wcs problem on 4 axis setup

wcs problem on 4 axis setup

prettygoodnotbad
Advocate Advocate
2,820 Views
12 Replies
Message 1 of 13

wcs problem on 4 axis setup

prettygoodnotbad
Advocate
Advocate

I'm finally getting around to testing the rotary axis on our new machine.

 

The machine is a legacy woodworking Maverick (https://lwmcnc.com/cnc-mills/maverick-4-x8/) and uses Mach3. I've been using the Mach3mill post processor for everything that is 3 axis without any problems.

 

So I'm now testing a part that uses the turning center of the machine, and it seems to work in that the A axis was turning with the spindle, except the spindle was working on the total opposite end of where the 0 offset of the turning center is actually located.

 

So I'm assuming it's a coordinate problem in my setup.

 

This is illustrates it:

Screen Shot 2020-03-19 at 4.56.11 PM.png

 

This is the wcs I set up, which is essentially the same as I would do for the 3 axis parts, except I'm taking the center point rather than the bottom left corner:

 

Screen Shot 2020-03-19 at 4.54.28 PM.png

 

It could be a matter of inverting those coordinates but I don't really want to try something without understanding the logic first.

 

 

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (1)
2,821 Views
12 Replies
Replies (12)
Message 2 of 13

daniel_lyall
Mentor
Mentor

ou will need to post the model that has this problem it could be anything, To attach a file Go to File -> Export and save as a .F3D Archive File and attach it to your next post, if you can not post the file you can PM it to me or say in your next post you can not post the file and one of the Guys that do NDA work will help.


Win10 pro | 16 GB ram | 4 GB graphics Quadro K2200 | Intel(R) 8Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz 3.50 GHz

Daniel Lyall
The Big Boss
Mach3 User
My Websight, Daniels Wheelchair Customisations.
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn

0 Likes
Message 3 of 13

prettygoodnotbad
Advocate
Advocate

yes here is just the simple test I was doing. Never mind the actual tool path choice I'm sure there are better ways to machine this.

0 Likes
Message 4 of 13

daniel_lyall
Mentor
Mentor

I can not find why it is starting at the other end.

 

I have done an example of another way to do it so you can do it in one toolpath.

 

watch these videos for how to do it https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrx-8M8nRa-rNlkwIowx6Kw

 

 


Win10 pro | 16 GB ram | 4 GB graphics Quadro K2200 | Intel(R) 8Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz 3.50 GHz

Daniel Lyall
The Big Boss
Mach3 User
My Websight, Daniels Wheelchair Customisations.
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn

0 Likes
Message 5 of 13

prettygoodnotbad
Advocate
Advocate

The mach3 version I'm using is something Legacy customizes to be specific to their machine, it has a "turning" button that you press before launching a code that is meant to use the 4th axis. The point is that it sets the offset to the proper position to machine a part along the 4th axis.

 

So what I've discovered:

 

First off, there is no specific problem with the turning offset, if I click "turning" and then send the machine to offset it goes where it should. The problem happens when I start cycle, the spindle goes to the wrong place.

 

However, if I don't activate the "turning" option and manually set my XYZ 0 coordinates to the center of the 4th axis and then send the code the spindle seems to be working in the right spot. 

 

So it leads me to believe that whatever Legacy has setup with "turning" must be more than just the offset, something else goes haywire with this turning thing. So I think I will contact Legacy, but this is somewhat unknown territory for me, does this sound like something that would have to be adjusted in the post processor or something that needs to be adjusted in Mach3 settings, or something else? 

0 Likes
Message 6 of 13

prettygoodnotbad
Advocate
Advocate
Accepted solution

ok so it looks like what I needed to do was manually input offset number 6 in the post processor tab in setup, this is the offset the machine uses for the turning center.

0 Likes
Message 7 of 13

daniel_lyall
Mentor
Mentor

That is good that you have it going now.😀


Win10 pro | 16 GB ram | 4 GB graphics Quadro K2200 | Intel(R) 8Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz 3.50 GHz

Daniel Lyall
The Big Boss
Mach3 User
My Websight, Daniels Wheelchair Customisations.
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn

0 Likes
Message 8 of 13

prettygoodnotbad
Advocate
Advocate

Well I was pretty happy about it but now as per my other post 

 

https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-360-manufacture/rotary-axis-moving-too-slow/m-p/9390317#M77825

 

my a axis is rotating too slow, i think it’s a post processor thing, not sure if it’s something I’ll be able to solve.

0 Likes
Message 9 of 13

daniel_lyall
Mentor
Mentor

In mach3 you have to have the A-axis feed set to at least half more than what the other axis are set to so if X is set to 1000 A should be 1500 - 2000, it is something to do with how the motion planner works since it is time of flight.

 

As an example, a Velox CNC machine I do the programming for sometimes X is set to, velocity 100 and acceleration 20

the A axis is 800/400 this works really well for this machine and in toolpath config, rotation is set to use radius for feed rate.


Win10 pro | 16 GB ram | 4 GB graphics Quadro K2200 | Intel(R) 8Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz 3.50 GHz

Daniel Lyall
The Big Boss
Mach3 User
My Websight, Daniels Wheelchair Customisations.
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn

0 Likes
Message 10 of 13

prettygoodnotbad
Advocate
Advocate

Hm not sure I know what you mean, do I set it in mach3 or fusion and are we talking ipm or degrees per minute, or are those just arbitrary numbers as an example? 

0 Likes
Message 11 of 13

daniel_lyall
Mentor
Mentor

Have a look at my edit to the post.


Win10 pro | 16 GB ram | 4 GB graphics Quadro K2200 | Intel(R) 8Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz 3.50 GHz

Daniel Lyall
The Big Boss
Mach3 User
My Websight, Daniels Wheelchair Customisations.
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn

0 Likes
Message 12 of 13

prettygoodnotbad
Advocate
Advocate

So I finally found the settings, it is in motor tuning correct? Currently X is set to 600/18 and A is set to 100020/2500 so definitely over half more. I'm assuming these are the settings configured by the company who builds this machine, which must work for them.

0 Likes
Message 13 of 13

daniel_lyall
Mentor
Mentor

Yes, correct with those setting it should be fine you will need to try with inverse time on and off in the post.


Win10 pro | 16 GB ram | 4 GB graphics Quadro K2200 | Intel(R) 8Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz 3.50 GHz

Daniel Lyall
The Big Boss
Mach3 User
My Websight, Daniels Wheelchair Customisations.
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn

0 Likes