Leader annotation pulls part number from part rather than assembly

Leader annotation pulls part number from part rather than assembly

38ten.pq
Explorer Explorer
1,307 Views
3 Replies
Message 1 of 4

Leader annotation pulls part number from part rather than assembly

38ten.pq
Explorer
Explorer

Hi Folks,

I'm using the Add text parameter to pull in the part number of an assembly in a leader annotation. My problem is that the part is referenced rather than the assembly that is the subject of the drawing and forms the base view on the sheet.  A different sheet correctly references the sub assemblies of a larger assembly when using the auto balloon feature so it feel like a BOM structure issue but don't know where I can change that?

 

Any ideas?

1,308 Views
3 Replies
Replies (3)
Message 2 of 4

-niels-
Mentor
Mentor
I'm confused, are you using a leader or a balloon?

If using a balloon, then it might be because of the assembly being expanded in the parts list if you're using a "structured" BOM.

If you are using a leader, then i'd have to test your procedure so it'd be nice if you could give a bit more detail.
I'm not 100% sure, but i think you can't reference the main subject of a view with leaders.
You can add referenced data of the main subject in a view label though...

Niels van der Veer
Inventor professional user & 3DS Max enthusiast
Vault professional user/manager
The Netherlands

0 Likes
Message 3 of 4

mcgyvr
Consultant
Consultant

Thats just how Inventor works when using leaders..

Vote here to show support for adding functionality to allow you to pull from the assembly with a leader..

https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-ideas/improve-leader-text-to-pull-subassembly-iproperties/id...

 



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inventor 2023 - Dell Precision 5570

Did you find this reply helpful ? If so please use the Accept Solution button below.
Maybe buy me a beer through Venmo @mcgyvr1269
Message 4 of 4

38ten.pq
Explorer
Explorer

I thought this was going to be the case! Voted for the feature but it looks like it's stale sadly.


Thanks both!