Complex Angle Faces: How to dimension in drawing?

Complex Angle Faces: How to dimension in drawing?

tonySWCR2
Advocate Advocate
2,498 Views
11 Replies
Message 1 of 12

Complex Angle Faces: How to dimension in drawing?

tonySWCR2
Advocate
Advocate

Hello All, 

 

Attached is a simple sheet metal part that has non-perpendicular bends. This causes the face to be angled in all three main planes. In the example there are 2 holes on this face. How do I dimension them in a F360 drawing? I know how I would do it in other packages but Im lacking tools in F360. Can it be done?

 

Lets ignore that its sheet metal and you could flat pattern it, imagine its a solid part so making a flat component view isn't an option. 

 

Cheers, 

Tony

 

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (2)
2,499 Views
11 Replies
Replies (11)
Message 2 of 12

jhackney1972
Consultant
Consultant
Accepted solution

It starts with a Named View in the model and then you create a modified Section View in the drawing.  I created a blog article and video on this process which you can view here.  I am sharing the drawing as a public link.  I have never done this before so I do not know how it will work.  You may have to use direct dimensioning instead of the dynamic dimensions for example I used the Diameter dimension command on the hole diameter instead of the dynamic dimension tool.  You will not get automated centerlines to work either, you could sketch they yourself.

 

Edit:   Look down further is forum question for a point that @laughingcreek made about how I went a little too far with my methods.  I got so involved thinking this was a great opportunity to show my method of Auxiliary Views I lost sight of the simple method of doing this.  Sorry, I hope you will take a look at my Blog article anyway.

 

Fusion 360 View Drawing.jpg

 

 

John Hackney, Retired
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

Message 3 of 12

laughingcreek
Mentor
Mentor
Accepted solution

@jhackney1972 -why the section view?  if you "look at" that face and name a view in the model, using that in the drawing produces a view that you can use center marks on, and avoids having to create a section view.

0 Likes
Message 4 of 12

jhackney1972
Consultant
Consultant

Good Point!  I got so wrapped up in the fact that this was an example of the method I used in my blog article on Auxiliary Views I guess I missed the obvious.  I can't see the forest for the trees!  I will edit my post, thanks.

John Hackney, Retired
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

0 Likes
Message 5 of 12

tonySWCR2
Advocate
Advocate

~deleted~

0 Likes
Message 6 of 12

tonySWCR2
Advocate
Advocate

I had kind of half muddled my way to the point of using section views as aux views but its so hard to get them to line up. Found a video you made on youtube which helped, using the green boxes and dragging across the dotted line to keep the view parallel. Where I was going wrong (by which I mean, where fusion fails me) was trying to use the smart dim tool, I just tried with the linear dimension tool and it works! Unfortunately, still no centre marks. 

 

Cheers for you help.

0 Likes
Message 7 of 12

jhackney1972
Consultant
Consultant

As @laughingcreek pointed out, using a Named View takes care of everything, including the Center Marks.

John Hackney, Retired
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.

EESignature

0 Likes
Message 8 of 12

chrisplyler
Mentor
Mentor

 

Unless there is some reason that this isn't acceptable...I would just dimension them on the Flat Pattern view.

 

 

0 Likes
Message 9 of 12

tonySWCR2
Advocate
Advocate

So it does. 

 

My real life problem has the face obscured by another feature in the component so I had to use your method, therefor loosing the CM's. 

0 Likes
Message 10 of 12

tonySWCR2
Advocate
Advocate

@chrisplyler there is always one

 

"Lets ignore that its sheet metal and you could flat pattern it, imagine its a solid part so making a flat component view isn't an option. "

0 Likes
Message 11 of 12

laughingcreek
Mentor
Mentor

@tonySWCR2 wrote:

...My real life problem has the face obscured by another feature in the component so I had to use your method, therefor loosing the CM's. 


if you start looking straight on b/c you used a named view, the cross-section is much easier to draw.  you can have your obscured view and also have your center marks-

laughingcreek_0-1599167104622.png

 

0 Likes
Message 12 of 12

chrisplyler
Mentor
Mentor

@tonySWCR2 wrote:

@chrisplyler there is always one


 

Sometimes I am the one. It happens.