Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Show only
|
Search instead for
Did you mean:
This page has been translated for your convenience with an automatic translation service. This is not an official translation and may contain errors and inaccurate translations. Autodesk does not warrant, either expressly or implied, the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information translated by the machine translation service and will not be liable for damages or losses caused by the trust placed in the translation service.Translate
I hope that is not the vibe with Mudbox at Autodesk. It will be sooner then later we will find out the direction Mudbox is going, I really do hope they surprise us.
I hope that is not the vibe with Mudbox at Autodesk. It will be sooner then later we will find out the direction Mudbox is going, I really do hope they surprise us.
Painting could use some minor improvements, overall painting in Mud is as you say, good 🙂
There are a few things in Mudbox sculpting that needs improvement, that I hope come in 2016. If they were to add those improvements, Mudbox would be superior.
Painting could use some minor improvements, overall painting in Mud is as you say, good 🙂
There are a few things in Mudbox sculpting that needs improvement, that I hope come in 2016. If they were to add those improvements, Mudbox would be superior.
You found my mesh mixer tutorial ? 🙂 Thanks 🙂 Yes this and Python scripting, there is one more thing I'd like to see Mudbox have, I can't remember. Autodesk needs to bring me on their Mudbox team, talk with developers, then push Mudbox to the next level, and that level is not far away.
You found my mesh mixer tutorial ? 🙂 Thanks 🙂 Yes this and Python scripting, there is one more thing I'd like to see Mudbox have, I can't remember. Autodesk needs to bring me on their Mudbox team, talk with developers, then push Mudbox to the next level, and that level is not far away.
I heard a rumor saying that mudbox is being integrated into maya 2016. IMO its cool and all, and opens up a lot of possiblilities. But I still would like a standalone version of it.
I heard a rumor saying that mudbox is being integrated into maya 2016. IMO its cool and all, and opens up a lot of possiblilities. But I still would like a standalone version of it.
There are people on subscription with Mudbox, nothing can be said until, hopefully soon an annoucment is made as to the future of Mudbox. Will it continue for one more version, then be integrated into Maya(LT), will it continue for two more versions, before being integrated into Maya(LT) ?
Mudbox is not dead, like Softimage, it may just be integrated into Maya(LT), or maybe what your seeing in MayaLT is a lite version of Mudbox ?
There are people on subscription with Mudbox, nothing can be said until, hopefully soon an annoucment is made as to the future of Mudbox. Will it continue for one more version, then be integrated into Maya(LT), will it continue for two more versions, before being integrated into Maya(LT) ?
Mudbox is not dead, like Softimage, it may just be integrated into Maya(LT), or maybe what your seeing in MayaLT is a lite version of Mudbox ?
In my opinion, and lookig the MAYA LT 2016 announcement, will not be an Mudbox 2016.
Because the new things that all us are awaiting in a possible Mudbox2016, already are in MAX and MAYA.
Autodesk have this own policy: If an software could be good enought,(like happened with Mudbox), or could be a competitor for their products, Autodesk buy it. After that, Autodesk abandon it like is happening with Mudbox 2015.
In my opinion, and lookig the MAYA LT 2016 announcement, will not be an Mudbox 2016.
Because the new things that all us are awaiting in a possible Mudbox2016, already are in MAX and MAYA.
Autodesk have this own policy: If an software could be good enought,(like happened with Mudbox), or could be a competitor for their products, Autodesk buy it. After that, Autodesk abandon it like is happening with Mudbox 2015.
If there isn't a Mudbox 2016 and people have paid for subscription, I assume, rather I hope, Autodesk will give some incentive to transfer your subscription.
We can only wait and see ! I still suspect there will be a Mudbox 2016 at the least, with some info that it will, not be dead as you say, rather integrated into Maya !
If there isn't a Mudbox 2016 and people have paid for subscription, I assume, rather I hope, Autodesk will give some incentive to transfer your subscription.
We can only wait and see ! I still suspect there will be a Mudbox 2016 at the least, with some info that it will, not be dead as you say, rather integrated into Maya !
If they Integrate Mud in Maya, bad news for me.I used 3D Studio since 1998, and Mudbox since 2009. I will not learn Maya only for the reason that Autodesk like that.And people that actually use Mudbox and/or MAX should to pay another license for can use Mudbox,(with new and good add-ons, I hope) within MAYA?.hmmm!...I cannot avoid to think that all is finished with Mud.
If they Integrate Mud in Maya, bad news for me.I used 3D Studio since 1998, and Mudbox since 2009. I will not learn Maya only for the reason that Autodesk like that.And people that actually use Mudbox and/or MAX should to pay another license for can use Mudbox,(with new and good add-ons, I hope) within MAYA?.hmmm!...I cannot avoid to think that all is finished with Mud.
For more information, click this link: Mudbox Certified Hardware) help me out please or i want my money back thank you i hope someone can help me fix this...
For more information, click this link: Mudbox Certified Hardware) help me out please or i want my money back thank you i hope someone can help me fix this...
