Mazak Integrex Postprocessor Needed

[Anonymous]

The Integrex Post that is available here is a "Mill-Turn" Post. Does anyone here have a "Turn-Mill" Post we could purchase? Any help here would be greatly appreciated and like I said, we would pay for any assistance in obtaining one. Not sure if the control is required but it is a Matrix control. It would be great to find one that has already been proven, or at least most of it has.

Thanks!

Brett......

[Laurens-3DTechDraw]

Mill-turn of Turn-MIll is the same in post processors for HSM.

[al.whatmough]

We have a base post that was created for Integrex machines generally needs customization for the specific machine.

This post generally needs customization for the specific machine.

There a few partners that are very good that dealing with the post.

@ArjanDijk  Is one of the guys that come to mind as being good with this machine.

Here is the base post:

https://cam.autodesk.com/hsmposts?p=mazak_integrex

Again, this is a post where you want to work with a post-Author to refine for your specific machine.

With that said,  it isn't something that should worry you.  This post has been refined and is running multiple Integrex machines.

[Anonymous]

CNC Machineworks is now Cadac Group Digital Fabrication and yes we have succesfully integrated the Mazak Integrex post at several customers.

Actually we spent a couple of days at Mazak Europe with very good help from them to succesfully make and test the post.

Please let us know if we can be at any help.

Roel Raeven

[Anonymous]

I think we've tried this post on our 400-IV Integrex with Matrix Control and we get a alarm #401 "Illegal  Format". When we bybass the milling part, it works okay. We have Mazak stumped.

Thanks,

Brett.....

[Anonymous]

My first guess is that is has nothing to do with the post, but more machine settings related. Mazak requires certain settings on the controller, so the generated nc-code will work correct.  

Best approach is to ask Mazak for the correct settings, if they are not at any help, let me know.

/Roel

[Anonymous]

Yes, we already have. That's why I said Mazak was stumped. Unfortunately, we purchased this machine used, so not sure what has been messed with. Thanks everyone in advance for your help. This has really caused some negativity with HSM even tho its not the software at all. We just got to find a solution and everyone here will be okay.

Thanks!

Brett........

[Laurens-3DTechDraw]

Is there an exact line it errors out on?

That would help a lot.

I believe such an error could be for example a dot in an spindle speed where the machine doesn't allow for that.

So it could be really simple/small 

[Anonymous]

Yes, it was line 13. I put the whole line in parenthesis and it still error d out. It was a Macro line. I will get a printout when I get to work and post it here later.

[Anonymous]

This program would run if we inserted a "GOTO" statement bypassing the turn processes and went to milling. the beginning code is below and it was an "Illegal Format", stopping on line 13.

Thanks!

Brett.......

O10106 ( 0010106-XXX XXXXX )
( MAZAK INTEGREX-IVS )
( C:\PROJECTS\0010106-xxx xxxxx\1111111-XXX XXXXX.ESP )
(8/27/2017 12:06:05 PM)

(******************** TOOL LIST ********************)
(T001.01 | 80° OD FLASH TOOL)
(T019 | .5 C.E.M. W/A .12 RAD.)
(T022 | .5 C.E.M. W/A .03" RAD)
(T023 | .375 C.E.M. W/A .03 RAD)
(T037 | 6.5MM GUHRING DRILL .256")
(T038 | 11.51MM GUHRING DRILL .453")
(***************************************************)

G0 G18 G20 G40 G80 G97 G99
G53.5

#500=0 (ENTER B DISTANCE FROM HD2 COLLET/JAWS TO Z ZERO ON HD1 AS ABSOLUTE VALUE)
#501=[ABS[#500]+#9101+1.772] ( USED FOR G53.5 VALUE ON SUB SPINDLE OPERATIONS )
#502=0 (PHASE ADJUSTMENT FOR HD2 CAXIS IN PICKUP)

N1 (FACE PART)
G123.1
M901
M202
T001.01 T019 M6 (80° OD FLASH TOOL)
(PUBLISHER:KENNAMETAL)
(COMPONENTS:KM63XMZMCMNNF12115Y, CNMG120408P)
G97 S753 M4 R1
M248
M250
G0 B45.
M251
G53.5
M153
G0 Z.02 Y0
X2.677
G50 S1500 R1
G96 S500 M4 R1
G99 G18
G72 W.02 R.02
G72 P0002 Q0003 U0 W0 F.05
N2 G0 Z0
N3 G1 G99 X-.063
G97
M154 M9
G0 G28 U0 V0
G28 W0
M250
G28 B0
M5
M1

[Anonymous]

I believe we have a parallel track here, our post developer has been working on this for the past week or two. It is a tricky problem, but we are close now. I will ask him to update customer

[ArjanDijk]

@al.whatmough, thanks for mentioning my name

Hi @Anonymous.

I tested this post at several customers, but it is build for the smooth control which differs from Matrix control, that was already said by the Mazak engineers. It needs some work.

[Anonymous]

Hi @al.whatmough,

Can you help in this case, I get this page when i pick on you link.

https://www.screencast.com/t/F2Jxfe3mu

Thank you,

Jacob

[Laurens-3DTechDraw]

Try this link: https://cam.autodesk.com/posts/?p=mazak_integrex

[alouramore]

Hello,

I am really in need of some help.  We purchased a used Integrex 200 3st with Fusion 640 control and I'd like to hire someone to help us with getting a post worked out.  Is this something you do?  We can give you any feedback you need in order to tune it up.   Unfortunately this is an urgent need as I am trying to have this machine setup for another company in a week.  Please let me know if you are willing and able to work on this.

Thank you

Adam 

[Anonymous]

Hi Adam,

Where are you located? We can provide you with help, but not on such a short notice.

Regards,

/Roel

[alouramore]

Florida USA

If possible could we talk via whatsapp?  5615420514/usa I think +1 for country code at beginning.  I'd like to just discuss compensation via phone and then we can see about moving on  🙂

[Anonymous]

Also have a Mazak Integrex 200s iv. trying to make post work and it just isn't happy.

[alouramore]

Might have one you can try. Send me an email alouramore at g mail dot com.

[Anonymous]

Do you guys have a post that will work with a Mazak IVS-300 Nexus 2 Control?