One important consideration that I think is worth keeping in mind:
Trying to do FEA on a 3D printed model should be taken with an extremely large grain of salt.
I would assume that the reason that ABS is available is that it's used primarily as an injection-molded material. This has process variability to be sure, but can be considered much closer to a homogenous piece with more isotropic properties. FDM, by it's nature, depends on adhesion between multiple layers of material that are fused essentially by gravity and heat.
What sort of printer are you using? How accurate is the hot end temperature control? What size nozzle? What's the environmental control near the print head? Did a cool breeze just blow through the room? What are the effects of any of these variables on the overall strength? I don't know, either - but I'd be willing to bet they have an effect.
Doing FEA on composite layups, the math becomes complex very quickly. Personally, I don't know how meaningful simulation on PLA parts really is, only because it's probably dependent on all of the above variables much more than the material properties itself. It would be interesting, but I wouldn't trust it very far in an engineering sense.
I'm not saying it can't be done. Just raising at least a yellow flag to be careful about using a $500 printer to print PLA parts and assuming they're good 'because the FEA said so'.
Todd
Product Design Collection (Inventor Pro, 3DSMax, HSMWorks)
Fusion 360 / Fusion Team