Community
Inventor Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Inventor Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Inventor topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

For your consideration

17 REPLIES 17
SOLVED
Reply
Message 1 of 18
Anonymous
965 Views, 17 Replies

For your consideration

Anonymous
Not applicable

Hi everyone, 

 

I am trying to create this curved surface wit multiple radii on autodesk inventor 2017, but I am unable to do so. I have attached the file with encircled areas aswell, kindly guide me on how to create a curved surface with multiple radii. Thanks

 

0 Likes

For your consideration

Hi everyone, 

 

I am trying to create this curved surface wit multiple radii on autodesk inventor 2017, but I am unable to do so. I have attached the file with encircled areas aswell, kindly guide me on how to create a curved surface with multiple radii. Thanks

 

17 REPLIES 17
Message 2 of 18
Mark.Lancaster
in reply to: Anonymous

Mark.Lancaster
Consultant
Consultant

@Anonymous

 

Welcome to the community..

 

First when posting you should always indicated what version of Inventor you are using so others can provide examples in the version of Inventor you're using.

 

Next post what you have so far and we can look at your sketches and the progress you have already done.

Mark Lancaster


  &  Autodesk Services MarketPlace Provider


Autodesk Inventor Certified Professional & not an Autodesk Employee


Likes is much appreciated if the information I have shared is helpful to you and/or others


Did this resolve your issue? Please accept it "As a Solution" so others may benefit from it.

0 Likes

@Anonymous

 

Welcome to the community..

 

First when posting you should always indicated what version of Inventor you are using so others can provide examples in the version of Inventor you're using.

 

Next post what you have so far and we can look at your sketches and the progress you have already done.

Mark Lancaster


  &  Autodesk Services MarketPlace Provider


Autodesk Inventor Certified Professional & not an Autodesk Employee


Likes is much appreciated if the information I have shared is helpful to you and/or others


Did this resolve your issue? Please accept it "As a Solution" so others may benefit from it.

Message 3 of 18
johnsonshiue
in reply to: Anonymous

johnsonshiue
Community Manager
Community Manager

Hi! This should be doable in Inventor. If I were you, I would just do one half due to symmetry. Then focus on straight segments first. Make sure scale is correct. Then you will need to create a series of arcs. These arcs will need to be tangent to the neighbors. Let us know you run into any issue.

Many thanks!

 



Johnson Shiue (johnson.shiue@autodesk.com)
Software Test Engineer

Hi! This should be doable in Inventor. If I were you, I would just do one half due to symmetry. Then focus on straight segments first. Make sure scale is correct. Then you will need to create a series of arcs. These arcs will need to be tangent to the neighbors. Let us know you run into any issue.

Many thanks!

 



Johnson Shiue (johnson.shiue@autodesk.com)
Software Test Engineer
Message 4 of 18
mdavis22569
in reply to: johnsonshiue

mdavis22569
Mentor
Mentor

I've started it ..but it's snowing in NC my son wants to play .. however here is a start, the R300 is fully done here 

 

Rail Sketch.PNG

The 2 600 is to show you 1 full 600 diameter circle sketch I started with....

 

You have a C/L of 80mm for the R300, this is important ..

 

I'm working on the top part now ..

 

But you never mentioned what version you are on ...


Did you find this reply helpful ? If so please use the Accept as Solution or Kudos button below.

---------
Mike Davis

EESignature

I've started it ..but it's snowing in NC my son wants to play .. however here is a start, the R300 is fully done here 

 

Rail Sketch.PNG

The 2 600 is to show you 1 full 600 diameter circle sketch I started with....

 

You have a C/L of 80mm for the R300, this is important ..

 

I'm working on the top part now ..

 

But you never mentioned what version you are on ...


Did you find this reply helpful ? If so please use the Accept as Solution or Kudos button below.

---------
Mike Davis

EESignature

Message 5 of 18
TheCADWhisperer
in reply to: Anonymous

TheCADWhisperer
Consultant
Consultant

I had to make an assumption about the location of the R35.

 

Rail Sketch.png

 

I would add the fillets at the base after Extruding.

