Talk shop with the Fusion (formerly Fusion 360) Manufacture Community. Share tool strategies, tips, get advice and solve problems together with the best minds in the industry.
Talk shop with the Fusion (formerly Fusion 360) Manufacture Community. Share tool strategies, tips, get advice and solve problems together with the best minds in the industry.
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Show only
|
Search instead for
Did you mean:
This page has been translated for your convenience with an automatic translation service. This is not an official translation and may contain errors and inaccurate translations. Autodesk does not warrant, either expressly or implied, the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information translated by the machine translation service and will not be liable for damages or losses caused by the trust placed in the translation service.Translate
I looked at it, the beginning is pretty bad where it retracts a lot for no reason. Maybe lowering the top height by just a tiny bit could help, not sure. After that about on mid-height there are some areas where the toolpath is not smooth.
In general it is pretty cool tho! I don't have the extensions enabled at the moment so I can't do anything with the path, but when I get some time I will try them out just for this toolpath. I feel it is probably possible to do some engine ports now, maybe... it looks like it might work... It is definitely a step in the right direction! 🙂
Just to clarify, I am not the same person as the OP, I was just adding a useless comment. I will step out now, but I just want to clarify that OP issue is not dealt with yet 🙄
It is definitely possible to do some engine ports. I have already done this a few times. Best to use tool collision avoidance from point in my experience so far.
Got amazing paths the first time I tried it. But now it's getting a little clumsy. can take a picture possibly of how it will be after machining next week.
Ya I guess it depends on the ports... I am talking ports that have undercut due to the elbow turn, that was not possible before this new functionality, not in 1 toolpath. I've done ports too before in Fusion, but required more than 1 toolpath. I should have specified the 1 toolpath thing. 1 continuous smooth toolpath finishing the entire port that has undercuts areas.
