Community
EAGLE Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s EAGLE Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular EAGLE topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Polygon Cutout doesn't work in footprint editor

8 REPLIES 8
SOLVED
Reply
Message 1 of 9
trey
2234 Views, 8 Replies

Polygon Cutout doesn't work in footprint editor

trey
Advocate
Advocate

I'm trying to create a copper polygon in the footprint editor and then use the polygon cutout tool to remove an inner portion of it.  I have no problems making the outer copper polygon, but the cutout tool appears to have no effect.

 

Seems like this is a bug or a feature that still needs to be implemented.  For now I'll work around it in the normal board editor.

 

(EAGLE 9.1.0 on OSX)

If you found this post helpful, please click the "Accept Solution" button.


Trey German
Founder and Chief Engineer
Polymorphic Labs

Twitter | LinkedIn

0 Likes

Polygon Cutout doesn't work in footprint editor

I'm trying to create a copper polygon in the footprint editor and then use the polygon cutout tool to remove an inner portion of it.  I have no problems making the outer copper polygon, but the cutout tool appears to have no effect.

 

Seems like this is a bug or a feature that still needs to be implemented.  For now I'll work around it in the normal board editor.

 

(EAGLE 9.1.0 on OSX)

If you found this post helpful, please click the "Accept Solution" button.


Trey German
Founder and Chief Engineer
Polymorphic Labs

Twitter | LinkedIn

8 REPLIES 8
Message 2 of 9
jorge_garcia
in reply to: trey

jorge_garcia
Autodesk
Autodesk
Accepted solution
Hello @Anonymous,

It's nice to hear from you again. This one is a feature that still needs to be implemented.

I've created and enhancement report.

Let me know if there's anything else I can do for you.

Best Regards,


Jorge Garcia
​Product Support Specialist for Fusion 360 and EAGLE

Kudos are much appreciated if the information I have shared is helpful to you and/or others.

Did this resolve your issue? Please accept it "As a Solution" so others may benefit from it.

Hello @Anonymous,

It's nice to hear from you again. This one is a feature that still needs to be implemented.

I've created and enhancement report.

Let me know if there's anything else I can do for you.

Best Regards,


Jorge Garcia
​Product Support Specialist for Fusion 360 and EAGLE

Kudos are much appreciated if the information I have shared is helpful to you and/or others.

Did this resolve your issue? Please accept it "As a Solution" so others may benefit from it.
Message 3 of 9
trey
in reply to: jorge_garcia

trey
Advocate
Advocate

Jorge,

Could you also file an enhancement report to allow concentric copper polygons?

 

Currently, if you cut out a copper polygon, no copper polygons of a different net can be placed inside the cutout.  It would be nice if we could associate a cutout polygon with a specific solid polygon such that it only acted on a single solid instead of non-discriminately cutting.

 

Thanks!

Trey

If you found this post helpful, please click the "Accept Solution" button.


Trey German
Founder and Chief Engineer
Polymorphic Labs

Twitter | LinkedIn

0 Likes

Jorge,

Could you also file an enhancement report to allow concentric copper polygons?

 

Currently, if you cut out a copper polygon, no copper polygons of a different net can be placed inside the cutout.  It would be nice if we could associate a cutout polygon with a specific solid polygon such that it only acted on a single solid instead of non-discriminately cutting.

 

Thanks!

Trey

If you found this post helpful, please click the "Accept Solution" button.


Trey German
Founder and Chief Engineer
Polymorphic Labs

Twitter | LinkedIn

Message 4 of 9
jorge_garcia
in reply to: trey

jorge_garcia
Autodesk
Autodesk
Accepted solution
Hi @Anonymous,

We definitely want to make the polygon tools more flexible. However for the scenario you are mentioning (probably a capsense pad or something like that) you are better off using wires to create the concentric rings. EAGLE ring would consists of two arcs (circles don't work with the arbitrary pad shape feature) and you would place the pad or smd at a point where the two arcs meet. EAGLE would see the arcs as extensions of the pad(smd).

Let me know if there's anything else I can do for you.

Best Regards,


Jorge Garcia
​Product Support Specialist for Fusion 360 and EAGLE

Kudos are much appreciated if the information I have shared is helpful to you and/or others.

Did this resolve your issue? Please accept it "As a Solution" so others may benefit from it.
0 Likes

Hi @Anonymous,

We definitely want to make the polygon tools more flexible. However for the scenario you are mentioning (probably a capsense pad or something like that) you are better off using wires to create the concentric rings. EAGLE ring would consists of two arcs (circles don't work with the arbitrary pad shape feature) and you would place the pad or smd at a point where the two arcs meet. EAGLE would see the arcs as extensions of the pad(smd).

Let me know if there's anything else I can do for you.

Best Regards,


Jorge Garcia
​Product Support Specialist for Fusion 360 and EAGLE

Kudos are much appreciated if the information I have shared is helpful to you and/or others.

Did this resolve your issue? Please accept it "As a Solution" so others may benefit from it.
Message 5 of 9
trey
in reply to: jorge_garcia

trey
Advocate
Advocate

In the concentric case, I'm actually talking about the board editor.  I've got an antenna surrounded by a guard polygon, which is then surrounded by a ground polygon.  Its no big deal to work around it using multiple polygons, but in my mind it makes sense for cutouts to be associated with a particular solid polygon.  I've attached an image of the case I'm working around.

