Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Show only
|
Search instead for
Did you mean:
This page has been translated for your convenience with an automatic translation service. This is not an official translation and may contain errors and inaccurate translations. Autodesk does not warrant, either expressly or implied, the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information translated by the machine translation service and will not be liable for damages or losses caused by the trust placed in the translation service.Translate
This is something we hear quite frequently from many customers, and we know we have a lot of work to do in this area. I'm going to leave this as "Gathering Support" so that people know to vote on it and also look around to see if I can consolidate similar ideas already posted into one.
Hello from Mother Russia guys.This post has been almost 3 years old, and you still haven’t done the normal support of the component railways.For me, of course, this is a big mystery, why?Why, for roads, here you have profiles and curves with transitions.And the option that everyone offers to take the usual road and turn it into a railway in styles is complete nonsense.All the examples that were shown are a couple of paths in the field following in parallel in a straight line.And enter a curve with these “styles” or pair these paths with the railroad switch, what will happen is that you will get a usual road intersection on the railway.Why do not such examples show in your webinars?In general, I think you understand that to my indignation (and I think of many designers) there is no limit why such a huge layer of design has been forgotten by your program?Please answer, well, when will you add normal rail support?
Thinking to recent Civil 3D improvement about Rails, I think time arrived for InfraWorks component Rail object! Rail design is a big market, and is growing a lot. We ask for rails! Thanks
