Constraining to ellipses with tangent & coincident constraints (includes pic and demo .f3d file)

Constraining to ellipses with tangent & coincident constraints (includes pic and demo .f3d file)

autodesk2HB53E
Community Visitor Community Visitor
299 Views
8 Replies
Message 1 of 9

Constraining to ellipses with tangent & coincident constraints (includes pic and demo .f3d file)

autodesk2HB53E
Community Visitor
Community Visitor

Hi,

So, I've got three solid cylinders. Their axes point in arbitrary directions. Conveniently, one cylinder happens to point straight along Z. But the other two are slanted arbitrarily. They are all sliced through by a plane (which happens to be the World XY plane), and my goal is to draw a profile that you might think of as a rubber band around them all on this plane, and I want this all to be fully parametric. So, I select the slice plane as my Sketch Plane and then choose Intersect to isolate the simple 2D underlying geometry - one perfect circle, two ellipses. I draw three lines and begin to add coincident and tangent constraints, like this:


ellipse_tangent_problem.jpg

 

But whatever I try, I can't get the last line to constrain to the ellipse indicated by the black arrow. I need to add tangent and coincident constraints. But Fusion 360 refuses to solve. Agh!

Please help. I have attached the actual demo .f3d file from which the pic was generated to this message.

0 Likes
300 Views
8 Replies
Replies (8)
Message 2 of 9

TrippyLighting
Consultant
Consultant

Tangency to arbitrary points on a spline does not function in Fusion. If I remember correctly, the same applies to ellipses.


EESignature

0 Likes
Message 3 of 9

TheCADWhisperer
Consultant
Consultant

@autodesk2HB53E 

You will have to test whether this proposed solution is fully parametric.

I did not understand why you created multiple work planes.

I would need to observe logic.

(view in My Videos)

 

Message 4 of 9

kacper.suchomski
Mentor
Mentor

(view in My Videos)


Kacper Suchomski

EESignature


YouTube - Inventor tutorials | LinkedIn | Instagram

Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.


0 Likes
Message 5 of 9

TrippyLighting
Consultant
Consultant

@rohit.bapat, the behavior that the OP and the two posters show in their videos, which I find very easy to reproduce, is very buggy and is unlikely to create a reliable. PLease record this as yet another sketch bug.

@kacper.suchomski @TheCADWhisperer Posting workarounds is fine. Not reporting obvious bugs is negligent!


EESignature

Message 6 of 9

autodesk2HB53E
Community Visitor
Community Visitor

Sadly, neither of the proposed solutions result in reliable, properly parametric (updateable) models. Thank you both for trying. Autodesk, please take note of this bug.

0 Likes
Message 7 of 9

Closed-Loop-Bot
Autodesk
Autodesk
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. We're investigating the issue, and you can reference ticket FUS-256555 when communicating with Autodesk to find out more. Once the status of this will change, there will be a follow-up forum post made.
0 Likes
Message 8 of 9

rohit.bapat
Autodesk
Autodesk

Hello @TrippyLighting 

 

It's a bad bug indeed. I have created ticket FUS-256555 for the team to take a look at. I was able to reproduce the issue very easily with the dataset.

 

Thank you





Rohit Bapat
Sr. Product Owner
Message 9 of 9

Closed-Loop-Bot
Autodesk
Autodesk
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. We're investigating the issue, and you can reference ticket FUS-261476 when communicating with Autodesk to find out more. Once the status of this will change, there will be a follow-up forum post made.
0 Likes