No idea how to modify a 4 cornered patch into a more segmented one

No idea how to modify a 4 cornered patch into a more segmented one

technikYB85C
Participant Participant
107 Views
8 Replies
Message 1 of 9

No idea how to modify a 4 cornered patch into a more segmented one

technikYB85C
Participant
Participant

Hi, I am messing with patching and modifications of patches. 

 


Keine Ahnung_2.jpg

 

 

Keine Ahnung.jpg

 

 

I want to cut this contour from the underlying existing patch but I do not succeed. Tried desparetely for 5 hours, no idea exactly what to do and how to find a workflow to get these 2 edges inserted to the existing patches.

 

The upper picture shows why i need these trims, the contour has to be set back for later modelling of clamps. 

 

Please help if you can! Thanks a lot!

Fritz

 

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (3)
108 Views
8 Replies
Replies (8)
Message 2 of 9

davebYYPCU
Consultant
Consultant
Accepted solution

Like this?

 

With Modify > Trim.

 

Message 3 of 9

technikYB85C
Participant
Participant
Accepted solution

Yeah, you did it. I will try to replay, had a first guess how you did that. I am new with surface design, started yesterday the whole day until 3 o'clock in the night. 😁. I am a self learning guy and i have learned catia, siemens nx and solidworks and now fusion. Almost I could find a way to fix my problems, but without help like yours it is a true nightmare. 

 

Thank you very much, i will try to replay!

 

Fritz

0 Likes
Message 4 of 9

davebYYPCU
Consultant
Consultant
Accepted solution

Modify > Stitch to join the 2 wall bodies together.

For Modify > Trim, Select the new wall body in Browser as cutter (turns bluish),

click on panel to remove (turns reddish), press OK.

 

Might help...

Message 5 of 9

technikYB85C
Participant
Participant

Umpff ... i wrote a special thanks, but is gone with the wind here ... After submission no entry. Oh yeah ... 😩

0 Likes
Message 6 of 9

technikYB85C
Participant
Participant

Well, I am not outsourcing my tasks, I don't hope you will feel this way to be my intention. It's only a lack of understandig, because the parametric workflow in fusion aggregates generating elements and this is new to me and causes some problems for my understand how to continue. 

 

Prepared surfaces bodies for a cutting solid .jpg

 

I fail to generate the top and bottom faces, because these are aggregated by Body36. The idea is to generate a cutting solid like in the left top corner. and remove this from Body36. 

Agregated by Body36.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

0 Likes
Message 7 of 9

technikYB85C
Participant
Participant

My problems of understanding are as described here: 

 

1) I do not exactly know the geoemetric prerequisties for Patches. I assume, they do not only have to be flat and to sit on a plane? They can also be on a ruled surface? They can sit on any ruled or parametric surface?

 

2) Aggegation sub elements is a kind of system behaviour to keep the history lean and not overwhelmed by elements. But my Body36 swallowed all surfaces and patches and if I want to get them out to make a copy I fail ... I have to do some systematic testings on this workflow. I forced this modelling because i wanted to have a result.

 

It's for scanning old automotive parts and doing a redesign or mechanical upgrade. I failed with scan data in SolidWorks, the system is very, very sleepy and has poor functions, When you want enhancements, you have to pay and this can be very expensive. 

 

Fusion is very capable in surfaces and manages very complex surface input. With Solidworks, you fail just when reading. 

0 Likes
Message 8 of 9

davebYYPCU
Consultant
Consultant

Without studying your intent, the file seemed unusual.  Will revisit later, but
Based on prior answer - I stitched 2 walls for one body to become the cutter.  Are you stitching (aggregating) too many, or too early?

 

Patch definition - not related to planes, they are successfully created with a chain of coincident articles.  
Perimeter of a void.  You can further add rails, but I don’t have that experience.

 

You seem struck on modelling this detail with surfaces, I prefer a hybrid method or simply best tool for the job.

You set the mesh model up on the Origin, and then ignored it, consider a workflow that works away from the Origin. 

Only you know where the true geometry goes and what in the scan is erroneous.

 

A technique I use is to consider the initial stages as a series of shapes without the fillets.  Fillet later.

 

Updated file with examples attached.


Might help….

 

0 Likes
Message 9 of 9

technikYB85C
Participant
Participant

Good morning dave, 

 

oh sorry, i was so much focussed on the cad problem and forgot documentation. This is the part. 
Clip B Säule Smart 451 links A45 63 00 136.jpg


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Next picture shows the part in position, but not already clamped in the B-Pillar cover because this is the trouble with this part. Once fixed, never can be unfixed without destroying. And Smart calls about 30 $ for this like breaker. 

 

Part in Position but unclamped.jpg

 

Verkleidung B Säule Smart 451 links A451 69 01 125.jpg

 

 

 

0 Likes