4-1 Merge Collector Not Coming Out Properly

4-1 Merge Collector Not Coming Out Properly

mmicciolo
Contributor Contributor
7,665 Views
22 Replies
Message 1 of 23

4-1 Merge Collector Not Coming Out Properly

mmicciolo
Contributor
Contributor

Hello All,

 

I am trying to create a 4-1 merge collector. I can create the individual pieces. I am using 6" long pipe, 2" diameter, 11 degree intersection angle and cutting 270 degrees off of each pipe so that 4 x 90 = 360.

 

The pieces come out fine, but for some reason when trying to join them together into the collector, the last one never fits correctly.

 

Measuring each individual piece i get 90 degrees, but when two are aligned it reads 148 instead of 180.

 

Im not sure what I am doing wrong? Is it just an alignment issue?

 

Attached is a screencast as well as an attachment of the project.

 

 

 

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (1)
7,666 Views
22 Replies
Replies (22)
Message 2 of 23

davebYYPCU
Consultant
Consultant

They fit, but no idea if the angles are the required angles.

 

Mirror, twice.

 

2mrrrs.PNG

2mrrrs1.PNGmeasured angle is 149.8, but certainly misalignment for the cutting plane.  

Might help....

0 Likes
Message 3 of 23

mmicciolo
Contributor
Contributor

Thanks for the help!

 

So you're saying that my cutting plane (one created from the hypotenuse of the triangle in the drawing) is misaligned and causing the cuts to be incorrect and thus causing it not to fit together correctly?

0 Likes
Message 4 of 23

davebYYPCU
Consultant
Consultant
Accepted solution

Yes, it is in the setting out, and or the way you are misusing the end face of the tube to measure.

 

This file has the mirrors working correctly, Origin planes used for the splitting.  Neat and tidy, edit the angle in Sketch one to the angle you need, and all will update.

Currently it's set at 160, it looks a bit narrow.  Play the timeline....

 

2mrrrs2.PNG

 

File attached, 

Message 5 of 23

chrisplyler
Mentor
Mentor

 

I humbly submit that geometrically, the 90-deg angle you measure here...

 

mismeasure.JPG

 

...is not desired. I made a collector that fits correctly, and I did not get 90-deg at the same place.

 

mismeasure2.JPG

 

You want the 90-deg between the CUT FACES, which angle measurement is on a different plane than the one you made at the end of the tube.

 

mismeasure3.JPG

 

I'm attaching my file. Follow the time line.

 

 

 

Message 6 of 23

mmicciolo
Contributor
Contributor

Thank you everyone for the help!

 

My end goal was to make a 5 cyl collector, but I wanted to learn a 4 cyl first and now after seeing how a 4 cyl is done I was able to make a perfect 5 cyl one!

 

Thanks!

0 Likes
Message 7 of 23

davebYYPCU
Consultant
Consultant

Sweet, we like success stories.

0 Likes
Message 8 of 23

tomas.fober
Explorer
Explorer

Hello, found this topic. I want to made something similar as mmicciolo, . Could someone please just write what is the correct procedure how to design it? 

Thanks in advance

0 Likes
Message 9 of 23

davebYYPCU
Consultant
Consultant

Download my previous file, follow the steps I took, while you substitute your own dimensions.

 

If that doesn’t work, you need to stop when stuck, and explain why you are stuck.

 

Might help....

0 Likes
Message 10 of 23

tomas.fober
Explorer
Explorer

I have it, but why is there an 160 angle and 45 degree angle, whilst 4 cylinder has 90 degree between each cut on the band saw. On 5 cylinder it should be around 72+-. Or you mean it as 45degree + 45 degree = 90 ?

I already change diameter on pipe to 38mm and 3mm thick and change lenght of the tube to 100mm. But i cant add another 5 tube...

0 Likes
Message 11 of 23

TheCADWhisperer
Consultant
Consultant

@tomas.fober 

Can you File>Export your *.f3d file to your local drive and then Attach it here to a Reply?

 

BTW - when a thread has already been marked as Solved - it is probably best to start a new thread discussion with a link back to the Solved discussion as reference.  And always, always , always Attach *.f3d files, image files, and Screencast Recordings to illustrate your issue.  We are probably more geometry driven than mere word driven around here.

