Hmm...I mentioned AutoCAD in my post as that is what the Autodesk example uses; however the real issue is Revit. With Revit, everyone involved in a project must be using the same version of the software - the architect, the structural engineer and the mechanical engineer. When the architect, our client, says we need to use Revit 2019 then that is what we must use. We have projects starting today that require Revit 2019 and those projects can last up to three years. So it is important to the firm that we understand exactly what versions of the software we can use and under what circumstances.
By the way, I would say it is a rare circumstance that the user of the software is the one paying for the subscription. The employee is hired, put at a given workstation, and the employer pays Autodesk. IT updates workstations on continuing basis without regard to the particulars of Autodesk's EULA. New machines are bought and old ones retired.
I have seen that link before about auto-activation but I also notice the phrase "perpetual licenses activation" which is not the situation here. The posting seems to imply that software already activated on a given device can continue to be used but that you can't get it to work on a new device. On the other hand, I have seen a different posting stating that the end of auto-activation also applies to subscription. This just leaves me confused.
Adding to the confusion, Simon's posting stated that activation was a thing of the past. So how can you use 2010 software without activation per the example that I pointed to in my first post? This an official policy posting with an effective date of May 2023; a date which appears right at the top of the page.
So to recap:
- The official posting clearly states 2010 software can continue to be used.
- Other Autodesk announcements state that 2010 software can not be reactivated (new activation)
- I am trying to reconcile these and other official postings into a coherent understanding of the licensing situation.
Michelle