Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Show only
|
Search instead for
Did you mean:
This page has been translated for your convenience with an automatic translation service. This is not an official translation and may contain errors and inaccurate translations. Autodesk does not warrant, either expressly or implied, the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information translated by the machine translation service and will not be liable for damages or losses caused by the trust placed in the translation service.Translate
we have to simplify the modelling of any other items into it for this i prefer the properties of items like if i want to simulate an dumper so i want it properties so it directly work like dumper .
I am a little unsure of exactly what you are saying, but the lack of every type of machine or processor is intentional. If we included 3D objects that looked like every machine in manufacturing, our library would be excessively large and unwieldy. All you need to think about is what happens while your flow items are in the dumper. Are they separated, combined, or just in there for a certain amount of time? If they are just processed for a certain amount of time, then a processor is the object you should use. If you really need your 3D objects to look like your real life machines, you can make a model of them and change the appearance of the Processor. You can also make custom animations if visuals are important.
The purpose of simulation is to put in numbers and get our useful statistics and values that could help you improve your process. Since making a visual of every machine would not improve how well FlexSim could provide useful informauton, it is not a priority for us.
