Dimensional errors in 2025.1

Dimensional errors in 2025.1

steve_lindley
Advocate Advocate
1,073 Views
7 Replies
Message 1 of 8

Dimensional errors in 2025.1

steve_lindley
Advocate
Advocate

Hi,

 

I wonder if anyone else has experienced this...

 

Myself and a colleague have both independently experienced incorrect display of dimensions - a fundamental error for Inventor! Of course, we're both experienced designers and have checked our work and asked for second opinions, but can't explain this any other way.

 

We're both using Inventor Professional 2025.1.1 Build: 241

 

Please see screenshots of an instance I've seen this morning. I couldn't understand why two components didn't line up. I used a reference dimension in one component to size the second. To understand why they didn't line up, I turned on visibility of the sketches in the parts. You can clearly see both 630mm dimensions.

 

In the component part with the reference dimension, if I try to place a second dimension, the preview is 668mm, so it's clear this is the incorrect instance.

 

I'm curious to see what Autodesk make of this.

0 Likes
1,074 Views
7 Replies
Replies (7)
Message 2 of 8

kacper.suchomski
Mentor
Mentor

Hi

There is a high probability that you are using adaptivity. If I am right, one dimension describes the value before the update, the other - after. In such situations, you need to take care of updating the model.

cc @Frederick_Law 


Kacper Suchomski

EESignature


YouTube - Inventor tutorials | LinkedIn | Instagram

Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.


0 Likes
Message 3 of 8

steve_lindley
Advocate
Advocate

@kacper.suchomski Thanks for the suggestion and for taking the time to reply, but I can guarantee we're not using adaptivity. Personally speaking, I prefer not to use that functionality at all.

0 Likes
Message 4 of 8

Frederick_Law
Mentor
Mentor

Probably model failed to update.

Reboot computer.  Sometime IV crashed but keep running in background.

Could be file corruption.

Put the parts in another assembly and see if it works.

Any iLogic?

I'm using 2023 so can't open your files but attach them so other can check.

0 Likes
Message 5 of 8

johnsonshiue
Community Manager
Community Manager

Hi! I have seen this behavior before. It is probably a corrupted driven dimension. Or somehow there is an implicit cyclic relationship between the parameters. Please share the file here. I would like to understand the behavior better.

Many thanks!

 



Johnson Shiue (johnson.shiue@autodesk.com)
Software Test Engineer
0 Likes
Message 6 of 8

steve_lindley
Advocate
Advocate

@johnsonshiue Please see files attached. 

 

I basically couldn't wait, so I deleted the original dimension and placed a new one and it has been fine since.

0 Likes
Message 7 of 8

steve_lindley
Advocate
Advocate

To all that have taken an interest in this, I still believe there is something not quite right in this version of Inventor. I have a slightly different example. Not dimensions in a sketch, but something I've not seen before in 13 years of using Inventor either. It was a simple measuring task. The first time I measured between two items in an assembly, I noticed it wasn't a round number as I was expecting, (502.49994mm) so I spent a couple of minutes checking my parts and constraints to see where the problem lay. I couldn't find an issue, so I went back to measure again and this time got 502.50000mm as it should have been. [I like to see more decimal places than is strictly necessary - just a personal preference].

 

Not trusting what I'd seen I measured again and got the 502.49994mm again. The thing I didn't immediately notice was that Inventor is measuring a height difference between parallel planes for some unknown reason. Since when has it done that? I asked a colleague to come look and he was as puzzled as me.

 

Why is it doing that?

0 Likes
Message 8 of 8

steve_lindley
Advocate
Advocate

I'd like to add to my last message as I believe there is a very slight angular misalignment because I've got mismatches all over the place. So, I'm going to eat my words and apologise. The original post still stands, but this measurement issue is human error I think.

0 Likes