I had to make an assumption about the location of the R35.

 

Rail Sketch.png

 

I would add the fillets at the base after Extruding.

Message 6 of 18
IgorMir
in reply to: Mark.Lancaster

IgorMir
Mentor
Mentor

Hi Mark,

The OP is using IV2017. He mentioned it in his post.

Cheers,

Igor.

 


@Mark.Lancaster wrote:

@Anonymous

 

Welcome to the community..

 

First when posting you should always indicated what version of Inventor you are using so others can provide examples in the version of Inventor you're using.

 

Web: www.meqc.com.au
0 Likes

Hi Mark,

The OP is using IV2017. He mentioned it in his post.

Cheers,

Igor.

 


@Mark.Lancaster wrote:

@Anonymous

 

Welcome to the community..

 

First when posting you should always indicated what version of Inventor you are using so others can provide examples in the version of Inventor you're using.

 

Web: www.meqc.com.au
Message 7 of 18
Mark.Lancaster
in reply to: IgorMir

Mark.Lancaster
Consultant
Consultant

@IgorMir

 

Yes, but you are now seeing the updated posting after the OP edited it after I replied...  Smiley Very Happy 

Mark Lancaster


  &  Autodesk Services MarketPlace Provider


Autodesk Inventor Certified Professional & not an Autodesk Employee


Likes is much appreciated if the information I have shared is helpful to you and/or others


Did this resolve your issue? Please accept it "As a Solution" so others may benefit from it.

0 Likes

@IgorMir

 

Yes, but you are now seeing the updated posting after the OP edited it after I replied...  Smiley Very Happy 

Mark Lancaster


  &  Autodesk Services MarketPlace Provider


Autodesk Inventor Certified Professional & not an Autodesk Employee


Likes is much appreciated if the information I have shared is helpful to you and/or others


Did this resolve your issue? Please accept it "As a Solution" so others may benefit from it.

Message 8 of 18
Anonymous
in reply to: johnsonshiue

Anonymous
Not applicable

Hi,

 

Thanks for the reply. I have done this so far (please see the attached file). I have calculated the dimensions from the given ratios (1 in 4 and 1 in 20). However, I am not certain that I am on the right path or not. Kindly, have a look on the progress I have made so far. Also, I am still confused on how to achieve the curve at the top of the rail. Please assist me on that as well in a bit more detail. I am also attaching a detailed drawing of the rail (file name Rail drawing) as well. please don't worry about the holes in the drawing they are not under consideration. 

 

I'm looking forward your reply.

 

Cheers

0 Likes

Hi,

 

Thanks for the reply. I have done this so far (please see the attached file). I have calculated the dimensions from the given ratios (1 in 4 and 1 in 20). However, I am not certain that I am on the right path or not. Kindly, have a look on the progress I have made so far. Also, I am still confused on how to achieve the curve at the top of the rail. Please assist me on that as well in a bit more detail. I am also attaching a detailed drawing of the rail (file name Rail drawing) as well. please don't worry about the holes in the drawing they are not under consideration. 

 

I'm looking forward your reply.

 

Cheers

Message 9 of 18
Anonymous
in reply to: TheCADWhisperer

Anonymous
Not applicable

Hi,

 

Thanks for trying that, I don't know how you did it, but it's really impressive. I have also tried doing it but i'm not sure if I on the right track or not. I am also attaching my .ipt and .stp drawing files and the original drawing of the rail, so you could have better understanding. Kindly, assist me with my drawing as it is part of my thesis and my entire project is based on how accurate the rail model is. 

 

I am looking forward your reply.

 

Thanks

0 Likes

Hi,

 

Thanks for trying that, I don't know how you did it, but it's really impressive. I have also tried doing it but i'm not sure if I on the right track or not. I am also attaching my .ipt and .stp drawing files and the original drawing of the rail, so you could have better understanding. Kindly, assist me with my drawing as it is part of my thesis and my entire project is based on how accurate the rail model is. 

 

I am looking forward your reply.

