@mavigogun wrote:It sure seems Autodesk is intent on retaining GD as a service.
That's true. But for other parts of the application that are cloud based they do offer offline alternatives (rendering, parts of simulation)
@mavigogun wrote: I, too, wonder if that is viable, time wise- just how much processing power do the Amazon servers provide? Does 5 minutes on their server farm equate to hours or days on my machine?
Allowing students/hobbyists to pay for the service would be great- but I can understand retaining GD capacity as a subscription hook. Aside from "we're looking into it" or "we're working on it", I'd just like to know what Autodesk intends.
That's nothing you can tell by looking at a black box. Look at this 6 year old demonstration from googles servers. The video is just 4 minutes long, but you get a sense of what scalability means. And they can do more today.
I never worked with Amazon services, but unless they're competitors I guess they're comparable.
@mavigogun wrote:
Allowing students/hobbyists to pay for the service would be great- but I can understand retaining GD capacity as a subscription hook. Aside from "we're looking into it" or "we're working on it", I'd just like to know what Autodesk intends.
My understanding is, that they have a "max coin limit" and that's fine if they offer offline alternatives. So people can decide to spend money (and GD costs a lot) or to spend time. Even today's approach to limit the result (like resolution for renderings) is a totally valid for me.