Revit Architecture Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Revit Architecture Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Revit Architecture topics.
abbrechen
Suchergebnisse werden angezeigt für 
Anzeigen  nur  | Stattdessen suchen nach 
Meintest du: 

architectural column placement

12 ANTWORTEN 12
GELÖST
Antworten
Nachricht 1 von 13
sakar_deepak
2393 Aufrufe, 12 Antworten

architectural column placement

Hi Dear friends

 

Is it possible to place multiple architectural columns at the intersection of grid lines just like structural columns ? If not, what is the way around ? 

 

Regards

Regards

Deepak Gupta
Architect

(...... those, who are answering the problems in community forum here, are great people .....)
12 ANTWORTEN 12
Nachricht 2 von 13
pendean
als Antwort auf: sakar_deepak
Nachricht 3 von 13
sakar_deepak
als Antwort auf: pendean

Sir,

Thank you for the reply. But my question is different. 

 

I know how to place multiple structural column on a grid.

I want to know how to place the architectural/ decorative columns ? 

Regards

Deepak Gupta
Architect

(...... those, who are answering the problems in community forum here, are great people .....)
Nachricht 4 von 13
RDAOU
als Antwort auf: sakar_deepak

@sakar_deepak

 

Using a one click tool like the structural columns, no you can't .... The option to attach architectural columns to structural grids is not available (at least not in 2016)... But u can resort to other means in order to do something similar 

 

example: one example is use arrays ... Another example is to use Dynamo which can carry out the same operation for architectural columns and place them at a set of coordinates or at grid intersections.

YOUTUBE | BIM | COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN | PARAMETRIC DESIGN | GENERATIVE DESIGN | VISUAL PROGRAMMING
If you find this reply helpful kindly hit the LIKE BUTTON and if applicable please ACCEPT AS SOLUTION


Nachricht 5 von 13
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: sakar_deepak

Why not just change the category of your architectural column family to that of structural column? Wouldn't that work? 

Nachricht 6 von 13
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: barthbradley

...just tested and seems to work fine; albeit with some warnings that, right off the bat, don’t appear insurmountable to correct.

 

Basically, open architectural “Column” family and change its category - under “Category and Parameters” - to “Structural Column”. Reload and test.  If you get same results as I did, you should now be able to place multiples of it at grid intersections simultaneously.  

 

Is this not the solution you were looking for?

Nachricht 7 von 13
sakar_deepak
als Antwort auf: barthbradley

Yes, this the kind of solution I am looking for. This is wonderful if it works. 

Let me check it then i intimate you. 

Regards

Deepak Gupta
Architect

(...... those, who are answering the problems in community forum here, are great people .....)
Nachricht 8 von 13
Alfredo_Medina
als Antwort auf: sakar_deepak

@sakar_deepak

 

Just remember to change the category back to the original. :leicht_lächelndes_Gesicht:


Alfredo Medina _________________________________________________________________ ______
Licensed Architect (Florida) | Freelance Instructor | Profile on Linkedin
Nachricht 9 von 13
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: Alfredo_Medina

Once you’ve loaded it in the project as a Structural Column, you won’t be able to re-categorize it. If you need to use it as an Architectural Column, my solution won’t work for you.

Nachricht 10 von 13
sakar_deepak
als Antwort auf: barthbradley

@barthbradley  what kind of problems will it pose if architectural column is used as an structural column as per your solution ? 

Regards

Deepak Gupta
Architect

(...... those, who are answering the problems in community forum here, are great people .....)
Nachricht 11 von 13
RDAOU
als Antwort auf: sakar_deepak

@sakar_deepak

 

they r two types of columns...architectural are decorative non-load bearing elements while structural are ...well... load bearing with structural &analytical properties.. Apart from the fact that the latter behave differently and are basically a different discipline; if you are treating REVIT as a drafting tool then there is no difference u can just use structural columns the first place. BUT IF u are working BIM then your model and its elements should reflect the right information as it ought to be...

 

talk to your structural engineer and exchange information that's the right way to go...then use structural columns where needed and architectural columns where there is no need for structural columns 

YOUTUBE | BIM | COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN | PARAMETRIC DESIGN | GENERATIVE DESIGN | VISUAL PROGRAMMING
If you find this reply helpful kindly hit the LIKE BUTTON and if applicable please ACCEPT AS SOLUTION


Nachricht 12 von 13
barthbradley
als Antwort auf: sakar_deepak

none.

Nachricht 13 von 13
RDAOU
als Antwort auf: barthbradley


@Anonymous wrote:

none.


That is one good thing about REVIT and BIM it puts the credibility of the engineer and/or architect at stake :leicht_lächelndes_Gesicht: but again where's the problem in that? Right?

YOUTUBE | BIM | COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN | PARAMETRIC DESIGN | GENERATIVE DESIGN | VISUAL PROGRAMMING
If you find this reply helpful kindly hit the LIKE BUTTON and if applicable please ACCEPT AS SOLUTION


Sie finden nicht, was Sie suchen? Fragen Sie die Community oder teilen Sie Ihr Wissen mit anderen.

In Foren veröffentlichen  

Autodesk Design & Make Report