Community
Fusion Manufacture
Talk shop with the Fusion (formerly Fusion 360) Manufacture Community. Share tool strategies, tips, get advice and solve problems together with the best minds in the industry.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Thread Milling Rapid Collision with stock error

23 REPLIES 23
SOLVED
Reply
Message 1 of 24
winteragera
1255 Views, 23 Replies

Thread Milling Rapid Collision with stock error

Hi all, before I continue, I just want to say I am very new to CNC and Fusion360 CAM

 

My goal is to make a "water distribution plate" that accepts G1/4 BSP threading with M4 screws holding two-piece of cast acrylic sheet together.

 

I am trying to thread mill some M4 screw holes into 12.7mm cast acrylic sheet. However, I'm running into one major problem at the moment. When I try to simulate the threading process, I keep getting these red bads and it indicates "Rapid collision with stock" 

Some of the things I've tried:

-Checking my tool size is correct

-Setting the top height to "Stock top: 0mm" in the height tab

-Making sure the design hole depth is NOT longer than flute length of the thread mill cutter

winteragera_0-1585676279476.pngwinteragera_1-1585676543577.png

winteragera_4-1585676982817.png

 

 

 

 

I am using a thread mill cutter from Datron and they haven't provided me the tool measurement so I gave it a shot myself. Please check if anything is wrong.

 

winteragera_2-1585676620689.pngwinteragera_3-1585676658605.png

 

 

23 REPLIES 23
Message 2 of 24
seth.madore
in reply to: winteragera

At this point in time, selecting a single operation and Simulating it will not give you the result of everything that theoretically should have occurred before. To avoid getting false alarms, simulate everything you got


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing
Message 3 of 24
Anonymous
in reply to: seth.madore

Something to check would be your lead in (lead out) values on your linking page.

That's the last tab on the right in threading. Lets say your major diameter M4 thread is

.158 t0 .161 . This means your minor is, lets say .136 diameter. If your tool is 3mm (.1181)

your lead in/out has to be small enough to allow clearance. Hope this helps!   

Message 4 of 24
winteragera
in reply to: seth.madore

When I try to simulate everything, it still gives me the error 😞

winteragera_0-1585685040640.png

 

Message 5 of 24

Hi @winteragera,

 

Could you attach your Fusion project please

 

 

File> Export > export as .f3d



Richard Stubley
Product Manager - Fusion Mechanical Design
Message 6 of 24
winteragera
in reply to: Anonymous

I just tried your method. Unfortunately, changing the horizontal and vertical lead in/out in the linking tabdoesn't help. There's still the error or "Rapid Collision with stock"

winteragera_1-1585685516244.png

 

Message 7 of 24

Yep, hope this gets solve soon. 

 

 

Message 8 of 24
seth.madore
in reply to: winteragera

You did not have any drilling cycle before the threadmilling. As such, it considered that the holes were still solid. Adding a drill cycle and then simulating both toolpaths yields no collisions:

2020-03-31_16h37_53.png


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing
Message 9 of 24
winteragera
in reply to: seth.madore

Keep in mind I have a thread mill cutter. So it plunges into the materials and does the threadings at the same time. 

 

EDIT:

With the drill (full retract) operations before the thread operation, it still gives me an error. Even with simulating everything and not simulating the threading itself 

winteragera_0-1585688311305.png

 

EDIT 2: My issue now is the deep drilling operation doesn't cover the whole diameter of the hole. How do I fix that? 

winteragera_0-1585688910427.png

 

 

Message 10 of 24
seth.madore
in reply to: winteragera

Okay then. The threading toolpath isn't going to be your "one and done" solution, as there is nothing baked into these toolpaths to generate both a drill cycle AND a threading cycle. You will need to program one hole with a Drill followed by a Threading cycle and then put that into a Pattern.

 

As for the alarm, I'm not seeing that on my end....


