Community
Fusion Manufacture
Talk shop with the Fusion (formerly Fusion 360) Manufacture Community. Share tool strategies, tips, get advice and solve problems together with the best minds in the industry.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Live Machine connection Fails on new Haas Firmware 2.06

17 REPLIES 17
SOLVED
Reply
Message 1 of 18
philLVQ6X
877 Views, 17 Replies

Live Machine connection Fails on new Haas Firmware 2.06

Firmware updated as of Tuesday to 2.06 and machine connector get stuck with finding buffer. Buffer setting as well IP/Port all match machine controller as we Live connection is enabled. Machine can be found via CMD ping. It will display this error and ask to use diffent Macros/buffer locations upon changing issue still populates.


17 REPLIES 17
Message 2 of 18
seth.madore
in reply to: philLVQ6X

I'm checking in with the dev team responsible for this area to see if they have any insight into the issue, I'll let you know when I know more.


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing
Message 3 of 18
seth.madore
in reply to: philLVQ6X

I'm assuming you've downloaded the latest post and machine connector already?


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing
Message 4 of 18
philLVQ6X
in reply to: seth.madore

Yes sir,

FYI Phil B over at JITCADCAM here. Havent seen this problem before.

Message 5 of 18
seth.madore
in reply to: philLVQ6X

Phil? Never heard of him 🤣😁

 

That dev team is UK based, so it might not be until tomorrow when we get an answer


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing
Message 6 of 18
philLVQ6X
in reply to: seth.madore

"Clicks Accept Solution" LOL haha I figured this will be a Richard thing. 

Message 7 of 18
seth.madore
in reply to: philLVQ6X

Is this set to one or two?

2024-04-25_12h48_35.png

 

Set it to two and see if that works, please 


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing
Message 8 of 18
philLVQ6X
in reply to: seth.madore

Ill give it a go. No good information on that field as I tried to set it to 1.1 and it errored me out due to not a whole integer.

Message 9 of 18
philLVQ6X
in reply to: seth.madore

Made the change same issue

philLVQ6X_0-1714064391933.png

 

Message 10 of 18
seth.madore
in reply to: philLVQ6X

I'm assuming you reposted the code and loaded it back on to your machine?


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing
Message 11 of 18
Richard.stubley
in reply to: philLVQ6X

Hey, has this worked on this machine before?

 

Are you pressing cycle start on the machine before Fusion.

 

Can I please see the NC code. 

 

Can you confirm the header is getting written in the first 10 macros from the buffer start address. A pic would be usedull. 

 

 

Also a pic of your machine file with all the connection settings. 

 

 

Sorry for all the questions but saves loads of time.



Richard Stubley
Manager - Manufacturing Specialist Team
Message 12 of 18
philLVQ6X
in reply to: Richard.stubley

philLVQ6X_0-1714065021776.pngphilLVQ6X_1-1714065191647.jpegphilLVQ6X_2-1714065206145.jpeg

 

Message 13 of 18
philLVQ6X
in reply to: Richard.stubley

When both posting and running to hit live connection as well starting live connection prior to running program both fail. We get stuck in a loop on Line 38/39 waiting for Fusion connection.

philLVQ6X_0-1714065503252.jpeg

 

Message 14 of 18
Richard.stubley
in reply to: philLVQ6X

The 2nd Macro Variable in the header 10201 in your case we would expect to be kept at a 4. 

This is Measurement results to store. In your previous image this was 4, but the value of 15 is being written and is also in the NC file. 
So has this been changed as a post property or has the post been changed to write out another value other than whats in that post property.

Please give that a go and let me know. 
Either just quickly change 

#10201 = 15
to
#10201 = 4

Or change the property and re post. 


 





Richard Stubley
Manager - Manufacturing Specialist Team
Message 15 of 18
philLVQ6X
in reply to: Richard.stubley

Do you want the connector version to be 1 or 2?

philLVQ6X_0-1714067172697.png

 

Message 16 of 18
Richard.stubley
in reply to: philLVQ6X

Try 1 first. That should work.



Richard Stubley
Manager - Manufacturing Specialist Team
Message 17 of 18

Please let us know if it works or not we are all waiting in suspense 🙂



Richard Stubley
Manager - Manufacturing Specialist Team
Tags (1)
Message 18 of 18
philLVQ6X
in reply to: Richard.stubley

We are all good now it was a couple of things. 1. Needs to be 2 not 1, The 15 set to 4. and our network switch was giving a bad IP addresss causing connetion issues as well.

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Technology Administrators


Autodesk Design & Make Report