Here is my interpretation of the part based on the single .jpg print.
This version is not bent double, because the print does not show that information.
I used two user parameters for the Rod Diameter and the Rod Bend Radius to build the part. That way I could use those parameters in different dimension equations or in different sketches to control the part geometry. I guessed that the rod was 0.25 diameter with a 0.5 centerline bend radius.
I planned my model so that the origin work planes would be useful when I assemble the rod to the rest of the components in the design. I used construction lines and dimension equations so that the sweep path has the same dimension scheme as the .jpg drawing. If I am modeling an object from an existing print, I tend to build the sketches and features with the same dimensions. I think modeling that way helps me capture the original designer's intent. I also think that it is easier for me to compare my model to the 2d print.

I created the "Rod Profile Sketch Plane" using the Normal to Curve at a Point workplane command. https://help.autodesk.com/view/INVNTOR/2024/ENU/?guid=GUID-38A9748E-FA2D-44D3-928C-DFE1326A9385
Steve Walton
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

Inventor 2025
Vault Professional 2025