- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report
A little background first - I am not a trained engineer and everything I've learned about Fusion 360 has come from YouTube videos. I'm getting very comfortable with the software, but as I embark on larger projects, I want to make sure that I'm doing things the "right" way, hence the following question for you experts out there:
What is a good guiding principle for knowing when to create a sub-assembly in a file unique to the main assembly. And extending that, when should a "part" be stored uniquely in it's own file versus modeled in a sub- or main-assembly.
To try to make this question more concrete, attached is a model of the cockpit section of a large, ridable robot spider that I'm working on. It's not exceedingly complex, but when it's all said and done it'll probably have a few hundred parts (bearings, bushings, etc. included). I still have a long way to go, but before I go to far, I'm wondering what is the best file / directory structure for doing this?
Should I model the mid-section as I have with all it's many components modeled in the same file? Or should I create each part individually and import it into the sub-assembly? That latter option seems tricky because I imagine many of the parts would derive from projected geometry of adjacent parts - so if a given part is to be modeled in a separate file, how does one even get the projection? But on the other hand, modeling everything in one file as I've done in the attached leaves us with a pretty complicated timeline.
Perhaps I'm over thinking this. The reason I'm even considering this is because I saw the trouble Martin ran into with the Marble Machine X (see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ur0b6hh9joM), and he had to get very organized in terms of file structure just to continue using Fusion. I anticipate future projects getting more complex and would like to understand the best practice in these scenarios.
Solved! Go to Solution.