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing
Message 11 of 24
DarthBane55
in reply to: winteragera

The tool does not need a hole, but I doubt that Fusion can handle that type of threadmill directly.  I think you will always get the collision, because the threadmills inside Fusion are not made to cut from the bottom (I think).  You also cannot plunge with the tool, you need to helix with the proper pitch and diameter.   You might actually have to use the "bore" cycle and adjust the pitch.  Maybe the threadmill operation would work, but you need to start from the very top.

Video showing similar tool in action: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=4&v=iUl42whFisI&feature=emb_logo

For your drill question, it seems to me that you got the wrong drill is all...  but you don't need a drill for this tool.

Message 12 of 24
kamil.malec94
in reply to: winteragera

If you add drilling cycle before your Threading cycle and simulate both, you do not get any errors. I always do "Lead to Center" in the Linking Tab, this way I know I will not hit the stock.  

Message 13 of 24
rhdfmail
in reply to: DarthBane55

Threadmilling (2D-thread) works fine from bottom to top. You just select climb-milling 

With combined drills/threadmills it might be possible to trick the operation to drill and then mill
setting the heights so it starts lead in from top, lead feed = feed for drilling, lead to/from center
To make it feed from top, set the safe distance under linking to the same value as your thread/hole depth


Not tested more than a quick test in fusion looking at the toolpaths that is generated

Message 14 of 24
seth.madore
in reply to: winteragera

One question to @winteragera is the tool intended to:

A) Drill the hole and then thread mill it

B) Conventional mill into the part, creating the hole and the thread in the same motion


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing
Message 15 of 24
DarthBane55
in reply to: rhdfmail


@rhdfmail wrote:

Threadmilling (2D-thread) works fine from bottom to top. You just select climb-milling 

With combined drills/threadmills it might be possible to trick the operation to drill and then mill
setting the heights so it starts lead in from top, lead feed = feed for drilling, lead to/from center
To make it feed from top, set the safe distance under linking to the same value as your thread/hole depth


Not tested more than a quick test in fusion looking at the toolpaths that is generated


He needs to start from the top, if you saw the tool, it mills the hole, no drill required.  But your comment about the climb milling starting from bottom, which was my concern for his tool,  and why I suggested to use "bore" operation, I think that choosing conventional mill will force it to start from the top, which is what OP needs to do with this particular tool.  I wasn't sure we could force it to start from the top, but your comment made me realize that the conventional mill will do this.

Message 16 of 24
seth.madore
in reply to: DarthBane55

Yep!


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing
Message 17 of 24
winteragera
in reply to: DarthBane55

This might be a possible solution. I now need to wait for Datron to reply with how I should input this Thread mill cutter bit information into Fusion first. Apparently Fusion doesn't like the tool to be classified as "Thread Mill"

They also haven't updated their tool library. 

 
 
 
 

Threadmill.PNGError Tool Conventional.PNGDatron Information about tool.PNG

 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

Message 18 of 24
seth.madore
in reply to: winteragera

As I mentioned above, does the tool require that you first have a bore operation and then a thread operation, or does it do it all in one shot?


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing
Message 19 of 24
winteragera
in reply to: seth.madore

So it seems like there is no way to get around this. I got replied back from Datron after 2 days (that's why I haven't updated this topic) and they have the exact same problem. The tool itself plunges into the material and does the threading AT THE SAME TIME.

 

Keep in mind they used the thread operation and they still got the "Rapid Collision with Stock" error message. 

winteragera_0-1585940516482.png

 

 

Message 20 of 24
DarthBane55
in reply to: winteragera

It doesn't plunge, it helixes down.  I would just create an endmill with appropriate diameter, and understand the that actual thread would not be shown in the simulation.  Then you won't have the collision alarm.  In this case tho, you do need to use "bore" cycle and adjust the pitch correctly, and make sure the helix is going down in the right direction.  Or the other way, is to use a threadmill tool and operation, but ignore the collision (probably better with this).

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report