DOES AUTODESK FUSION 360 SUPPORT LINUX OS

DOES AUTODESK FUSION 360 SUPPORT LINUX OS

Anonymous
Not applicable
116,637 Views
224 Replies
Message 1 of 225

DOES AUTODESK FUSION 360 SUPPORT LINUX OS

Anonymous
Not applicable

HELLO 

I WOULD LIKE TO DOES AUTODESK FUSION 360 SUPPORT LINUX OS

AND 

WHICH WOULD BE THE BEST PROCSSER FOR FUSION IF I AM HANDELING LARGE CAM AND COMPLEX 3D ASSEMLY

LET ME KNOW

Accepted solutions (2)
116,638 Views
224 Replies
Replies (224)
Message 21 of 225

cekuhnen
Mentor
Mentor

@Anonymous

 

I as a creative person that works with all 3 OS slightly have to disagree with you here.

 

Look for us much as Linux was hyped and such it never gained and never will gain

the acceptance and saturation Win and macOS have.

 

The reasons for that is the nature of Linux distribution itself and how diverse it is.

As trippy explained Linux has just too many versions and such to make that really a usable platform.

 

Linux is actually used in CG a lot because of the raw processing power it can have but this are specialized cases.

 

I agree that the power of Linux is good but the reason why macOS is so much better at design

and media handling is not be cause it has commercial support but because the human interface

and how apps and files are interlinked just is better than Windows or Linux.

 

Take a look at what Windows focuses on - it still has no PDF support build in.

 

 

I think Linux would have been better in case they would have focused development.

 

One success story here is Android.

 

 

Fusion is cloud connected so in case the browser based app can be close to some of the desktop modules like sketching and modeling (OnShape can do it)

then I think the web app will be good for the Linux users.

 

 

Claas Kuhnen

Faculty Industrial Design – Wayne State Universit

Chair Interior Design – Wayne State University

Owner studioKuhnen – product : interface : design

0 Likes
Message 22 of 225

Anonymous
Not applicable

So it's stil no fusion 360 version for Linux or Ubuntu ?

 

And the better solution is to not use fusion 360 when we are ubuntu user ?

Message 23 of 225

TrippyLighting
Consultant
Consultant

What other CAD system are you currently using on Linux and did you post your concerns on their forums ?and what were responses there.

 

You have a pretty clear choice at this moment: If you NEED a CAD system you either use Windows or macOS.

 

Just to be clear, I am not against an implementation of Fusion 360 on on a Linux platform. I just don't think that it is realistic to expect that in the next say 5 years. There are too many areas in Fusion 360 that need to be brought up to a level where it can compete with other solutions on the market and implementing this on a 3rd OS platform is a pretty large and complex task.

 

 


EESignature

0 Likes
Message 24 of 225

jeromenowe
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

If it's supported on Windows and Mac OS then it can be supported too on Linux. Excepting graphical library and compiler, what could differ fundamentally with a Linux version?

Moreover, I have never seen any Mac OS in machining environment. But I've already seen Linux with MCM machining tools. 

Message 25 of 225

etfrench
Mentor
Mentor

The fundamental difference is the number of potential paying customers.  Other than being open source and having hundreds of different versions, what is it about Linux that would make it worth using?

 

p.s. I have a Linux machine running LinuxCNC that I use most every day.  It suits the purpose well.

ETFrench

EESignature

0 Likes
Message 26 of 225

Anonymous
Not applicable

On linux i use On Shape 🙂

 

I make the change windows to linux one year ago (because windows doesn't work with out reason). And now i'm kind enchanted by the posibility in linux.

I doesn't want to come back to windows !

I had the habits to develop on Solidworks, Catia.

I try Autodesk Fusion 360 on a techshop computer and as i doesn't have the possibility to change i want try it on mine computer but i doesn't want to go back to windows.

When you had the habits of the freedom you don't want pack to the proprietary OS.

 

Message 27 of 225

daniel_lyall
Mentor
Mentor

Then you will have why is it not on my version of linux why should we only use one version of linux's it's a big circle. If someone stepped up for it to be done and supplied the staff  


Win10 pro | 16 GB ram | 4 GB graphics Quadro K2200 | Intel(R) 8Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz 3.50 GHz

Daniel Lyall
The Big Boss
Mach3 User
My Websight, Daniels Wheelchair Customisations.
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn

Message 28 of 225

7503777
Participant
Participant

I do not understand. If you compiled a program for OS X, why can not you do the same for Linux? There is no need to write a new source code For this. If you do not want to do this because linux is not so popular, but if the Fusion 360 is available for this system, you have great chance of changing the market for operating systems in the world) !

