Hi guys,
We have had to do some testing on a bunch of Inventor PC's recently to determine which of the PC's needs to be replaced. Obviously we needed to find out which of the PC's are the worst eprformers as there was only budget to replace 50% of the design PC's. So we thought the Darwin theory will come in handy right... 🙂
Anyways I started searching on the net for toppics on how to benchmark an Inventor PC. Then I thought whats the point of using gaming benchmark tools because Inventor is not a game and there are more aspects than just graphics performance when it comes to percieved performance on an Inventor PC right.
So we decided to create our own Inventor benchmark tool which tests various aspects of an Inventor PC to give us an overview of our PC's performance. This then helped us make a decision as to whcih pc's to replace.
We have made the tool available free of charge to anyone interested in checking how their PC stacks up to their peers or friends. 🙂
Please download it here and post your results here as well if you want. Would be interesting to see what beast workstations are out there.
I would like to say thanks to Kirk #karthur1, for helping in testing the app.
Please feel free to send any suggestions our way. There is an email link in the app.
The application will work with Inventor 2014 to 2016 only.
IMPORTANT: After installation there will be an Inventor Bench icon on your desktop that looks like this:
My resluts:
HP Elitebook 8560w with an SSD upgrade.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Solved by Neil_Cross. Go to Solution.
Solved by Raider_71. Go to Solution.
Solved by Raider_71. Go to Solution.
Solved by Raider_71. Go to Solution.
there is alot wrong here.
We open our assembly's from a server. (Our biggest assembly has over the 100.000 parts this takes alot of time to open....)
I had suggest by our IT to putt SSD cards in our stations, but they don't whan't it because SSD's have a shorter lifetime than a HDD.
We proposed to install Vault on our system for reducing our waiting time.
They don't wan't because they don't know the software and to instal the software:(
my benchmark pc Home.
i made 2 benchmarks, i have a 24 inch 1080p monitor, and a 27 inch 4k monitor the difference are insane
1080p monitor
4k monitor
It's a little misleading because of the IPI score being affected so much by individual tests. All your other tests perform the same or better,but because just the graphics test is so different it weighs the final score back too much. That's something the test creator is working on for v2.0 of the test
Oke thanks!
What is the effect of the Displayport, i bought displayport 1.3/1.4 a couple of days ago and changed it after my to benchmarks with the 1080p and 4k monitor.
The different between the first and the second benchmark on my 4k monitor is also insane.
I can conclude that a good displayport also can make a big different?
4k 27" Displayport 1.4
4k 27" Displayport 1.2
1080p 24" HDMI
Look at your pictures again... the tests aren't running at the same resolution. That is what is causing the difference.
@mechielvanvalen wrote:Oke thanks!
What is the effect of the Displayport, i bought displayport 1.3/1.4 a couple of days ago and changed it after my to benchmarks with the 1080p and 4k monitor.
The different between the first and the second benchmark on my 4k monitor is also insane.
I can conclude that a good displayport also can make a big different?
It's been a while since I've been able to sit at the desk for long enough to do any serious work with Inventor, but ... with a clean reinstall of Windows, Office and Product Design Suite, I've been getting some absolutely horrible performance.
Here's three test runs. First two are my current workstation. One at 1080p, the other at 4k. Hardware isn't the problem, that's for sure. This is all very good stuff. The speed shown for the CPU is a bit low, though: the XMP profile to get the full speed out of my RAM boosts the CPU multiplier by a bit, so it's running at a constant 3875 mHz. Third one is my old workstation. (Granted, the test is a couple years old, and was on Inventor 2016 rather than 2018, but still.)
It feels pretty responsive while it's running... but wow. That warm start time.
Current machine:
i7-6800k w/Corsair H110i water cooling (small OC to ~3.9 gHz)
Asus X99-E motherboard
32GB Adata DDR4-3000
EVGA GTX-1080ti SC2 Hybrid (slight factory overclock, water cooling)
System Disk: Samsung 850 Pro, 512 GB
Data and App disks: 3x Samsung 850 Evo, 500 GB. WD Black 1TB platter disk. External WD 3TB MyBook, WD 8TB EasyStore
Corsair RM-750i power supply
Old Machine:
i7-4770k, Corsair H100i water cooling (stock clocks)
Asus Z-87 Pro motherboard
32 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1600
Sapphire Radeon R9-270X (4GB)
System Disk: Samsung 850 Evo, 500 GB
Data and Apps: Samsung 840 Pro (250), mixed WD Black platter drives
Corsair 1kw PSU, though I can't remember the model number
Man. I just can't get over how long it takes to load, and how marginal the difference is between the old and new system setups. This is a machine that can play Battlefront II in 4k at 60+ fps with no problems... yet it's this pathetic running Inventor. 😕
Rusty
I'm running at 3.6ghz (7700 [non-k] no-oc) and avg about 10.4 on the test.
@Neil_Cross wrote:
... I don't think anyone has passed a score of 10 without being clocked at over 4ghz
I managed a 11.18 with my machine that's now 2-years old. No overclocking. Just running the default-stock settings.
So I just purchased a new computer with the following specification.
I've had to put my old graphics card in it which is a classic vintage NVIDIA Geforce GT 620 with a humungas 1Gb VRAM.
I feel like I've put diesel fuel into my Ferrari, however it's only until my NEW graphics card arrives, hopefully any day now, which is an AMD Radeon WX3100.
I purchased this card because @Neil_Cross gave it a fair wrap. I will post updated benchmark results when the new card gets here.
Below are my results with the old card, pretty crap huh,
Yep the WX3100 is pretty solid, you'll not hit any bottlenecks with it in Inventor. I think I posted a bench test with it, achieved the same results in this synthetic test as it did in my large assembly testing. If you don't see a significant improvement, you should, but if you don't... post it here and I'll compare to my card. I can put the WX3100 into my system again and re-run the test to compare.
Thanks @Neil_Cross, you are an absolute legend, I shall keep you updated.
Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.