 

Thanks

Message 10 of 18
Mark.Lancaster
in reply to: Anonymous

Mark.Lancaster
Consultant
Consultant

@Anonymous

 

You should be posting your actual Inventor file and not always an image... 

Nevermind, I just saw we posted at the same time.

 

3-12-2017 10-59-00 PM.jpg3-12-2017 10-57-52 PM.jpg

 

First all your dimensions are not even matching the design.  Look at the radius dimension..  You have a 600R mm radius and the design calls for 300R mm

Mark Lancaster


  &  Autodesk Services MarketPlace Provider


Autodesk Inventor Certified Professional & not an Autodesk Employee


Likes is much appreciated if the information I have shared is helpful to you and/or others


Did this resolve your issue? Please accept it "As a Solution" so others may benefit from it.

0 Likes

@Anonymous

 

You should be posting your actual Inventor file and not always an image... 

Nevermind, I just saw we posted at the same time.

 

3-12-2017 10-59-00 PM.jpg3-12-2017 10-57-52 PM.jpg

 

First all your dimensions are not even matching the design.  Look at the radius dimension..  You have a 600R mm radius and the design calls for 300R mm

Mark Lancaster


  &  Autodesk Services MarketPlace Provider


Autodesk Inventor Certified Professional & not an Autodesk Employee


Likes is much appreciated if the information I have shared is helpful to you and/or others


Did this resolve your issue? Please accept it "As a Solution" so others may benefit from it.

Message 11 of 18
Anonymous
in reply to: Mark.Lancaster

Anonymous
Not applicable

Hi,

 

No the 600mm is the diameter.

0 Likes

Hi,

 

No the 600mm is the diameter.

Message 12 of 18
Anonymous
in reply to: Mark.Lancaster

Anonymous
Not applicable

Hi @Mark.Lancaster,

 

Please find attached the inventor files.

 

Cheers

 

0 Likes

Hi @Mark.Lancaster,

 

Please find attached the inventor files.

 

Cheers

 

Message 13 of 18
Mark.Lancaster
in reply to: Anonymous

Mark.Lancaster
Consultant
Consultant
Accepted solution

@Anonymous

 

Sorry I thought that was a radial dimension in the image..  Smiley Wink   It was hard to tell with just a clipped image.. But then noticed after you provided the actual part.

 

Although there are other ways of doing this and @TheCADWhisperer showed you a way..  But look at my sketch 1 of Extrusion 1..  Look how I laid it out and I don't worry about the fillets.   At first I was going to break it up in 3 sketches even to simplify it.   Like one sketch for the base, one for the middle section and another sketch for the top portion.  In the end keep it simple since this part has a lot of radius in the upper section.

 

Update:  Sorry posted the wrong one..  Look at the updated Extrusion part.

Update #1:  I guess I shouldn't be designing parts at midnight..  Smiley Sad  The 300 radius geometry was not constrained (tanget) and missing the dimension.  So look at the new one I attached.  Sorry..  Going to bed and closing my eyes and no more designing at this hour..  Smiley Very Happy

 

 

Mark Lancaster


  &  Autodesk Services MarketPlace Provider


Autodesk Inventor Certified Professional & not an Autodesk Employee


Likes is much appreciated if the information I have shared is helpful to you and/or others


Did this resolve your issue? Please accept it "As a Solution" so others may benefit from it.

@Anonymous

 

Sorry I thought that was a radial dimension in the image..  Smiley Wink   It was hard to tell with just a clipped image.. But then noticed after you provided the actual part.

 

Although there are other ways of doing this and @TheCADWhisperer showed you a way..  But look at my sketch 1 of Extrusion 1..  Look how I laid it out and I don't worry about the fillets.   At first I was going to break it up in 3 sketches even to simplify it.   Like one sketch for the base, one for the middle section and another sketch for the top portion.  In the end keep it simple since this part has a lot of radius in the upper section.

 

Update:  Sorry posted the wrong one..  Look at the updated Extrusion part.

