@christopher.cooperVHK2N
Chris, with respect what I have is not a "workaround" but the correct way that tooling selection/ordering/renumbering should be done.
I come from using several other CadCAM softwares over a number of years, I have always created/used Tool Type Libraries, Fusion does already have this facility where when creating an Operation I need a Flat End Mill I go to the Flat End Mill Type Library (Some are Sub split Rough/Finish) and select a tool for the job, a couple of clicks is all that is needed, copying and pasting tools back and forth usually ends up with a number of tools in the Main Library with the same tool number which then have to be altered to suit the job because you don`t want two tools with the same number but different Type/Size and if one "slips through the cracks" then there is a potential for serious problems at the CNC Machine !!
FWIW May I suggest that instead of trying to change something that works quite well the offending "copy/paste" be removed altogether and the Tool Library will then work correctly as I believe that there is no logical/safe reason for having that facility in the first place ??
Surely it has to be much easier/simpler that when a tool is required to just click the relevant Tool Type Library/select tool for job and it is done, no extra tool renumbering, no select and click to copy then go to another Setup and click to paste, too much time wasted there for me, I cannot think of a situation where I would ever want/need to copy/paste, that`s just "unatural" and dangerous to me 🙂 🙂
If a user then has to renumber tools because his/her CNC control doesn`t do "Hot Swap" and/or doesn`t have a big enough Library available in the control to cover the numbers required (Yes, I have had a few of those) and requires the tooling to be numbered T1 through "whatever" to match the "pots" in the ATC then you do already have that covered quite well 🙂
So, once again with respect I would like to put forward as a suggestion that the copy/paste function be removed completely.
This IMHO will bring down the Developement Time on the New Tool Library dramatically, instead of chasing a system to get it to work just remove the problem, now, that is a "workaround" for sure 🙂 🙂 🙂
Regards
Rob