Pull flow simulation

Pull flow simulation

s_jaubertREVKG
Participant Participant
646 Views
4 Replies
Message 1 of 5

Pull flow simulation

s_jaubertREVKG
Participant
Participant

[ FlexSim 24.2.2 ]

Here is a pull flow model.

The processor consumes items that are in bins that are initially in the processor's work in progress inventory.

When a bin is empty, an operator goes to get it and must place it in the empty bin rack. Then the operator goes to get a full bin in the inventory. Until the bins are exhausted.


What I can't understand is why the operator sometimes moves with an empty bin when he goes to get a full bin.


In the settings, if I increase the number of operators, this does not happen. Could this be due to a priority or synchronization problem??


Thanks in advance



0 Likes
Accepted solutions (1)
647 Views
4 Replies
Replies (4)
Message 2 of 5

s_jaubertREVKG
Participant
Participant
0 Likes
Message 3 of 5

allister_wilson
Not applicable
Accepted solution

In the second half of your process, when transporting the full bin to the processor, you currently have this setup:

current.png

The item label is set to an array containing all the items inside the bin.
The operator then unloads these items into the queue, not the bin itself.

I expect what you wanted was for the operator to unload the full bin to the queue instead, which would look like this in your model :

fixed.png

The reason it can still sometimes work is because when the queue is empty, the operator will "Load" the bin they are already carrying again, without said bin ever actually entering the queue.

0 Likes
Message 4 of 5

logan_gold
Community Manager
Community Manager

Hi @Stéphane Jaubert, was Allister Wilson's answer helpful? If so, please click the "Accept" button at the bottom of their answer. Or if you still have questions, add a comment and we'll continue the conversation.

If we haven't heard back from you within 3 business days we'll auto-accept an answer, but you can always comment back to reopen your question.

0 Likes
Message 5 of 5

s_jaubertREVKG
Participant
Participant

Thank you, I understand better

0 Likes