I made the concentric rings using a circle STAMP. To get the center point of the rings I dropped a Pivot somewhere on the surface. Now drawing a stamp and starting to drag near the pivot the stamp's center snaps to the pivot.
Be aware of the SnapDimensions checkbox at the bottom of the tool's flyout. Enabled the possible sizes and rotation angles are restricted to certain increments. The increments' scale is related to the last used snapping settings in Transform (but not equal).
Start stamping the biggest diameter flowed by the 2nd biggest, aso....
To get a rectangular group you might use the square stamp or create a custom stamp in SELECT.
Another possibility is to use PlaneCut (in EDIT or in SELECT/Edit) in CutType = SliceGroups. Note: Doing such a cut on a selection will cause small open boundaries at the border of the selection. You'll need to repair these errors using ANALYSIS/Inspector.
----
I see you separated a ring of triangles. Be aware that if you construct a complex on such an separated part you can't weld the complex to the rest of the mesh AND keeping the complex information further on if the rest of the mesh isn't a complex (you'll loose the Complex flag this way and the interior surface will give a non-manifold issue)...
----
This said:
The Complex tool renders valid group boundaries in black. In case there are two options of a valid boundary but both are not possible (as in your case) MM chooses the group with the lower FaceGroupID. In your case: White is the group "zero". All other groups get their number by history. The first group you create gets something like "1" as ID, the second "2" ....
To change the behaviour of which group boundary is treated as valid in case of a conflict you simply need to change its order. In your case: Select the white group (ID = "0") after you did the orange (ID = "X") and do Modify/CreateFaceGroup. This creates a new group (ID = "X+x" - means done after "X"). Now the Complex tool will highlight the boundary of the orange group and create the interior surface there.
As said: Your example can't work if you think about joining stuff later....
Think I should write a book 😉
Anyone interested?