
If you find this reply helpful kindly hit the LIKE BUTTON and if applicable please ACCEPT AS SOLUTION


Nachricht 10 von 13
Yien_Chao
als Antwort auf: RDAOU

will check this one too.
Nachricht 11 von 13
Yien_Chao
als Antwort auf: RDAOU


@RDAOU wrote:

The only extra effort which you might need to put is in the Inserts families...door frame would require a slight adjustment to neck both walls

 

i think if you attach both, openings and doors will follow as one.

 


 

Nachricht 12 von 13
RDAOU
als Antwort auf: Yien_Chao


@Yien_Chao wrote:

@RDAOU wrote:

The only extra effort which you might need to put is in the Inserts families...door frame would require a slight adjustment to neck both walls

 

i think if you attach both, openings and doors will follow as one.

 


 


The opening yes, it will cut both joined walls but the geometry will not behave that way...ie: the depth of the sweep/extrusion of a door Frame will not increase to neck/flush both walls (it will stick to its primary host)...but with a little tweak that can be modified to make it work

 

 

YOUTUBE | BIM | COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN | PARAMETRIC DESIGN | GENERATIVE DESIGN | VISUAL PROGRAMMING
If you find this reply helpful kindly hit the LIKE BUTTON and if applicable please ACCEPT AS SOLUTION


Nachricht 13 von 13
Yien_Chao
als Antwort auf: RDAOU

think i will stick with the first idea : model 2 elements, joined them. less workaround.

Thank all

Sie finden nicht, was Sie suchen? Fragen Sie die Community oder teilen Sie Ihr Wissen mit anderen.

In Foren veröffentlichen  

Autodesk Design & Make Report