@Anonymous wrote:
As the originator of this thread, I never could get Fusion to work correctly, and after a couple weeks of trying to figure out if I should create parts out of components, or components out of sketches, and building a series of joints starting from what I intended to be the stationary component, only to have the entire thing swivel around some later joint for no apparent reason after working ok for the first 3 or 4, I gave up.
The tool works in a way you don't understand- is the problem the tool, the designer... or the operator? Often- due to actual design failures or broken features, which can be hard to discern.
A spur in the middle of a handle is a design failure- Fusion has a few of those; occasionally you'll reach for a tool and need to stop the bleeding before continuing. Is that the problem here?
A broken tool is like the head flying off of a hammer- and, tragically, not entirely uncommon for Fusion. Broken tools become damning when, known, are left to persist- when workflows based on presumed function are necessarily abandoned, plotted around as a matter of course. Is that the problem here?
An ignorant tool operator may stumble their way to productivity, but not consistently. Would-be users of Fusion will need to educate themselves if they hope to achieve any satisfaction in an environment including design failures and broken features. Judging from my experience with joints, the problem voiced here is on the operator side of the screen. You can fix that, if you care to- though not well indexed, their are many, many video tutorials on implementing joints.
It should come as no surprise, but being an builder of tools does not translate into a capacity to teach. At some point, some decider with Autodesk determined Fusion would not be comprehensively documented -instead, a patchwork of thin summations and basic function videos was abandoned in favor of serial learning-through-task videos, tips, and user created instruction. While between those resources and this space most every concern may be addressed, the arrangement poses a hurtle some won't have sufficient momentum to surmount.
You can't cheat experience. Going form point A to point B might be an undaunting task if you're just walking across the room; if you want to fly a jet, you're gonna need a manual and some training. Well, Fusion has no manual. If you're suited to it, as some are, training may suffice. For that, you'll have to delay satisfaction while you seek out training exercises. For sure, Autodesk has decided to limit its market to those who can tolerate this circumstance.