Although, I would have to agree that "In Place Editing" of loaded family
components would be very nice! Double-click on a loaded family, and enter
"family edit mode." Make the changes needed, then hit a special 'save
changes to family' button, and the external family file would be sved and
reloaded into your project.
AutoCAD 2005 has in place editing, and I have to say, it's a major
timesaver.
"JTB" wrote in message news:416008ed_3@newsprd01...
> Software development is not a racing. I tried to learn ADT after 15 years
of
> AutoCAD and I thought from the beginning that it was a completely
different
> program... I think Revit is much easier and faster. Of course Revit needs
> many improvements but I think that opening a second file to edit the
profile
> is not something new for AutoCAD users. For example if you use a block
from
> a file (not Xref) you have to open the file, change what you want and then
> re-load it into the main dwg file. I am sure that you will love how revit
> produces everything so fast, also read a little about design options to
see
> how you can keep every idea you have into the same file. I can understand
> that the absence of layers seems a little strange at the beginning you
will
> get used to in a short time.
>
> I think that if the guys in Revit's development team read AUGI's Revit
> wishlist forum then Revit 7 will be great!
>
> > I have to say that is a very very disapointing answer. I am an expert
> with ADT but after using revit I actually perfer > Revit. But in adt all
> the objects are 100% parametric and editable in place. If I was doing
this
> in ADT I could >select the sweep itself and change the profile in any
way
> I wish. I can change it's size or add and remove >Geometry. Revit will
> need to have this type of ability if it is to compete and finally overtake
> ADT.
>
>