Community
Inventor Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Inventor Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Inventor topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

"Loose" Loft

9 REPLIES 9
Reply
Message 1 of 10
Anonymous
668 Views, 9 Replies

"Loose" Loft

Hello everybody,

 

I'm new to Inventor (used to Rhino 3D) and was wondering whether there is some kind of function like the loose loft in Rhino?

 

When lofting over several section curves in Rhino, the loft command allows the user to handle how every section is treated. If a "loose" loft is created, the section curves are not met 100% by the created loft. They have some kind of influence however (like they are "pulling" with a certain weight at the surface). Is there some kind of function in Inventor as well?

 

Cheers

9 REPLIES 9
Message 2 of 10
CCarreiras
in reply to: Anonymous

Hi!!

 

Yes.

 

You can add new sketch rails to influence the loft between profiles.

you can add tangency with "variable force" at the start and end of the loft in loft conditions tab

You can tweak how the profiles connect beteewn in the loft transitions tab

CCarreiras

EESignature

Message 3 of 10
PaulMunford
in reply to: Anonymous

There is no option to control the inner curvature of a loft in inventor (i.e. at the lofted profiles).

You might be better off reducing the number of profiles and controlling the curvature with a center line loft?

 


Autodesk Marketing Manager D&M
Opinions are my own and may not reflect those of my company.
Linkedin Twitter Instagram Facebook Pinterest

Message 4 of 10
Anonymous
in reply to: PaulMunford

@PaulMunford Controlling the shape by a centerline unfortunately is not really an option for my project. It really seems that Rhino has done something here that no other software is capable of doing...

Message 5 of 10
PaulMunford
in reply to: Anonymous

Well - if you want approximations, maybe!

 

Inventor is designed to give highly precise outputs - which demand highly precise inputs.

 

Post your part file with details of the problem you are trying to solve and we'll see if we can help you further.

 

Paul

 


Autodesk Marketing Manager D&M
Opinions are my own and may not reflect those of my company.
Linkedin Twitter Instagram Facebook Pinterest

Message 6 of 10
Anonymous
in reply to: PaulMunford

@PaulMunford Paul, thanks for your help. Much appreciated!

 

I can't post the part-file right now, since I'm using a different computer.

 

I am aware of the fact that most CAD programs try to be as precise as possible (which obviously is their main purpose).

 

What I need to do is, to be "unprecise on purpose" in shape creation. Meaning: I want to create a surface that goes roughly through section curves (splines). After creating that surface, I need to be able to edit the weight of each section (=how it influences or "pulls" the surface).

 

Up to this point I would be better off with some sort of design software. However, now I want to use this surface in a parametric CAD model to create complex projects including this shape. Therefore, I need the shape to be parametric (=not a "dead" surface) so if I change it later on, everything I've created after that point changes as well.

 

Any ideas?

Message 7 of 10
TheCADWhisperer
in reply to: Anonymous

If you are using a later version of Inventor - you might want to investigate the Form tools.

Message 8 of 10
PaulMunford
in reply to: Anonymous

That's not to difficult.

 

I think that it just takes an adjustment in thinking. In Inventor we would make the geometry precise, and then add randomness by adjusting the parameter values.

 

I've put together an example screenshare showing how this might work.

 

It is a rig of splines controlling a lofted surface. Each spline node has the option to adjust it's height, angle and weighting.

 

I've used an iLogic form to control the parametric values - you don't have to do this but it does allow you a nice workflow to make adjustments visually.

 

 

 


Autodesk Marketing Manager D&M
Opinions are my own and may not reflect those of my company.
Linkedin Twitter Instagram Facebook Pinterest

Message 9 of 10
Anonymous
in reply to: PaulMunford

@PaulMunford thanks again for your help.

 

I've had a good look at the video and your answer and I think that you already pointed out the mayor issue: Making the geometry precise and then adding randomness.

 

For what I'm intending to do, this approach is backwards and defeats the purpose (e.g. faired, smooth surfaces would be much harder to achieve, since they would require much more work)

Message 10 of 10
PaulMunford
in reply to: Anonymous

Well, If you can post a example of what you need to achieve (In Rhino format if necessary) we will see if we can help you further.

 


Autodesk Marketing Manager D&M
Opinions are my own and may not reflect those of my company.
Linkedin Twitter Instagram Facebook Pinterest

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report