0 Likes
Message 12 of 23

tomas.fober
Explorer
Explorer

I use both files. One from davebYYPCU and second from chrisplyler. The second one is now actually 5 cylinder but inside merge it looks kinda wierd 😄 

0 Likes
Message 13 of 23

davebYYPCU
Consultant
Consultant

Yes kinda weird, cutting a 5 way pipe with 4 way cutter.

 

This sketch is 72 degrees, on origin plane.  

Cut Component 2 with this sketch (Split Body) remove inside piece, then pattern.

 

(Picture is timed out - not uploading)

 

Might help.....

Message 14 of 23

kostas_kritikos
Participant
Participant

Hello, I am working on a 4-1 merge collector design, with the intention of CNC producing 2-3 of them.

This is part of my Fusion 360 self learning. As you can see in my attached files, my draft is far away from final.

My biggest issues are:

 

  • The 4 pipes that merge together have their top sides all flat on the same plane.
  • Unrealistic to cut in a CNC machine for obvious reasons

I know how to do the threads in the holes, I know how to do a pipe at an angle. But I am not sure how to get 4 planes at the top 4 corners of an imaginary rectangular, in a way that would be like the finished product I am attaching as an example. Also the design has to be what realistically can be cut from a piece of steel, so any suggestions on how to achieve something like that one in the photo?

 

Thanks in advance

0 Likes
Message 15 of 23

davebYYPCU
Consultant
Consultant

The example photo, the top faces are square to the straight pipe centre line.

draw the centre line at the angle the pipe has to be, and Pipe Tool will do the example.

 

Your attempt looks like a Lofted pipe, bent or swollen, not sure.  If you have a centre line, use Plane on that path, to split body the top section.  Doesn’t like good for a thread on your attempt, should be round.

 

Attach the file for more accurate instructions.

 

Might help.....

 

 

0 Likes
Message 16 of 23

kostas_kritikos
Participant
Participant

I have made some progress. Thanks for the advice.

I am using "loft" as the opening in the flange is oval.

When I tried the "pipe" function it would leave some gaps between the pipe and the oval opening.

Not sure if there is another way to do it.

 

Now ideally I should fill in the deep point between the 4 pipes merging, for easier CNC machining.

Question is how?

kostas_kritikos_1-1654643482932.png

 

0 Likes
Message 17 of 23

davebYYPCU
Consultant
Consultant

Did you really want to shell the inside of the plate?

 

durwts.PNG

 

Not sure how you would fill the the centre intersection, depends on the fluid flow intentions.

 

Might help...

0 Likes
Message 18 of 23

kostas_kritikos
Participant
Participant

Not sure how I managed to do this. I noticed it earlier myself.

I will try correct it tonight.

Any ideas on how to fill the area between the 4 pipes on the top?

 

Also with this design, is it possible to change easily the angle of the merge pipes, without having to edit the sketch of the top plane in order to change the size of the "imaginary" square that defines the centers of the merge pipes?

0 Likes
Message 19 of 23

davebYYPCU
Consultant
Consultant

Edit the pipes as you need it, and make one of the pipes first, as new body then

I would use 2 mirrors on the first loft. (Join)

Make the plate as New Body,

and Combine cut the pipes out of the plate. 

Then shell top and bottom faces of the pipes,

combine Join the plate to the pipes.

 

Fill the top with a Boundary Fill, for a plane on top face, but not sure it is what you mean. 

Fillet as you wish.

 

Might help....

 

0 Likes
Message 20 of 23

kostas_kritikos
Participant
Participant

Hello, I am back to working on this turbo exhaust manifold.

I am using standard dimension pipe parts (90 degree elbow long & short radius, 45 degree elbow), which I modelled myself from available drawings.

Is there a way to automatically adjust the angles of the joints on the header so that these 2 pipe surfaces become parallel?

I tried to manually adjust both sides, but it could take forever! Too many combinations of relative angles between each pair of jointed pipes.

 

If this is not possible, then I will have to design the merge collector against the 4 pipes coming down.

Just wanted to know before I go down this path.

 

Turbo manifold final pipe merge.png

0 Likes