@joao_mamede wrote:
This makes no sense, it takes less money to code in linux than windows, therefore the windows version should be more expensive if we go bean counting.
Can you provide some hard data?
Where does that "less expensive" come from?
Less cost in required hardware?
Less cost in required software?
Fewer hours in programing?
What is the cost of retraining an entire organization in the use of new development tools?
How long does it take to get into a routine so that work can continue productively?
I am looking for hard numbers here, not opinions gathered on Forums discussing these topics with other users who don't have data.
It's fun playing the devil's advocate. People are all too eager to assume you have something against... whatever.
Just so I can provide a bit of background on where this is coming from. I spent 20 of 30 years of my engineering career developing concepts, budgets, and proposals for large capital equipment projects. When working for companies acquiring equipment I had to provide the justification as well. It is very painful having to argue the merits of an investment with people who have no imagination!
Today I work for a company providing & building that equipment. I don't personally have to worry about the justification process anymore, but I do have to help our customers along that process.
It is not us you have to convince. I'd love to see a version for Linux.