Fillet operation starts when using pull?

Fillet operation starts when using pull?

TimelesslyTiredYouth
Collaborator Collaborator
398 Views
9 Replies
Message 1 of 10

Fillet operation starts when using pull?

TimelesslyTiredYouth
Collaborator
Collaborator

I don't know if this is just a glitch or a functionality I'm missing. I've noticed it for maybe 6-ish months, but it hasn't annoyed me enough for me to bring it up to the forum until today.

 

When you use the "Press pull" feature, selecting all the faces first, then selecting "Press pull" will work perfectly fine; however, when you open the feature "Press pull" and then select the faces, it goes from "Press pull" to "Fillet"

 

Is this just something I'm missing somehow, as in a feature for engineers that it's just meant to go to fillet as lines may be within the selection, or is this just a legitimate issue with Fusion? - I attached a video of me experiencing, the oddity? not really an issue, just an inconvenience.

 

Ricky

(view in My Videos)

 

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (1)
399 Views
9 Replies
Replies (9)
Message 2 of 10

SaeedHamza
Advisor
Advisor
Accepted solution

The issue you're facing is due to "Selection Priority" in the Select drop-down menu.
As you have the "Select Face Priority" active, when you select before activating the tool, the selection will choose faces over edges, but that whole concept changes if the tool is activated first, as each tool has different types of selections to it's dialog box, and from what your facing, I assume that the Press Pull tool has it's own priority to Edges first, therefore, the command becomes a Fillet.

Saeed Hamza
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

Message 3 of 10

TimelesslyTiredYouth
Collaborator
Collaborator

How do I deactivate "selection priority"? I've never seen or heard of it before – I just want whatever feature I select to stay as the feature I selected.

 

Ricky

0 Likes
Message 4 of 10

davebYYPCU
Consultant
Consultant

Select > Select Priority menu, allows you to edit the default.

 

Seeing that you managed to select all faces on that body, inside slots and external boundaries, what will be the intended result?

In other questions you were working for / toward parametric certainty,

Press Pull - is not timeline intuitive, the last thing needed for accuracy.

 

Might help...

Message 5 of 10

TimelesslyTiredYouth
Collaborator
Collaborator

Deselected outside faces and all curved surfaces to ensure only inside slots were selected; however, you are right; I changed one of the THICKNESS parameters from 10 mm to 5 mm, and all the inner slot faces were deselected. My current workaround is to create a sketch on the outer side of the "side panel", project everything and go through the painstakingly long process of offsetting all the inner slots by "-0.4", then select all these small -0.4 offsets to extrude and manually create the tolerances.

 

This creates a width of 10.8 mm, and when the THICKNESS parameter is changed to 5 mm, the slot width is now 5.8 mm. This proves that it is parametrically acceptable; however, I forgot that 0.4 + 0.4 is 0.8, so I just need to go back and change the offset value to 0.2 mm so that I get 10.4 and 5.4 mm widths. I don't think it's worth making a parameter for offset tolerance, as it's just always 0.2 mm, not something that needs to be changed.

 

Thanks for pointing out my error

Screenshot_8-4-2026_8553_fusion.online.autodesk.com.jpg

It did indeed help a lot...

Ricky

P.S

So glad parameters exist; it makes life so much easier than selecting each dimension on the sketch.

Screenshot_8-4-2026_81120_fusion.online.autodesk.com.jpeg

 

 

0 Likes
Message 6 of 10

davebYYPCU
Consultant
Consultant

Wow.  You certainly like doing things the hard way. 

Should be Parameter called Clearance value 0.2

 

How did you "cut" the slot into the end plate?  

Extrude > Cut a rectangle? 

Combine > Cut with a board that has the tab on it?

 

Might help...

0 Likes
Message 7 of 10

TimelesslyTiredYouth
Collaborator
Collaborator

What I did was use extrude to make the tabs on the middle panels, then I used the combine feature to cut away the tabs from the side panels. Then in the stage I'm in right now, I've just used offset and extrude to create the tolerances.

 

Looking back, I'm realising it could've been done so much more efficiently; it's one of those RTFM moments where I could've just, instead, just in the beginning, offset the original sketch tabs and extruded through both side panels rather than using the combine tool twice for each panel. Then make the actual tabs, which would reduce my timeline SIGNIFICANTLY. I'll make a Parameter for tolerance 0.15 now and fix my offset nightmare.

 

Ricky

0 Likes
Message 8 of 10

davebYYPCU
Consultant
Consultant

I draw the tab on the side panel, and Thin Extrude > Cut the Clearance

Pattern the other tabs and slots.

One dedicated sketch used a few times.

 

Might help....

 

 

0 Likes
Message 9 of 10

TimelesslyTiredYouth
Collaborator
Collaborator

I'm going to finish the current design with my debatable workflow, as all I have left is to work out the distance of the Vesa bracket panel, and then the main structure is done, all that's left is ease of use (access panels) and aesthetic changes like filleting which isn't major which I can ignore. So I'll most likely model it from the beggining using everything that you've mentioned in this thread and the past thread using this error filled file as a reference, is it fine if I come back with a "perfected" file to see if my workflow is all fine in a few days?

 

Ricky

0 Likes
Message 10 of 10

davebYYPCU
Consultant
Consultant

Sure.  I am about to be travelling nearly 2 weeks before I can view files, but can monitor the forum, no pressure.