Community
Fusion Manufacture
Talk shop with the Fusion (formerly Fusion 360) Manufacture Community. Share tool strategies, tips, get advice and solve problems together with the best minds in the industry.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Feed optimization slows ALL corners when "only inner" is checked

10 REPLIES 10
Reply
Message 1 of 11
FrodoLoggins
513 Views, 10 Replies

Feed optimization slows ALL corners when "only inner" is checked

For the past few months, selecting "only inner corners" in the "Feed Optimization" section does not apply feed optimization to only the inner corners. It applies it to all corners, for example:

 

Screen Shot 2020-01-08 at 2.04.35 PM.png

 

I've had this issue on 2 rMBPs (2016 15", 2019 16"). Both with latest Fusion version. 2019 16" is on a fresh new install.

 

Let me know if you need anything.

 

Also you guys need to allow longer post titles on the forum lol.

- Time Magazine’s Person of the Year 2006
- Apple M1 Max rMBP A2485 // Latest MacOS // Latest Fusion
- Usually working off files uploaded to Fusion as: Step, STL, SLDPRT. If it matters ask me.
10 REPLIES 10
Message 2 of 11
seth.madore
in reply to: FrodoLoggins

Yep. This issue has existed from the very beginning. The trick is to find the radius value that will hit the internal radii but ignore the external. Sometimes that's not possible....

I'll add this to the ticket Actually, I'm not finding an active ticket on this issue, I will open one and post back here when I have more info!


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing
Message 3 of 11
FrodoLoggins
in reply to: seth.madore

Screen Shot 2020-09-09 at 8.19.00 AM.png

- Time Magazine’s Person of the Year 2006
- Apple M1 Max rMBP A2485 // Latest MacOS // Latest Fusion
- Usually working off files uploaded to Fusion as: Step, STL, SLDPRT. If it matters ask me.
Message 4 of 11
seth.madore
in reply to: FrodoLoggins

Yep, the bug still exists and quite likely will remain "as-is" for some time.

CAM-19631 for reference.


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing
Message 5 of 11
FrodoLoggins
in reply to: seth.madore

Do you know when the feedrate optimization option was first added to Fusion?

- Time Magazine’s Person of the Year 2006
- Apple M1 Max rMBP A2485 // Latest MacOS // Latest Fusion
- Usually working off files uploaded to Fusion as: Step, STL, SLDPRT. If it matters ask me.
Message 6 of 11
seth.madore
in reply to: FrodoLoggins

I think it's been there since day one. AFAIK, all the original toolpaths were ported over from HSMWorks


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing
Message 7 of 11
FrodoLoggins
in reply to: seth.madore

Hi @seth.madore I'm noticing this behavior again and someone liked my OP a few days ago so I'm assuming I'm not the only one.

 

Screenshot 2022-10-19 at 3.11.26 PM.pngScreenshot 2022-10-19 at 3.12.25 PM.png

 

Should we log another ticket or is the original ticket still active?

 

 

- Time Magazine’s Person of the Year 2006
- Apple M1 Max rMBP A2485 // Latest MacOS // Latest Fusion
- Usually working off files uploaded to Fusion as: Step, STL, SLDPRT. If it matters ask me.
Message 8 of 11

Ya would be really great to not have to make separate toolpaths for internal / external if this actually worked as intended

 

Maybe in another 2.5 years. Sometimes I think these tickets are quite literally, never looked at

 

Don't really understand how this would be that hard to address, as in a 2D contour operation the direction is clearly managed by the direction arrow on contour select / the cutter side dropdown box, just flag any radius value as either INT or EXT based on that alone, and apply the FeedOpt feedrate, hell if you just read the upcoming radius value you could automatically feed adjust for ANY corner dia external or internal. That would be incredible

 

Sometimes I think I missed my calling as a software programmer not just a toolpath programmer

Message 9 of 11
seth.madore
in reply to: FrodoLoggins

The feedrate slowdown being applied to outer corners is a bug and it's been documented for some time. Sadly, it doesn't seem to rise to the level of importance we (the users) would prefer to see...


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing
Message 10 of 11
hunt_fred
in reply to: seth.madore

It took me a little while to figure this one out, but it isn't necessarily an actual bug. It functions correctly with one massive caveat. The "Reduced Feed Radius" in the dialog box doesn't refer to the radius of the part, it applies to the radius of the posted code. Therefore if you put in a large radius for that variable, it will include the outside radii as well. For instance if you have a part with uniform .200" inside and outside radii using a 3/8" EM, it will only do the inside radii until the input is greater than .3875". This feature isn't overly smart (aware of the model). It simply slows down all radii below that threshold in the actual code... so even when set correctly a small outside radius might get slowed down and a very large inside radius might not.
Message 11 of 11
engineguy
in reply to: FrodoLoggins

@FrodoLoggins 

@hunt_fred 

@seth.madore 

@dwilliamsFM6K4 

 

Well, decided I had better have a look into the cornering with reduced feeds, it got "interesting" so I did a Screencast because there is too much to type here 🙂 🙂 🙂

Maybe it will be of interest to someone ?? 🙂 🙂

 

First, as there are no internal corners in the OPs file then it isn`t going to do anything that I can see, Radius has a value in it so therefore it will create reduced feed Radii both inner and outer depending on the value, as @dwilliamsFM6K4 suggested it is pretty "dumb" as it is working only from the values input and does not appear to be "model aware", or does it need to be ?? Answers on a Postcard to Autodesk maybe ?? 🙂

 

Screencast link here :-  https://autode.sk/3DjyibC

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report