Revit Architecture Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Revit Architecture Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Revit Architecture topics.
abbrechen
Suchergebnisse werden angezeigt für 
Anzeigen  nur  | Stattdessen suchen nach 
Meintest du: 

Toposolid makes Revit useless

5 ANTWORTEN 5
Antworten
Nachricht 1 von 6
simon_kveen
172 Aufrufe, 5 Antworten

Toposolid makes Revit useless

Going from toposurface to toposolid have completely ruined Revit. 

The workflow is incredibly slow when working with toposolid. I mean really, reeeally slow. 

 

Bring back toposurface and get rid of toposolid - we don't need it.

Beschriftungen (2)
5 ANTWORTEN 5
Nachricht 2 von 6
RDAOU
als Antwort auf: simon_kveen

@simon_kveen 

 

It is impossible to please everyone but I am not so sure it is THAT bad. If one is used to the workflow of modeling site in a separate model (which many users could not understand and used to complain about), one can still use toposurface in a previous version and do all the cuts and fill there. Moreover, 

  • one can also link it to the models in 2025 version and keep it as a surface 
  • and/or bind it and just keep it as a surface
  • create a new solidtopo out of it
  • Either way, the cut and fill carries over

 

YOUTUBE | BIM | COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN | PARAMETRIC DESIGN | GENERATIVE DESIGN | VISUAL PROGRAMMING
If you find this reply helpful kindly hit the LIKE BUTTON and if applicable please ACCEPT AS SOLUTION


Nachricht 3 von 6
simon_kveen
als Antwort auf: simon_kveen

Everything worked fine with toposurface. No need to change anything. 

Working with two different versions of Revit is not a solution.

 

  • You can not link your building model that you made with Revit 2025 into your site model from 2023. That is not possible. 
  • Yes, you can create a new toposolid of the toposurface, but have you ever tried editing that toposolid? It takes a whole year just to change the value of a single sub-point. 
Nachricht 4 von 6
RDAOU
als Antwort auf: simon_kveen


@simon_kveen wrote:

Everything worked fine with toposurface. No need to change anything. 

Working with two different versions of Revit is not a solution.

  • You can not link your building model that you made with Revit 2025 into your site model from 2023. That is not possible. 
  • Yes, you can create a new toposolid of the toposurface, but have you ever tried editing that toposolid? It takes a whole year just to change the value of a single sub-point. 

@simon_kveen 

 

Whether it was in the past version or new version, the the proper workflow for topo7site was and is still to model in a separate model. if that separate model is 2023 or 2025 what is the difference?!

 

  • Yes you can...read again the previous reply, you have linked the 2023 into a 2025 blank site. from this point on you would link the 2025 site into your building model since that would be the main model and not vise versa. But if you are that pickiny, the 2023 is linked into a 2025 so what prevents you from linking the building into that?!
  • Yes I have and with all due respect you are literally exagurating. A Year? Seriously?

 

When it used to be only toposurface, some used dynamo to transform that into solids/masses/floors while many complained why this option is limited to the few who know how to use dynamo. It was such a fuss that the topic went into seminars, AU Classes, Youtube and all over where Revit was a topic. Instead of having access to both worlds by learning a little bit of dynmo, users kept demanding to have the solid version. Now that Autodesk have decided to give the people what they want, I read negative comments, critcizm and complaints because the Toposurface was so much better. :grinsendes_Gesicht_mit_lächelnden_Augen: and I bet many of those complaining now are some of those who complained in the past. I am not saying you are one of those but just saying thats how it seems things are

 

 

YOUTUBE | BIM | COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN | PARAMETRIC DESIGN | GENERATIVE DESIGN | VISUAL PROGRAMMING
If you find this reply helpful kindly hit the LIKE BUTTON and if applicable please ACCEPT AS SOLUTION


Nachricht 5 von 6
simon_kveen
als Antwort auf: simon_kveen

Wow, ok.... You mean this is a good solution? Should I hit the accept solution button?

Autodesk offers a 30 days free trial for Revit you know. You should try it sometime. Let me know how it goes. 

Nachricht 6 von 6
RDAOU
als Antwort auf: simon_kveen

@simon_kveen 

 

No you don’t because there is no problem to solve the first place. The suggested workflow was not specifically suggested for you to use but shared for those who come across this post to consider.

 

The topography worked fine in the past even when some were unable to live with it and it works fine today even when you are unable to coop with it and as mention before most of those who complained in the past are the same who complain today.



YOUTUBE | BIM | COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN | PARAMETRIC DESIGN | GENERATIVE DESIGN | VISUAL PROGRAMMING
If you find this reply helpful kindly hit the LIKE BUTTON and if applicable please ACCEPT AS SOLUTION


Sie finden nicht, was Sie suchen? Fragen Sie die Community oder teilen Sie Ihr Wissen mit anderen.

In Foren veröffentlichen  

Autodesk Design & Make Report