Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Show only
|
Search instead for
Did you mean:
This page has been translated for your convenience with an automatic translation service. This is not an official translation and may contain errors and inaccurate translations. Autodesk does not warrant, either expressly or implied, the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information translated by the machine translation service and will not be liable for damages or losses caused by the trust placed in the translation service.Translate
I would love to see a 3 axis chamfer feature with a ball nose, sort of a morph tool-path but simple selection of the chamfer surface or edges. Would make life so much easier. I know I can run a few 3D strategies to get the job done, but when you have many such chamfers to do would be great to have a simple solution for complex parts.
@SouthernCrossSmallArms I'm pretty sure it could be next week or 5 months. The last 5% is the hardest so it could all be going good or the guys find a problem and it takes a while. So no due date.
Can you tell us a little about how Blend works versus Flow?
I'm a pretty heavy user of Flow, so I am super interested in learning more. The lack of Flow (and frustrations with how sketching works) are my two big gripes about Fusion.
@Laurens-3DTechDraw that is exactly the way surfcam does their multi-cut toolpath, pic a string of faces and then morph between 2 curves to contain, uses incremental or scallop stepover and check surfaces also. I have to use both HSMWorks and surfcam to get the parts done because the lack of control of Flow in Woks.
@Anonymous I'm with a brother! Use flow cutting a **** load! On almost every part for something or another.
lets get it rolling guys, half baked is better than nothing, let us help by grinding away on the code, please.
@Laurens-3DTechDraw I have been eagerly awaiting this sort of functionality. Flow works... tolerably... in most instances but then you get funny failures at times that don't make much sense.
I'm with @lenny_1962 and would love for this to be put out in beta functionality in all the packages. Much more useful for a much broader range of users than full 5-axis toolpaths IMO.
That's kind of what I said earlier already right that it's being tested in an alpha test.
That includes users.
And it's still especially bad on badly modeled parts.
And I relly think this is a major step forward when some serious issue's in there are resolved before making it in a beta release for everyone to test.
@Laurens-3DTechDraw so get the 3 of us on alpha, we use that strategy alot and we all use it differently the same way kind of sorta you betcha der hey!!!
Batch processing ideas that are 10+ months old with less than 5 votes.
This is in no way to suggest the idea isn't a good one. However, the lack of votes tends to mean that the community feels other ideas should be given a higher priority.
Feel free to tag me if you feel an idea wasn't given enough of a chance. We are more than happy to have a conversation on any of these ideas.