Secret circuit board ;)Secret circuit board 😉

If you found this post helpful, please click the "Accept Solution" button.


Trey German
Founder and Chief Engineer
Polymorphic Labs

Twitter | LinkedIn

0 Likes

In the concentric case, I'm actually talking about the board editor.  I've got an antenna surrounded by a guard polygon, which is then surrounded by a ground polygon.  Its no big deal to work around it using multiple polygons, but in my mind it makes sense for cutouts to be associated with a particular solid polygon.  I've attached an image of the case I'm working around.

Secret circuit board ;)Secret circuit board 😉

If you found this post helpful, please click the "Accept Solution" button.


Trey German
Founder and Chief Engineer
Polymorphic Labs

Twitter | LinkedIn

Message 6 of 9
Kristey
in reply to: trey

Kristey
Advocate
Advocate

Hi
I have a similar problem. I want make a Cap Pad and I need apply a polygon cutout on a inter layer, and this tool didnt work.

Kristey_0-1609262245269.png

 

How I can make it?

0 Likes

Hi
I have a similar problem. I want make a Cap Pad and I need apply a polygon cutout on a inter layer, and this tool didnt work.

Kristey_0-1609262245269.png

 

How I can make it?

Message 7 of 9
carlJTW5Q
in reply to: Kristey

carlJTW5Q
Participant
Participant

Hi @jorge_garcia, did that enhancement request go anywhere? I'm trying to define a footprint for a standoff which wants to have an NPTH through hole in the middle of the pad. The copper must be pulled back from the hole to avoid creating a burr; if there's a burr there the standoff won't sit level and the assembly wont work.

 

I have defined the copper land as a polygon and set an SMD pad in the middle like I would for an irregularly shaped pad. I put a hole in the middle of that polygon. I defined another polygon on the top layer as a cutout and made it into a cutout, with a gap between the edge of the drill and the cutout polygon.

 

The polygon cutout doesn't show up in the footprint editor, and when I pull the footprint into a PCB it still shows solid copper under the hole and raises a dimension error in DRC. It seems like it's still ignoring cutouts defined in the footprint. I have also tried defining a polygon on the tRestrict layer, and that doesn't seem to render correctly either.

 

If this hasn't been implemented yet, what is the recommended workaround to create a non plated through hole solder pad?

 

Thanks,

Carl

0 Likes

Hi @jorge_garcia, did that enhancement request go anywhere? I'm trying to define a footprint for a standoff which wants to have an NPTH through hole in the middle of the pad. The copper must be pulled back from the hole to avoid creating a burr; if there's a burr there the standoff won't sit level and the assembly wont work.

 

I have defined the copper land as a polygon and set an SMD pad in the middle like I would for an irregularly shaped pad. I put a hole in the middle of that polygon. I defined another polygon on the top layer as a cutout and made it into a cutout, with a gap between the edge of the drill and the cutout polygon.

 

The polygon cutout doesn't show up in the footprint editor, and when I pull the footprint into a PCB it still shows solid copper under the hole and raises a dimension error in DRC. It seems like it's still ignoring cutouts defined in the footprint. I have also tried defining a polygon on the tRestrict layer, and that doesn't seem to render correctly either.

 

If this hasn't been implemented yet, what is the recommended workaround to create a non plated through hole solder pad?

 

Thanks,

Carl

Message 8 of 9
jorge_garcia
in reply to: trey

jorge_garcia
Autodesk
Autodesk

Hi @carlJTW5Q,

 

I couldn't find the enhancement request and I've gone ahead and created it again. I've added this thread to it for evidence of this need.

 

The workaround for now is basically to make a strip of polygon that folds back on itself to make the donut polygon shape. See the attached images for more clarification.

 

Let me know if there's anything else I can do for you.

 

Best Regards,



Jorge Garcia
​Product Support Specialist for Fusion 360 and EAGLE

Kudos are much appreciated if the information I have shared is helpful to you and/or others.

Did this resolve your issue? Please accept it "As a Solution" so others may benefit from it.
0 Likes

Hi @carlJTW5Q,

 

I couldn't find the enhancement request and I've gone ahead and created it again. I've added this thread to it for evidence of this need.

 

The workaround for now is basically to make a strip of polygon that folds back on itself to make the donut polygon shape. See the attached images for more clarification.

 

Let me know if there's anything else I can do for you.

 

Best Regards,



Jorge Garcia
​Product Support Specialist for Fusion 360 and EAGLE

Kudos are much appreciated if the information I have shared is helpful to you and/or others.

Did this resolve your issue? Please accept it "As a Solution" so others may benefit from it.
Message 9 of 9
carlJTW5Q
in reply to: jorge_garcia

carlJTW5Q
Participant
Participant
Thanks Jorge. It's deeply depressing that that Autodesk can,
straight-faced, ship a product with such basic features broken for 5 years,
but that's obviously not your fault. As always, your forum posts are a tiny
lighthouse in the ocean of shame and despair that Eagle exudes.

Thanks Jorge. It's deeply depressing that that Autodesk can,
straight-faced, ship a product with such basic features broken for 5 years,
but that's obviously not your fault. As always, your forum posts are a tiny
lighthouse in the ocean of shame and despair that Eagle exudes.

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report