Hi everyone.
I've been trying to import a 3D Model of a Bridge into Infraworks and I'm getting different results depending on which Infraworks model I import the bridge into:
I would like to know why only in the 2nd case the IFC file is displayed correctly, while in the other cases it is either displayed as a rectangle or not displayed at all. I'm using the same IFC file in all 3 cases and the same coordinate system (UTM84 - Zone 32 N). I've attached a rar file with the three images and the IFC file.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi everyone.
I've been trying to import a 3D Model of a Bridge into Infraworks and I'm getting different results depending on which Infraworks model I import the bridge into:
I would like to know why only in the 2nd case the IFC file is displayed correctly, while in the other cases it is either displayed as a rectangle or not displayed at all. I'm using the same IFC file in all 3 cases and the same coordinate system (UTM84 - Zone 32 N). I've attached a rar file with the three images and the IFC file.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Solved by Karsten.Saenger. Go to Solution.
Hi @IIbanez_Student ,
in your screenshot "image 1" you show the "dummy terrain" that is created for any object if not terrain exists in the model. The geometry of the bridge is probably much higher.
The bigger problem is that there is geometry corruption of your bridge model caused by the use of large coordinates.
This behavior is expected, see https://knowledge.autodesk.com/article/InfraWorks-Import-of-IFC-file-does-not-work-or-the-model-geom...
I'm surprised that the IFC model is displayed correctly in your use case 2.
For your 3rd use case, you say that you imported the IFC model into a model that is 20km off. When you create a new model, the model properties are set to show the full extent. This is the size of your model.
If you load an object that is outside your model size bounding box, it's not displayed.
IFC model loaded with large coordinates:
I noticed something wrong in general if the IFC file is imported with coordinates using the IFCINFRAEXPORT (IFC 4x3) from Civil 3D. The geometry is placed at the wrong location in InfraWorks.
If you import the DWG directly, the geometry is placed correctly.
I will forward this issue to the development team for further investigation.
Imported as 3D Model DWG:
Regards,
Karsten.
Hi @IIbanez_Student ,
in your screenshot "image 1" you show the "dummy terrain" that is created for any object if not terrain exists in the model. The geometry of the bridge is probably much higher.
The bigger problem is that there is geometry corruption of your bridge model caused by the use of large coordinates.
This behavior is expected, see https://knowledge.autodesk.com/article/InfraWorks-Import-of-IFC-file-does-not-work-or-the-model-geom...
I'm surprised that the IFC model is displayed correctly in your use case 2.
For your 3rd use case, you say that you imported the IFC model into a model that is 20km off. When you create a new model, the model properties are set to show the full extent. This is the size of your model.
If you load an object that is outside your model size bounding box, it's not displayed.
IFC model loaded with large coordinates:
I noticed something wrong in general if the IFC file is imported with coordinates using the IFCINFRAEXPORT (IFC 4x3) from Civil 3D. The geometry is placed at the wrong location in InfraWorks.
If you import the DWG directly, the geometry is placed correctly.
I will forward this issue to the development team for further investigation.
Imported as 3D Model DWG:
Regards,
Karsten.
Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.