Update #1:  I guess I shouldn't be designing parts at midnight..  Smiley Sad  The 300 radius geometry was not constrained (tanget) and missing the dimension.  So look at the new one I attached.  Sorry..  Going to bed and closing my eyes and no more designing at this hour..  Smiley Very Happy

 

 

Mark Lancaster


  &  Autodesk Services MarketPlace Provider


Autodesk Inventor Certified Professional & not an Autodesk Employee


Likes is much appreciated if the information I have shared is helpful to you and/or others


Did this resolve your issue? Please accept it "As a Solution" so others may benefit from it.

Message 14 of 18
IgorMir
in reply to: Mark.Lancaster

IgorMir
Mentor
Mentor
Accepted solution

Ah, I see... I noticed the message was edited but I didn't know the inventor version was added to it. 🙂

Cheers,

Igor.

 


@Mark.Lancaster wrote:

@IgorMir

 

Yes, but you are now seeing the updated posting after the OP edited it after I replied...  Smiley Very Happy 

 

Web: www.meqc.com.au

Ah, I see... I noticed the message was edited but I didn't know the inventor version was added to it. 🙂

Cheers,

Igor.

 


@Mark.Lancaster wrote:

@IgorMir

 

Yes, but you are now seeing the updated posting after the OP edited it after I replied...  Smiley Very Happy 

 

Web: www.meqc.com.au
Message 15 of 18
IgorMir
in reply to: Anonymous

IgorMir
Mentor
Mentor

Here is what I can offer. Please see the attached file in IV2010 format.

Where in Australia are you?

Cheers,

Igor.

 


@Anonymous wrote:

Hi,

 

Thanks for trying that, I don't know how you did it, but it's really impressive. I have also tried doing it but i'm not sure if I on the right track or not. I am also attaching my .ipt and .stp drawing files and the original drawing of the rail, so you could have better understanding. Kindly, assist me with my drawing as it is part of my thesis and my entire project is based on how accurate the rail model is. 

 

I am looking forward your reply.

 

Thanks

 

Web: www.meqc.com.au

Here is what I can offer. Please see the attached file in IV2010 format.

Where in Australia are you?

Cheers,

Igor.

 


@Anonymous wrote:

Hi,

 

Thanks for trying that, I don't know how you did it, but it's really impressive. I have also tried doing it but i'm not sure if I on the right track or not. I am also attaching my .ipt and .stp drawing files and the original drawing of the rail, so you could have better understanding. Kindly, assist me with my drawing as it is part of my thesis and my entire project is based on how accurate the rail model is. 

 

I am looking forward your reply.

 

Thanks

 

Web: www.meqc.com.au
Message 16 of 18
Anonymous
in reply to: IgorMir

Anonymous
Not applicable

Hi,

 

Thanks so much for the help. I really appreciate it mate. I'm from Sydney 🙂 .

 

Cheers

0 Likes

Hi,

 

Thanks so much for the help. I really appreciate it mate. I'm from Sydney 🙂 .

 

Cheers

Message 17 of 18
IgorMir
in reply to: Anonymous

IgorMir
Mentor
Mentor

You are welcome.

I am from Perth. Opposite site of the continent... 🙂

Cheers,

Igor.

 


@Anonymous wrote:

Hi,

 

Thanks so much for the help. I really appreciate it mate. I'm from Sydney 🙂 .

 

Cheers

 

Web: www.meqc.com.au
0 Likes

You are welcome.

I am from Perth. Opposite site of the continent... 🙂

Cheers,

Igor.

 


@Anonymous wrote:

Hi,

 

Thanks so much for the help. I really appreciate it mate. I'm from Sydney 🙂 .

 

Cheers

 

Web: www.meqc.com.au
Message 18 of 18
TheCADWhisperer
in reply to: Anonymous

TheCADWhisperer
Consultant
Consultant

@Anonymous wrote:

.... my entire project is based on how accurate the rail model is. 

 


Why did you not supply the detail view in the original post?

Your dimensions do not match the drawing dimensions - don't do calculations, use the geometry information.

 

0 Likes


@Anonymous wrote:

.... my entire project is based on how accurate the rail model is. 

 


Why did you not supply the detail view in the original post?

Your dimensions do not match the drawing dimensions - don't do calculations, use the geometry information.

 

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report