Problem with Mach3Mill Post for 4th Axis

Problem with Mach3Mill Post for 4th Axis

hhshermit
Contributor Contributor
713 Views
3 Replies
Message 1 of 4

Problem with Mach3Mill Post for 4th Axis

hhshermit
Contributor
Contributor

I'm trying to generate numbers around a handwheel dial. Got Fusion to do the design and it simulates fine and even tells me how long it will take to machine. But when I try to generate the G code, the standard Artsoft "Mach3Mill" post processor generates code with inverse time functions for A axis movement. My Gecko 320X driver does not accept this and faults out, even if I slow the speed to 25%.  Is there a different post processor that will use G93 instead of G94?

I saw where it was possible to edit the Post Processor to change "var useInverseTimeFeed = true" to "var useInverseTimeFeed = false" but this did not work for me. The next attempt to post failed with the odd message "This post configuration has not been customized for 5-axis simultaneous tool path". I see no reason why that change would introduce an extra axis.

Any help would be appreciated.

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (2)
714 Views
3 Replies
Replies (3)
Message 2 of 4

Arun.rs
Autodesk
Autodesk
Accepted solution

Hi @hhshermit 

 

You can use "var useInverseTimeFeed = false" to disable the inverse time feed rate output. The error is because of the post property ' Fourth axis mounted along ' which has to set as per the machine kinematic, either in X of Y.

 

4th Axis.png

 

Try at your end and let me know the feedback.

 

REgards

If my post answers your question, please click the 'Accept Solution' button. This helps everyone find answers more quickly!



Arun.RS
Senior Technology Consultant

0 Likes
Message 3 of 4

hhshermit
Contributor
Contributor
Accepted solution

Thanks for the help.  At least now the G Code generates without programming errors.  Now I have to find out if I have my A axis parameters properly set in the post processor to get the engraving I need.  If not, I may request a bit more help from you.

0 Likes
Message 4 of 4

hhshermit
Contributor
Contributor

Thanks for the help.  With those changes and upgrading to Mach4, the code now runs.