There are two possibilities to create a 3d tetra mesh with a 3d runner:
First option:
- Import part and runner as one cad model
- Meshing both as one model with tetras
- After meshing you can define the runner as 3d runner
Disadvantage of this option:
- You have non planar surfaces in the interface between runner and part
- It could happen, that the mesher produced a coarser mesh inside the interface region
Second Option:
- Import part and runner as a separate cad model
- Define the cad runner as 3d runner
- Meshing both as separate model with tetras using the option “Precise match”
- After meshing you have to control, that all nodes in the interface are matching
- If this is ok, you can merge the interface nodes with a global merge with a low distance e.g. 0,001 mm.
Disadvantage of this option:
- You must shut off the option “ Use surface mesh optimization”
- It is a time consuming method
To improve this meshing process I would like to have:
- An option where I can define the interface surface or elements as a “gate surface”
- The 3d mesher should now automatically mesh both, runner and part, in 3d and connect them during the meshing
- The runner and part surface in the interface should be kept as a planar surface