Anyone have Post for Leadwell V40iT w/ Fanuc Oi-MD Control?

Anyone have Post for Leadwell V40iT w/ Fanuc Oi-MD Control?

ARTHUR-HM
Collaborator Collaborator
2,414 Views
11 Replies
Message 1 of 12

Anyone have Post for Leadwell V40iT w/ Fanuc Oi-MD Control?

ARTHUR-HM
Collaborator
Collaborator

Just purchased Fusion 360 Ultimate and I'm trying to get some of those new multi-axis operations that come with it to work with our two v40iT's. 

0 Likes
2,415 Views
11 Replies
Replies (11)
Message 2 of 12

Laurens-3DTechDraw
Mentor
Mentor

The Generic Fanuc should run just fine on those.

You would have to tell the post the kinematics of the machine, though.

Find info on how to do that here: http://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-post-processor-forum/how-to-set-up-a-4-5-axis-machine-configuratio...

 

By default these post are set-up to use fanuc's multi-axis features like G68.2 if your machine don't have these features we will have to change a setting in the post.

Laurens Wijnschenk
3DTechDraw

AutoDesk CAM user & Post editor.
Found out the hard way is the best way to win.


Message 3 of 12

ARTHUR-HM
Collaborator
Collaborator

Thanks for the info, I'm going to try this out after break and see if I can't get it to work. First I need to find out if our machine supports G68.2

 

 

0 Likes
Message 4 of 12

ARTHUR-HM
Collaborator
Collaborator

I'm getting this error message when trying to use the new swarf toolpath with the generic fanuc post. I've set the A & C axis from false to true in the post. This is what I get.

 

Error: Failed to invoke function 'onRewindMachine'.

 

I assume I need to tweak something else in the post as well?

0 Likes
Message 5 of 12

Laurens-3DTechDraw
Mentor
Mentor

@ARTHUR-HM wrote:

Thanks for the info, I'm going to try this out after break and see if I can't get it to work. First I need to find out if our machine supports G68.2

 

 


Yes, that's probably the first thing to to.

Look for the options TCP and Tilted Working Plane.

TCP is 5-axis simultaneous, Tilted Working Plane is 3+2.

Laurens Wijnschenk
3DTechDraw

AutoDesk CAM user & Post editor.
Found out the hard way is the best way to win.


0 Likes
Message 6 of 12

ARTHUR-HM
Collaborator
Collaborator

I only see tilted work plane in the documentation. So I assume that means no swarf then?

0 Likes
Message 7 of 12

ARTHUR-HM
Collaborator
Collaborator

Had some free time today, so I decided to see if I can't get this working. I ran a simple operation.

 

Here is the setup:

setup.png

 

 

 

Here is the operation:

operation.png

 

 

It's a 2" Cube. I set G54 to the back center of part, Z0 on top of PC as shown in first image. I then created an operation to mill the 45° chamfer. I used tool orientation to setup rotation.

 

When I first ran it, the table did not tilt. I added P1 after the G68.2 and that fixed that issue.

But, something is definitely still off. The tool started way out in front and way off to the left of the part. It should have started to the right of the part as shown in image two. 

 

Any thoughts on this? 

0 Likes
Message 8 of 12

Laurens-3DTechDraw
Mentor
Mentor

@ARTHUR-HM wrote:

I only see tilted work plane in the documentation. So I assume that means no swarf then?


Well I think the 0i-MD doesn't do 5-axis simultaneous if I do some googling. 

But the 3+2 with tilted work plane is a plus. I'm pretty sure this means we can actually place your workoffset anywhere you want and use the G68.2 code.

So if you set up the correct machine configuration you should be able to try out the the code on your machine.

Laurens Wijnschenk
3DTechDraw

AutoDesk CAM user & Post editor.
Found out the hard way is the best way to win.


0 Likes
Message 9 of 12

Laurens-3DTechDraw
Mentor
Mentor

@ARTHUR-HM wrote:

Had some free time today, so I decided to see if I can't get this working. I ran a simple operation.

 

Here is the setup:

 

 

 

 

Here is the operation:

 

 

 

It's a 2" Cube. I set G54 to the back center of part, Z0 on top of PC as shown in first image. I then created an operation to mill the 45° chamfer. I used tool orientation to setup rotation.

 

When I first ran it, the table did not tilt. I added P1 after the G68.2 and that fixed that issue.

But, something is definitely still off. The tool started way out in front and way off to the left of the part. It should have started to the right of the part as shown in image two. 

 

Any thoughts on this? 


Do you have a good relationship with the dealer?

Laurens Wijnschenk
3DTechDraw

AutoDesk CAM user & Post editor.
Found out the hard way is the best way to win.


0 Likes
Message 10 of 12

ARTHUR-HM
Collaborator
Collaborator

I believe so, We've purchased four of these from them in the last 3 or so years. I never deal with them myself though.

0 Likes
Message 11 of 12

Laurens-3DTechDraw
Mentor
Mentor

Might be good to ask them about this.

Since I'm pretty sure the code is correct, but I'm not sure if they set-up the machine correctly for it.

They can probably also tell us what is wrong when the code does turn out to be wrong.

Laurens Wijnschenk
3DTechDraw

AutoDesk CAM user & Post editor.
Found out the hard way is the best way to win.


Message 12 of 12

fernvillecorp
Community Visitor
Community Visitor
Hi Arthur. How did you go with the post processor for your Leadwell V40iT w/fanuc OI-MD control? I have the same machine and the same issues. Please send me email at [email protected] with what you came up with. Much appreciated.
0 Likes