Announcements

Announcement: We’re aware of an issue affecting starting a new topic from category pages and creating new blog posts. New topics can still be started directly from the relevant board. Learn more here.

3D Adaptive Not Ignoring What It Should, I Think

3D Adaptive Not Ignoring What It Should, I Think

redmond.limited
Enthusiast Enthusiast
949 Views
5 Replies
Message 1 of 6

3D Adaptive Not Ignoring What It Should, I Think

redmond.limited
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

Hello,

 

I suspect that this is a very silly question with a very simple answer but I have tried lots of things and not been able to get 3D adaptive to do what I want it to do.

 

I am trying to set up the toolpaths for a turner's cube (just for the sake of a bit of practice) and, on my first op, the 3D adaptive I get the toolpath shown in the first picture below.  The bits outlined by red ellipses seem, to me, to be unnecessary: I feel that the tool should just, really spiral down into the stock and then follow a circular path.  I don't know why those extra outlined bits of the toolpath are there, other than, maybe, it is looking at the "holes" in the underlying geometry (see second picture below).

 

I've tried various things to sort this out (machining boundary with the tool inside, outside and on centre on the boundary and with various additional offsets; putting in patch surfaces to cover up the "holes" in the underlying geometry) but none of them seem to work.  The only thing that seems to work is taking the radial stock to leave up to 0.5mm.

 

Can anybody offer any help or advice, please, that would allow me to have the stock to leave at only 0.3mm or 0.2mm without having this issue?

 

As ever, any comments, at all, would be much appreciated.

 

Thanks,

 

Clem.

 

redmondlimited_0-1703804148002.pngredmondlimited_0-1703804148002.png

 

 

redmondlimited_1-1703804174147.pngredmondlimited_1-1703804174147.png

 

Accepted solutions (1)
950 Views
5 Replies
Replies (5)
Message 2 of 6

programming2C78B
Mentor
Mentor

Setting your Minimum Stepdown Value to that of the depth of that top counterbore will remove these. Do you have Flat Area Detection on as well? 

Please click "Accept Solution" if what I wrote solved your issue!
0 Likes
Message 3 of 6

redmond.limited
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

Thanks for that.  I have tried that and it is better but I still get the little squiggles at the bottom of the lower counterbore:

redmondlimited_0-1703934861290.pngredmondlimited_0-1703934861290.png

I feel like there is something very obvious that I'm not doing that I should be doing.

 

Thanks, again, for your advice.

Message 4 of 6

programming2C78B
Mentor
Mentor

to get rid of those, simply increase your Minimum cutting Radius until they go away, but remember in reality you're going to be saving like 3 seconds by removing them. In this case, using 2D pocket with the same stepover and feed will make for a "cleaner" roughing toolpath since everything is circular. 

Please click "Accept Solution" if what I wrote solved your issue!
0 Likes
Message 5 of 6

seth.madore
Community Manager
Community Manager
Accepted solution

It's just a matter of Tolerance, really. 

Reducing the Tolerance from .1mm to .05mm gives us this:

2024-01-02_08h31_28.png2024-01-02_08h31_28.png


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing


0 Likes
Message 6 of 6

redmond.limited
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

Thank you very much for all your replies.  They have all been very helpful and this is now sorted out.

0 Likes