Message 29 of 225

TrippyLighting
Consultant
Consultant

@7503777 wrote:

I do not understand. If you compiled a program for OS X, why can not you do the same for Linux? There is no need to write a new source code For this. If you do not want to do this because linux is not so popular, but if the Fusion 360 is available for this system, you have great chance of changing the market for operating systems in the world) !


 

I transitioned to Linux from MS DOS before Windows 3.11 was on the market. I've used Linux for 15 years for computer graphics, programming etc.

If there was ever a chance for Linux to change the desktop operating system market, it is long gone!

 

Enterprise software is a bit more complex than just compiling it for a different OS. While macOS is a microkernel BSD UNIX variant that does not mean it can simply be compiled and then runs on Linux. That is just a ridiculously uninformed statement.

 

Before responding to my message please read the rest of the posts in this thread and the maybe go to the Idea station and read the responses in the Linux/Ubuntu idea.

 

Then maybe we have a common basis to further discuss this topic, or perhaps put it to rest.


EESignature

Message 30 of 225

Anonymous
Not applicable

I read some part of the thread you show up TrippyLigthing, really interesting and yes complex.

 

Some interesting discussions is for the developing of the OS agnostics browser based version of fusion 360 some engineering development in C++ can create great progressing in the subject. 

Yes the commercial and strategic of Autodesk is priority to Leopard, this one will create a team knowing the technical part of integrate fusion 360.

Stay the question did it leopard become the primary platform of Fusion 360?

Bring a Linux development in software, allow some more autonomous and code-friendly client.

Yes is not really a commercial based shift but it will create long-term self sustaining of the software.

 

 

Message 31 of 225

Anonymous
Not applicable
As Linux has the flatpack option now, Linux support would be better and cheaper now. Every dependancy in one package.
Message 32 of 225

daniel_lyall
Mentor
Mentor

It would still cost millions to do.


Win10 pro | 16 GB ram | 4 GB graphics Quadro K2200 | Intel(R) 8Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz 3.50 GHz

Daniel Lyall
The Big Boss
Mach3 User
My Websight, Daniels Wheelchair Customisations.
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn

Message 33 of 225

Anonymous
Not applicable

Also if Autodesk would choose Debian or Ubuntu as the only distribution to support?

Let the community figure out how to get it to work on other distributions.

Message 34 of 225

daniel_lyall
Mentor
Mentor

It wont happen to ADSK know they will not lose money doing it or will make it back within a set time, if you can get every linux user to give $10 each it would happen then Smiley Happy

 

To be clear I use to disagree with this idea.


Win10 pro | 16 GB ram | 4 GB graphics Quadro K2200 | Intel(R) 8Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 v3 @ 3.50GHz 3.50 GHz

Daniel Lyall
The Big Boss
Mach3 User
My Websight, Daniels Wheelchair Customisations.
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn

0 Likes
Message 35 of 225

Anonymous
Not applicable

I think it would be a good profitable option.

The same as WIndows and Mac the license would cost the same.

How many people want to switch to Linux because of security and privacy issues.

They can't at the moment because no sane 3D development platform is available.

 

Or make it BSD based. Mac is BSD based as well 🙂

Then ADSK can use proprietary libraries and files.

Message 36 of 225

Anonymous
Not applicable

This cost millions : https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/nasa_systems_engineering_handbook_0.pdf

 

A 3D integration i think is possible cheaper !

0 Likes
Message 37 of 225

brianrepp
Community Manager
Community Manager

Obviously the browser Fusion is not a current replacement for the desktop version, but if it were, and it supported more browser types, would you consider running this on your Linux machine(s)?

0 Likes
Message 38 of 225

I_Forge_KC
Advisor
Advisor

@brianrepp

 

FRAME

 

say it with me now....

 

FRAME!

 

That is all.

 

PS - I'd pay for it if it was available

 


K. Cornett
Generative Design Consultant / Trainer

Message 39 of 225

brianrepp
Community Manager
Community Manager

🙂  haha, yes, heard you loud and clear at the EE summit.  Cat Happy

Message 40 of 225

Anonymous
Not applicable

When we click on the link for the web version it says that only windows and mac are supported. Why would a web version limit the use to windows or mac? that is sort of ridiculous.

I can understand the logic for the native version but the web version.

 

Michel