Problem with Inventor 2019, Make Component

Problem with Inventor 2019, Make Component

Anonymous
Not applicable
6,483 Views
26 Replies
Message 1 of 27

Problem with Inventor 2019, Make Component

Anonymous
Not applicable

We are using Inventor for a few years. The tool "Make Component" is very usefull to us. We design a multibody part, and with the command "Make Component" we create all the parts in a specific template. Every solid becomes a part. In every part there is just one solid. I did the same procedure in Inventor 2019 but now in every part there are all the solids again, this must be a program failure, or am i missing something? In 2018 we mirrored several solids in the part with different sheetmetal rules, through "Make Component" the sheetmetal rule could not be transferred for every solid, every part got the sheetmetal rule of the first mirrored solid. Fortunately this is solved in 2019, that's good.

I hope there is a solution for the Inventor 2019 "Make Component" tool.

 

Thanks in advance.

Accepted solutions (1)
6,484 Views
26 Replies
Replies (26)
Message 2 of 27

JDMather
Consultant
Consultant

I am not seeing the behavior that you describe.

Can you post example files that exhibit this behavior?


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Autodesk Inventor 2019 Certified Professional
Autodesk AutoCAD 2013 Certified Professional
Certified SolidWorks Professional


0 Likes
Message 3 of 27

Xun.Zhang
Alumni
Alumni

Hello,

I am not seeing it either, could you help upload a multi-body part sample here or a shot video for more details?

Thanks!


Xun
0 Likes
Message 4 of 27

Anonymous
Not applicable

Hello again,

 

Attached there is a word doc where you can see the procedure and outcome.

Every part is derived and shows every Solid, because they are all selected (edit derived part).

In previous versions of Inventor there was just the correct solid selected, one part, one solid.

 

Marco

0 Likes
Message 5 of 27

Xun.Zhang
Alumni
Alumni
Hello, No luck to reproduce it in my end. Just one more try, could you retry with standard sheetmetal template for the workflow? Thanks!

Xun
0 Likes
Message 6 of 27

johnsonshiue
Community Manager
Community Manager

Hi! It looks like you are using custom template as the base for the derive parts. Could you share the files you showed in the Word doc? I suspect it is related to the template you use.

Many thanks!

 



Johnson Shiue ([email protected])
Software Test Engineer
0 Likes
Message 7 of 27

Anonymous
Not applicable

Hello, i have just tried the same procedure with a standard template, it gives the same wrong result.

The templates we use are made from standard templates, so it would be strange that it would give a different outcome.

 

Can it be a windows register issue? For example, the default setting for the option “Use color override from source component” in the Derive Part dialog is also changeable by register setting.

 

Marco de Kort

0 Likes
Message 8 of 27

Anonymous
Not applicable

In earlier versions of Inventor 2018, 2017, 2014 we used custom templates, it worked perfectly.

There must be something wrong in a Inventor setting or windows setting, installation issue, program failure.

I will install Inventor 2019 on a different computer tomorrow and see if i get a different result.

 

Marco de Kort

0 Likes
Message 9 of 27

Xun.Zhang
Alumni
Alumni

Hi,

In this case, it's real hard to direct to the root cause without data, could you help Pack and Go with all design data and template with the multi-body part together and send to us for more investigation?

You can reach me via email [email protected].

 

Thanks!


Xun
0 Likes
Message 10 of 27

Xun.Zhang
Alumni
Alumni
Accepted solution

Hi Macro,

 

The data was well-received, thanks for sharing.

Do you remember how you’ve created it from scratch? It seems that not able to produce the same in my end when create a file from scratch. Anyway, yes, this is a defect and the reason is a bit unclear for me, ticket INVGEN-14520 was filed to track it down.

 

Thanks!


Xun
Message 11 of 27

Anonymous
Not applicable

Hello this is in reply to ticket INVGEN-14520 regarding the Make Component in 2019.  I too have had this issue and tried to reply on the board but for some reason can only reply via private message?  Anyway I believe the issue relies in the view representation settings?  If I try and make components within another view representation selected, it will create a single part with all those parts visible in that active representation.  But if i make components while in the master representation view then all solid bodies(parts) come in as separate parts.  I am running Windows 7.  Not sure if that makes a difference but thought i would share.  

 

Thank you for you time and I hope this helps others.  If you have any further questions feel free to email me:)

 

Tina 

Message 12 of 27

Anonymous
Not applicable

Hi Xun,

 

As written in the last post by Tina, the problem lies in the view representation.

The behaviour of the make component tool is as normal if you run it in the master presentation.

If you use the default or any other new custom presentation then the tool put's in all bodies in every part.

This is a program failure, i hope it can be solved.

We make presentations of a collection of bodies for every type of material, like plate, tube, bars etc and put the bodies in specific templates.

 

Marco de Kort

 

Message 13 of 27

Anonymous
Not applicable

I don't really understand why this works, but it works.

Thank you.

 


@Anonymouswrote:

Hello this is in reply to ticket INVGEN-14520 regarding the Make Component in 2019.  I too have had this issue and tried to reply on the board but for some reason can only reply via private message?  Anyway I believe the issue relies in the view representation settings?  If I try and make components within another view representation selected, it will create a single part with all those parts visible in that active representation.  But if i make components while in the master representation view then all solid bodies(parts) come in as separate parts.  I am running Windows 7.  Not sure if that makes a difference but thought i would share.  

 

Thank you for you time and I hope this helps others.  If you have any further questions feel free to email me:)

 

Tina 


 

0 Likes
Message 14 of 27

Xun.Zhang
Alumni
Alumni

Hello Marco de Kort,

Thank you so much to narrow down the reason which is great help for further investigation.


Xun
0 Likes
Message 15 of 27

Anonymous
Not applicable

Hi Xun

 

Where do we go to track tickets?

 

thank you!

 

-Joe

0 Likes
Message 16 of 27

kelly.young
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

Hello @Anonymous you can access information about tickets by using Search through public AKN articles here:

Autodesk Knowledge Network

 

If it doesn't show up in the search you would need to contact Autodesk directly to inquire about the status.

Contact Support

 

If it is a ticket you have personally submitted you can access the status here:

Submitting & Viewing Support Requests

 

Please select the Accept as Solution button if a post solves your issue or answers your question.

0 Likes
Message 17 of 27

Xun.Zhang
Alumni
Alumni

Hi Joe,

The most recent accumulative update (2019.1) would possibly include the fix as I can predict, but not pretty sure.

Please active master view before make component as a bypass until the fix delivered.

Thanks!


Xun
Message 18 of 27

Anonymous
Not applicable

I have inventor pro but the latest update shows for autocad. Is it combined in with this? (picture below)Capture.PNG

0 Likes
Message 19 of 27

johnsonshiue
Community Manager
Community Manager

Hi! No, AutoCAD and Inventor are two different products. The updates are not mutually inclusive. You have to install updates for each product respectively.

Many thanks!



Johnson Shiue ([email protected])
Software Test Engineer
0 Likes
Message 20 of 27

Anonymous
Not applicable
Yeah I know that a comment just generally stated an update , i have all the latest Inventor updates so I’ll just have to be patient for the fix
0 Likes