Community
Inventor Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Inventor Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Inventor topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

FEA Error - "Regularization Failed"

6 REPLIES 6
Reply
Message 1 of 7
Anonymous
3553 Views, 6 Replies

FEA Error - "Regularization Failed"

Anonymous
Not applicable

Doing a static load analysis - nothing fancy here. Getting a "Internal Error: Regularization Failed" error.

 

Happens when I do Automatic Contacts or try to run the simulation.

 

What the heck does that mean & how is it fixed?

 

Thanks to anyone who can help here.

0 Likes

FEA Error - "Regularization Failed"

Doing a static load analysis - nothing fancy here. Getting a "Internal Error: Regularization Failed" error.

 

Happens when I do Automatic Contacts or try to run the simulation.

 

What the heck does that mean & how is it fixed?

 

Thanks to anyone who can help here.

6 REPLIES 6
Message 2 of 7
jalger
in reply to: Anonymous

jalger
Collaborator
Collaborator

Hi Marshallw,

 

I Have seen this before with Thin Bodies, Try Running the "Thin Bodies" Command to identify any parts that MIGHT be considered Thin.

I Think its a problem with the Mesh, you could also try change the local Mesh settings on the member that might be considered thin.

The only Other time I have seen something like this was with a "home made" Material and someone forgot to add the Physical Properties.

 

Not sure if either of those help, but those are the only two times I have seen a "Regularization error".

 

Regards,

 

James

James Alger
(I'm on several hundred posts as "algerj")

Work:
Dell Precision 5530 (Xeon E 2176M)
1tb SSD, 64GB RAM
Nvidia Quadro P2000, Win10

Hi Marshallw,

 

I Have seen this before with Thin Bodies, Try Running the "Thin Bodies" Command to identify any parts that MIGHT be considered Thin.

I Think its a problem with the Mesh, you could also try change the local Mesh settings on the member that might be considered thin.

The only Other time I have seen something like this was with a "home made" Material and someone forgot to add the Physical Properties.

 

Not sure if either of those help, but those are the only two times I have seen a "Regularization error".

 

Regards,

 

James

James Alger
(I'm on several hundred posts as "algerj")

Work:
Dell Precision 5530 (Xeon E 2176M)
1tb SSD, 64GB RAM
Nvidia Quadro P2000, Win10
Message 3 of 7
Anonymous
in reply to: jalger

Anonymous
Not applicable
Might be the mesh -- I'll give that a try -- don't think there are any exotic materials in the assembly.

Thanks
0 Likes

Might be the mesh -- I'll give that a try -- don't think there are any exotic materials in the assembly.

Thanks
Message 4 of 7
raviburla
in reply to: Anonymous

raviburla
Autodesk
Autodesk

 

Hi,

 

The error message indicates that there is some issue in the geometric pre-processing. This step happens before contact detection. The problem could be dataset specific. If you can send the model, we can take a look.  

 

Please also see the discussion here:  http://forums.autodesk.com/t5/Inventor-General-Discussion/Meshing-error/m-p/5188005#M517097

 

Thanks,

Ravi Burla (Autodesk)



Ravi Burla
Sr. Principal Research Engineer
0 Likes

 

Hi,

 

The error message indicates that there is some issue in the geometric pre-processing. This step happens before contact detection. The problem could be dataset specific. If you can send the model, we can take a look.  

 

Please also see the discussion here:  http://forums.autodesk.com/t5/Inventor-General-Discussion/Meshing-error/m-p/5188005#M517097

 

Thanks,

Ravi Burla (Autodesk)



Ravi Burla
Sr. Principal Research Engineer
Message 5 of 7
Anonymous
in reply to: raviburla

Anonymous
Not applicable

Just a point to this, I was getting the same error, even though I had excluded 90% of the assembly parts to drill down to only the important parts.  When I performed a pack & go (still got the error on the pack & go assembly initially) I then physically deleted the parts that I had excluded previously and the simulation ran fine.  This suggests that simply excluding a part from the simulation isn't as complete as it apears.

0 Likes

Just a point to this, I was getting the same error, even though I had excluded 90% of the assembly parts to drill down to only the important parts.  When I performed a pack & go (still got the error on the pack & go assembly initially) I then physically deleted the parts that I had excluded previously and the simulation ran fine.  This suggests that simply excluding a part from the simulation isn't as complete as it apears.

Message 6 of 7
hej.simon
in reply to: Anonymous

hej.simon
Explorer
Explorer

I can confirm this. I had a sheet metal weldment where I got "Regularization Failed" when building the mesh. I tried to change the mesh settings but could not make it work. It was only when i completely deleted some already excluded bearings that the error was gone. Its obvious that excluded components still are playing around with the meshing.

 

I'm running Inventor 2020.

 

0 Likes

I can confirm this. I had a sheet metal weldment where I got "Regularization Failed" when building the mesh. I tried to change the mesh settings but could not make it work. It was only when i completely deleted some already excluded bearings that the error was gone. Its obvious that excluded components still are playing around with the meshing.

 

I'm running Inventor 2020.

 

Message 7 of 7
jalger
in reply to: hej.simon

jalger
Collaborator
Collaborator

Well no need to delete them, you just need to change your workflow. 

Make a Level of Detail and make sure that is active, before you start the solver.

Parts that are already suppressed in the assembly will not show up in the Solver ( built-in and Nastran).

It will bring in only unsuppressed parts, then you can generate the mesh. ( along with the rest of the setup- but the mesh was the issue here)

 

This way you don't need to delete parts from the assembly to run the solver.

That said its always a good idea to have a Solve copy (FEA Copy) vs a working copy (Design / Production Copy), mostly for vault as those solves can get rather large. Trust me you don't need or want the 200Mb files attached in vault. 

James Alger
(I'm on several hundred posts as "algerj")

Work:
Dell Precision 5530 (Xeon E 2176M)
1tb SSD, 64GB RAM
Nvidia Quadro P2000, Win10

Well no need to delete them, you just need to change your workflow. 

Make a Level of Detail and make sure that is active, before you start the solver.

Parts that are already suppressed in the assembly will not show up in the Solver ( built-in and Nastran).

It will bring in only unsuppressed parts, then you can generate the mesh. ( along with the rest of the setup- but the mesh was the issue here)

 

This way you don't need to delete parts from the assembly to run the solver.

That said its always a good idea to have a Solve copy (FEA Copy) vs a working copy (Design / Production Copy), mostly for vault as those solves can get rather large. Trust me you don't need or want the 200Mb files attached in vault. 

James Alger
(I'm on several hundred posts as "algerj")

Work:
Dell Precision 5530 (Xeon E 2176M)
1tb SSD, 64GB RAM
Nvidia Quadro P2000, Win10

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report