Community
Inventor Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Inventor Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Inventor topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Dimension Alignment

10 REPLIES 10
Reply
Message 1 of 11
Anonymous
849 Views, 10 Replies

Dimension Alignment

Please see the attached drawing of my model. Is there a way I can get that dimension to be aligned with the frame member. I'm trying to show the overall length of that piece and then put another dimension showing how much to cut in. I could place a separate view of that part but I'm trying to avoid that. I have a parts list with the length but it would be nice to have that dimension. I thought maybe I could somehow select that line that I want it to be parallel to and make the dimension align with it. Is this possible?
10 REPLIES 10
Message 2 of 11
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous


Yes, try picking the top edge, or at the least, pick both ends
of the same edge. You picked one on the top edge, the other on thebottom
edge.


--
Dennis Jeffrey, Autodesk Inventor Certified
Expert
Autodesk Manufacturing Implementation Certified
Expert.
Instructor/Author/Sr. App Engr.
AIP 2008 SP2, AIP 2009-SP1
PcCillin AV
HP zv5000  AMD64 2GB - Geforce Go 440, Driver: .8185
XP
Pro SP2, Windows XP Silver Theme

href="http://teknigroup.com">http://teknigroup.com
Message 3 of 11
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous


But wouldn't picking just one edge provide a
slightly too short result if he's after the overal length before the ends are
chamfered?  Wouldn't measuring just one edge result in the length of a beam
terminating with a square-end at the point of contact with the vertical
strut?

 

Have to admit I'm more of a moulded-parts designer
than a frame generator user, so could well be wrong.


style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">


Yes, try picking the top edge, or at the least, pick both
ends of the same edge. You picked one on the top edge, the other on thebottom
edge.


--
Dennis Jeffrey, Autodesk Inventor Certified
Expert
Autodesk Manufacturing Implementation Certified
Expert.
Instructor/Author/Sr. App Engr.
AIP 2008 SP2, AIP 2009-SP1
PcCillin AV
HP zv5000  AMD64 2GB - Geforce Go 440, Driver: .8185
XP
Pro SP2, Windows XP Silver Theme

href="http://teknigroup.com">http://teknigroup.com
Message 4 of 11
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous


It works the same way as in AutoCAD. You do have running
endpoint snap when placing a dimension. I made a general statement. You
can see by his image that he mis-picked somewhere...


--
Dennis Jeffrey, Autodesk Inventor Certified
Expert
Autodesk Manufacturing Implementation Certified
Expert.
Instructor/Author/Sr. App Engr.
AIP 2008 SP2, AIP 2009-SP1
PcCillin AV
HP zv5000  AMD64 2GB - Geforce Go 440, Driver: .8185
XP
Pro SP2, Windows XP Silver Theme

href="http://teknigroup.com">http://teknigroup.com
Message 5 of 11
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous


I know what you were meaning, but think it will
provide the wrong dimension.

 

I think the op is after the tip-to-tip length of
the beam, but measured parallel to it.  If the beam was laid out flat it
would just be a horizontal dim.  I've tried to show in the attached
png. 

 

I think the only way to do this might be to draw a
sketch ontop of the view, dim that and then hide the sketch?.

 

Hope that makes sense.


style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">


It works the same way as in AutoCAD. You do have running
endpoint snap when placing a dimension. I made a general statement. You
can see by his image that he mis-picked somewhere...


--
Dennis Jeffrey, Autodesk Inventor Certified
Expert
Autodesk Manufacturing Implementation Certified
Expert.
Instructor/Author/Sr. App Engr.
AIP 2008 SP2, AIP 2009-SP1
PcCillin AV
HP zv5000  AMD64 2GB - Geforce Go 440, Driver: .8185
XP
Pro SP2, Windows XP Silver Theme

href="http://teknigroup.com">http://teknigroup.com
Message 6 of 11
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous


Sorry, I misstook the extension line on the left for the end
of the part. I was able to properly dimension a similar part using one sketch
line perpendicular to the bottom edge (attached). I realize that this is a
weldment, and lots of people like to detail individual parts within the weldment
(still say it's bad practice especially on large complicated weldments with lots
of parts), but this part should still be an individual detail with a view
properly oriented to an orthogonal plane. If that were done, we wouldn't be
having this discussion. On the rare occasions where this situation needs to be
documented within an assembly view, a simple sketch will be needed in order to
place this dimension.

 

BTW, mine was done in IV 2009.


--
Dennis Jeffrey, Autodesk Inventor Certified
Expert
Autodesk Manufacturing Implementation Certified
Expert.
Instructor/Author/Sr. App Engr.
AIP 2008 SP2, AIP 2009-SP1
PcCillin AV
HP zv5000  AMD64 2GB - Geforce Go 440, Driver: .8185
XP
Pro SP2, Windows XP Silver Theme

href="http://teknigroup.com">http://teknigroup.com
Message 7 of 11
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

Thanks Sam and Dennis. I've decided to do separate views of each part. When the part is laid out horizontally or vertically this dimension is correct as Dennis explained. And if I acually did the welds in the program this dimension would interfere with the fillet weld. I agree the individual details are the way to go now. Its funny though because in the view attached where I have the part horizontal, I would think Inventor would want to make the dimension parallel to a line drawn from endpoint to endpoint which it is not in this case but it is what I want so no problem there I just thought I'd mention it.
Still in my original attempt I think the option should be there to make the dimension parallel to a nearbly line. Power dims in autocad mechanical give that placement option. (see attachment) I'm just thinking it might be useful for a future situation.

thanks again..Mike
Message 8 of 11
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

this is the attachment of the power dimension placement options I was talking about.
Message 9 of 11
dan_inv09
in reply to: Anonymous

If you want the dimension to be parallel to the point to point "line" you have to initially place it within a rectangle who's corners are at the points. Sorry it's still to early to describe it better, the dimension will go to horizontal if you drag it below the lower endpoint (or above the higher point) and if you go to the right of the rightmost point (or left of left) it will go vertical. With something long and narrow (or tall and skinny) it's harder to get into the area where it dimensions diagonally.

I agree it would be nice to be able to pick something to align it to.
Message 10 of 11
dan_inv09
in reply to: Anonymous

If you want the dimension to be parallel to the point to point "line" you have to initially place it within a rectangle who's corners are at the points. Sorry it's still to early to describe it better, the dimension will go to horizontal if you drag it below the lower endpoint (or above the higher point) and if you go to the right of the rightmost point (or left of left) it will go vertical. With something long and narrow (or tall and skinny) it's harder to get into the area where it dimensions diagonally.

I agree it would be nice to be able to pick something to align it to.
Message 11 of 11
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

I see what you're saying. If drag the dimension inside the part it changes to be diagonal. So in my original post I was looking for the opposite of this. I thought if I dragged the dimension close to my part it would align with it like in the autocad screen shot I posted earlier. Thanks dan.

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report